» Articles » PMID: 25643082

Ultrasound-induced Heart Rate Decrease: Role of the Vagus Nerve

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The goal of this study is to investigate the role of the vagus nerve (VN) in the ultrasound (US)-induced negative chronotropic effect (deceased heart rate). One of the functions of the VN is to mediate lowering of the heart rate. A previous study showed a decrease of ~20% in the heart rate but the mechanism of the effect was not investigated. Sprague Dawley rats (n = 20) were exposed transthoracically to ultrasonic pulses at an approximate duty factor of 1% with sequentially 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 MPa peak rarefactional pressure amplitudes (PRPAs). The ultrasonic exposure parameters herein were chosen to match those of the previous study to have confidence that an ultrasound-induced negative chronotropic effect would occur. For each of the three PRPA sequences, the pulse repetition frequency (PRF) started slightly greater than the rat's heart rate and then was decreased sequentially in 1-Hz steps every 10 s (i.e., 6, 5, and 4 Hz for a total duration of 30 s). The experiments were organized in a standard (2 × 2) factorial design with VN (cut versus intact) as one factor and US (on versus off) as another factor. VN (intact/cut) and US (on/off) groups were divided into four groups each consisting of 5 animals: 1) VN intact-US off, 2) VN intact-US on, 3) VN cut-US off, and 4) VN cut-US on. Two-way analysis of variance for repeated measures was used to compare heart rate, cardiac output, systolic volume, ejection fraction, end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, respiratory rate, and arterial pressure before and after ultrasound stimulation. In this study, the heart rate decreased ~4% for the non-vagotomy and vagotomy groups. The ultrasound effect was significant for heart rate (p = 0.02) and cardiac output (p = 0.005) at 3 min post US exposure; the vagotomy effect was not significant. For heart rate, the Bonferroni test showed no differences between the four groups. The vagotomy group showed similar ultrasound-induced cardiac effects compared with the non-vagotomy group, suggesting that the vagus nerve is not influenced by the ultrasound exposure procedures. The US application caused a negative chronotropic effect of the rat heart without affecting the hemodynamic conditions. The results at this point are suggestive for an alternative cardiac pacing capability.

Citing Articles

Investigation of the Effects of Cardiovascular Therapeutic Ultrasound Applied in Female and Male Rats' Hearts of Different Ages.

C Coiado O, Yerrabelli R, Christensen A, Wozniak M, OBrien W IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2021; 69(1):166-180.

PMID: 34543195 PMC: 8848473. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2021.3113867.


Positive chronotropic effect caused by transthoracic ultrasound in heart of rats.

C Coiado O, Yerrabelli R, Christensen A, Wozniak M, Lucas A, OBrien Jr W JASA Express Lett. 2021; 1(8):082001.

PMID: 34396365 PMC: 8340500. DOI: 10.1121/10.0005764.


The Negative Chronotropic Effect in Rat Heart Stimulated by Ultrasonic Pulses: Role of Sex and Age.

C Coiado O, OBrien Jr W J Ultrasound Med. 2017; 36(4):799-808.

PMID: 28072471 PMC: 5359037. DOI: 10.7863/ultra.16.02017.


Electroacupuncture Ameliorates the Coronary Occlusion Related Tachycardia and Hypotension in Acute Rat Myocardial Ischemia Model: Potential Role of Hippocampus.

Wu S, Cao J, Zhang T, Zhou Y, Wang K, Zhu G Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015; 2015:925987.

PMID: 26221181 PMC: 4499623. DOI: 10.1155/2015/925987.

References
1.
SMAILYS A, Dulevicius Z, Muckus K, Dauksa K . Investigation of the possibilities of cardiac defibrillation by ultrasound. Resuscitation. 1981; 9(3):233-42. DOI: 10.1016/0300-9572(81)90043-5. View

2.
MacRobbie A, Raeman C, Child S, Dalecki D . Thresholds for premature contractions in murine hearts exposed to pulsed ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1997; 23(5):761-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(97)00049-5. View

3.
Pang S, Scott T . Use of the common carotid artery in blood pressure measurement in rats. A possible source of error. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1980; 58(9):1126-7. DOI: 10.1139/y80-169. View

4.
Rota C, Raeman C, Child S, Dalecki D . Detection of acoustic cavitation in the heart with microbubble contrast agents in vivo: a mechanism for ultrasound-induced arrhythmias. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006; 120(5 Pt 1):2958-64. DOI: 10.1121/1.2346132. View

5.
Dalecki D, Raeman C, Carstensen E . Effects of pulsed ultrasound on the frog heart: II. An investigation of heating as a potential mechanism. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1993; 19(5):391-8. DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(93)90058-v. View