» Articles » PMID: 9358935

The Dynamics of Change: Cancer Patients' Preferences for Information, Involvement and Support

Overview
Journal Ann Oncol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Oncology
Date 1997 Nov 14
PMID 9358935
Citations 140
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: While the importance of providing individualised communication to cancer patients is now well recognised, little is known about the stability and validity of patients' expressed preferences for information and involvement in decision-making. This study explored the stability and possible predictors of such preferences over time.

Patients And Methods: Cancer patients seeing two Medical Oncologists in an out-patient clinic at an Australian teaching hospital completed a questionnaire battery before and directly after one consultation, and before their next consultation. Eighty consecutive patients with heterogeneous cancers participated in the study. Preferences for general and specific information, involvement and support were elicited at each assessment. Locus of control and patient familiarity with the clinic were measured before the first consultation. Patient satisfaction with the consultation was assessed directly after the consultation. Demographic and disease data were recorded for each patient.

Results: General preferences for information and involvement were relatively stable, at least in the short term; however there was considerable variability in preferences for specific topics of information. Patients whose condition had recently worsened were more likely to want progressively less involvement in decision-making. Gender, the doctor seen and religion were also predictive of patient preferences.

Conclusions: Situational factors, such as change in disease status, may alter a patient's preferences for information and involvement. If we wish to match the provision of information and support to the expressed needs of patients, we must ask patients at each consultation what those needs are.

Citing Articles

Analysis of preferences and responses to recall in adolescent and young adult head and neck cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy.

Chau A, Howard A, Goddard K, Hamilton S Support Care Cancer. 2025; 33(4):281.

PMID: 40085261 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-025-09340-w.


Validation of the EORTC information (QLQ-INFO25) and satisfaction with care (IN-PATSAT32) modules in the Polish cancer patient population.

Rudzinska A, Kukla P, Zygulska A, Grela-Wojewoda A, Pacholczak-Madej R, Gawel M BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):241.

PMID: 39939847 PMC: 11823141. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12382-9.


Patients' perceived involvement in clinical decision-making and associated factors among adult patients admitted at Jimma Medical Center, Oromia, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.

Dibera K, Debancho W, Bedada G, Dugasa Y BMJ Open. 2025; 14(12):e085984.

PMID: 39806677 PMC: 11664387. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085984.


Prospectively investigating the impact of AI onshared decision-making in post kidney transplant care (PRIMA-AI): protocol for a longitudinal qualitative study among patients, their support persons and treating physicians at a tertiary care centre.

Sassi Z, Eickmann S, Roller R, Osmanodja B, Burchardt A, Samhammer D BMJ Open. 2024; 14(10):e081318.

PMID: 39353696 PMC: 11448240. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081318.


Knowledge and attitude toward proton radiotherapy among oncology patients: a multi-center, cross-sectional study.

Xie W, Wang H, Sun Q, Wang Y, Wang Y, Chen H Future Oncol. 2024; 20(30):2271-2277.

PMID: 39129677 PMC: 11508946. DOI: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2383169.