Influence of Age at Revision Cochlear Implantation on Speech Perception Outcomes
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Importance: This study reviewed whether advanced age should be a consideration when revision cochlear implantation is warranted.
Objective: To examine whether age at revision cochlear implantation is related to postrevision speech perception performance.
Design, Setting, And Participants: A retrospective analysis was performed in an academic tertiary care center. Participants included 14 younger adults (<65 years) and 15 older adults (≥65 years) who underwent revision cochlear implantation.
Intervention: Revision cochlear implantation.
Main Outcomes And Measures: Speech perception performance, as measured with consonant-nucleus-consonant [CNC] words in quiet, at the best prerevision interval as well as the 3- and 6-month postrevision intervals were compared between the 2 cohorts. The CNC word test consists of 10 lists of 50 phonemically balanced monosyllabic words, scored with a range of 0% to 100% correct.
Results: Both cohorts experienced a restoration in speech perception scores after revision cochlear implantation compared with their best performance before the revision (mean [SD] CNC word test scores for the younger cohort: 43.9% [25.6%] before revision and 47.7% [21.3%] at 3 months and 47.6% [19.8%] at 6 months after revision; for the older cohort: 36.3% [19.1%] before revision and 35.3% [17.2%] at 3 months and 39.9% [16.3%] at 6 months after revision; F₂,₅₄= 0.93; P = .40). There was no interaction between age at revision surgery and speech perception performance at each assessment interval (F₂,₅₄= 0.51; P = .60).
Conclusions And Relevance: In this study, age at revision cochlear implantation was not related to postrevision speech perception performance. Advanced age should not be considered a contraindication to revision cochlear implantation.
Speech perception in patients submitted to cochlear reimplantation.
Costa L, Vicente L, Silva L, Alvarenga K, Salgado M, Costa O Codas. 2024; 36(4):e20230220.
PMID: 38922246 PMC: 11296668. DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20242023220pt.
Rates, Indications, and Speech Perception Outcomes of Revision Cochlear Implantations.
Sagiv D, Yaar-Soffer Y, Yakir Z, Henkin Y, Shapira Y J Clin Med. 2021; 10(15).
PMID: 34361999 PMC: 8347537. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10153215.
Safety and outcomes of cochlear implantation in the elderly: A review of recent literature.
Yang Z, Cosetti M J Otol. 2018; 11(1):1-6.
PMID: 29937803 PMC: 6002585. DOI: 10.1016/j.joto.2016.03.004.
Cochlear implantation in the elderly: outcomes, long-term evolution, and predictive factors.
Garcia-Iza L, Martinez Z, Ugarte A, Fernandez M, Altuna X Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018; 275(4):913-922.
PMID: 29480360 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-018-4910-y.
Phenomenological needs assessment of parents of children with cochlear implants.
Mostafavi F, Hazavehei S, Oryadi-Zanjani M, Rad G, Rezaianzadeh A, Ravanyar L Electron Physician. 2017; 9(9):5339-5348.
PMID: 29038719 PMC: 5633235. DOI: 10.19082/5339.