» Articles » PMID: 25689448

Efficacy and Safety of Conversion to Monotherapy with Eslicarbazepine Acetate in Adults with Uncontrolled Partial-onset Seizures: a Randomized Historical-control Phase III Study Based in North America

Overview
Journal Epilepsia
Specialty Neurology
Date 2015 Feb 18
PMID 25689448
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as monotherapy in North American patients with partial-onset seizures (POS).

Methods: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind "withdrawal to monotherapy" study used historical control data as the comparator. Adults with POS medically uncontrolled by one to two antiepileptic drugs gradually converted to ESL monotherapy. Following an 8-week baseline period, patients were randomized 2:1 to receive ESL 1,600 mg (n = 128) or 1,200 mg QD (n = 65) for 18 weeks. The primary end point was the proportion of patients meeting predefined exit criteria (signifying worsening seizure control). Treatment was considered effective if the 95% upper confidence limit (UCL) for the Kaplan-Meier estimated exit rate was lower than the exit rate threshold calculated from the historical control (65.3%).

Results: Kaplan-Meier estimated exit rates were: ESL 1,600 mg, 28.7% (95% CI 21.2-38.1%) and 1,200 mg, 44.4% (32.5-58.3%). The difference between doses was not significant (p = 0.07). For both doses, the 95% UCLs for the exit rate were ˂ 65.3%; ESL monotherapy was considered superior to the historical control. There was no statistically significant increase in the risk of study exit related to carbamazepine use. Nine (7.6%) and five patients (8.3%) remained seizure-free during the 10-week monotherapy period, while taking ESL 1,600 and 1,200 mg, respectively. The reductions in median standardized seizure frequency (seizures per 28 days) between baseline and the 18-week treatment period were: ESL 1,600 mg, 42% and 1,200 mg, 31%. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurring in ≥ 10% of patients were dizziness, headache, fatigue, somnolence, nausea, and nasopharyngitis. The TEAE most frequently leading to discontinuation was hyponatremia (2.1%).

Significance: ESL was efficacious and well tolerated as monotherapy in North American patients, and led to a reduction in seizure frequency. Exit rates for ESL 1,600 and 1,200 mg QD were superior to the historical control; the difference in exit rates between doses was not statistically significant.

Citing Articles

A real-world pharmacovigilance analysis of eslicarbazepine acetate using the FDA adverse events reporting system (FAERS) database from 2013 (Q4) to 2024 (Q1).

Tang H, Xu J, Zhang X, Chen C, Song G, Ma R Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1463560.

PMID: 39372199 PMC: 11449726. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1463560.


Efficacy and tolerability of antiseizure drugs.

Hakami T Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2021; 14:17562864211037430.

PMID: 34603506 PMC: 8481725. DOI: 10.1177/17562864211037430.


Comparative Economic Outcomes in Patients with Focal Seizure Initiating First-Line Eslicarbazepine Acetate Monotherapy versus Generic Antiseizure Drugs.

Mehta D, Davis M, Epstein A, Wensel B, Grinnell T, Williams G Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021; 13:251-261.

PMID: 33907433 PMC: 8064618. DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S303079.


Impact of Early Initiation of Eslicarbazepine Acetate on Economic Outcomes Among Patients with Focal Seizure: Results from Retrospective Database Analyses.

Mehta D, Davis M, Epstein A, Wensel B, Grinnell T, Williams G Neurol Ther. 2020; 9(2):585-598.

PMID: 32949379 PMC: 7606418. DOI: 10.1007/s40120-020-00211-6.


Long-term efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy for adults with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy: An open-label extension study.

Trinka E, Rocamora R, Chaves J, Moreira J, Ikedo F, Soares-da-Silva P Epilepsia. 2020; 61(10):2129-2141.

PMID: 32944934 PMC: 7693183. DOI: 10.1111/epi.16666.


References
1.
Perucca E, Tomson T . The pharmacological treatment of epilepsy in adults. Lancet Neurol. 2011; 10(5):446-56. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70047-3. View

2.
Wechsler R, Li G, French J, OBrien T, DCruz O, Williams P . Conversion to lacosamide monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy: results from a historical-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study. Epilepsia. 2014; 55(7):1088-98. PMC: 4477913. DOI: 10.1111/epi.12681. View

3.
Perucca E, French J, Bialer M . Development of new antiepileptic drugs: challenges, incentives, and recent advances. Lancet Neurol. 2007; 6(9):793-804. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70215-6. View

4.
French J, Temkin N, Shneker B, Hammer A, Caldwell P, Messenheimer J . Lamotrigine XR conversion to monotherapy: first study using a historical control group. Neurotherapeutics. 2011; 9(1):176-84. PMC: 3271149. DOI: 10.1007/s13311-011-0088-3. View

5.
Borghs S, de la Loge C, Cramer J . Defining minimally important change in QOLIE-31 scores: estimates from three placebo-controlled lacosamide trials in patients with partial-onset seizures. Epilepsy Behav. 2012; 23(3):230-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.12.023. View