» Articles » PMID: 25665107

Resection and Reconstruction of Pelvic Bone Tumors

Overview
Journal Orthopedics
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2015 Feb 10
PMID 25665107
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess outcome and recurrence rate after limb-salvage surgery with reconstruction for pelvic bone tumors and analyze complications and their relationship with surgery. The authors analyzed 129 patients followed for a mean of 6 years (range, 2-19 years). Chondrosarcoma was the most frequent histotype. Thirty-one cases with no acetabular involvement were reconstructed with allograft only. Acetabular resections were reconstructed with allograft prosthetic composite (n=60), allograft only (n=11), trabecular metal components (n=2), prosthesis only (n=10), saddle prosthesis (n=11), and iliofemoral arthrodesis (n=1). Margins were wide (n=94), wide contaminated (n=22), marginal (n=7), and intralesional (n=6). Oncologic outcomes were as follows: 75 patients were continuously disease free, 6 were disease free after treatment of relapse, 13 were alive with disease, 28 were dead of disease, and 5 were dead of other causes. Survival was 66% at 10 years. Local recurrence rate of malignant tumors was 22.1% and was not statistically influenced by margins (P=.140) or site (P=.933). Metastasis rate was 32.8%. Deep infection was observed in 30 (23.6%) cases, with no statistical difference between reconstructions with and without allograft (P=.09). Final external hemipelvectomy was performed in 16 cases. Newer techniques of reconstruction using stemmed acetabular cups or porous metal components combined with allograft are now available. Local control and satisfactory survival is achievable long term in patients with pelvic tumors, but this surgery implies a high rate of complications. Infection is a major complication, not influenced by the use of allografts. Amputation is rarely needed.

Citing Articles

External Hemipelvectomy in Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Are They Still Needed?.

Ramos Pascua L, Casas Ramos P, De la Cruz Gutierrez L, Negri M, Vilar Gonzalez E, Cordova Peralta J Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(22).

PMID: 39594784 PMC: 11593110. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16223828.


Three-Dimensional Multimodality Image Reconstruction as Teaching Tool for Case-based learning among medical postgraduates: a focus on primary pelvic bone Tumour Education.

Hu X, Wang Y, Li J, Qing P, Yang X, Zeng J BMC Med Educ. 2023; 23(1):944.

PMID: 38087270 PMC: 10717389. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04916-8.


3D printing for patient-specific implants in musculoskeletal oncology.

Kotrych D, Angelini A, Bohatyrewicz A, Ruggieri P EFORT Open Rev. 2023; 8(5):331-339.

PMID: 37158428 PMC: 10233802. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-23-0066.


Custom-Made 3D-Printed Prosthesis after Resection of a Voluminous Giant Cell Tumour Recurrence in Pelvis.

Khal A, Apostu D, Schiau C, Bejinariu N, Pesenti S, Jouve J Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(3).

PMID: 36766590 PMC: 9914636. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13030485.


Custom designed and 3D-printed titanium pelvic implants for acetabular reconstruction after tumour resection.

Broekhuis D, Boyle R, Karunaratne S, Chua A, Stalley P Hip Int. 2022; 33(5):905-915.

PMID: 36408844 PMC: 10486168. DOI: 10.1177/11207000221135068.