Increasing BCI Communication Rates with Dynamic Stopping Towards More Practical Use: an ALS Study

Overview

Journal J Neural Eng

Specialties Biomedical Engineering
Neurology

Date 2015 Jan 15

PMID 25588137

Citations 22

Authors

B O Mainsah

L M Collins

K A Colwell

E W Sellers

D B Ryan

K Caves

C S Throckmorton

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: The P300 speller is a brain-computer interface (BCI) that can possibly restore communication abilities to individuals with severe neuromuscular disabilities, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), by exploiting elicited brain signals in electroencephalography (EEG) data. However, accurate spelling with BCIs is slow due to the need to average data over multiple trials to increase the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the elicited brain signals. Probabilistic approaches to dynamically control data collection have shown improved performance in non-disabled populations; however, validation of these approaches in a target BCI user population has not occurred.

Approach: We have developed a data-driven algorithm for the P300 speller based on Bayesian inference that improves spelling time by adaptively selecting the number of trials based on the acute SNR of a user's EEG data. We further enhanced the algorithm by incorporating information about the user's language. In this current study, we test and validate the algorithms online in a target BCI user population, by comparing the performance of the dynamic stopping (DS) (or early stopping) algorithms against the current state-of-the-art method, static data collection, where the amount of data collected is fixed prior to online operation.

Main Results: Results from online testing of the DS algorithms in participants with ALS demonstrate a significant increase in communication rate as measured in bits/min (100-300%), and theoretical bit rate (100-550%), while maintaining selection accuracy. Participants also overwhelmingly preferred the DS algorithms.

Significance: We have developed a viable BCI algorithm that has been tested in a target BCI population which has the potential for translation to improve BCI speller performance towards more practical use for communication.

Citing Articles

Exploring the 'EarSwitch' concept: a novel ear based control method for assistive technology.

Hoyle A, Stevenson R, Leonhardt M, Gillett T, Martinez-Hernandez U, Gompertz N J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):210.

PMID: 39623474 PMC: 11613744. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01500-z.

Digital Alternative Communication for Individuals with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: What We Have.

Fernandes F, Barbalho I, Bispo Junior A, Alves L, Nagem D, Lins H J Clin Med. 2023; 12(16).

PMID: 37629277 PMC: 10455505. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165235.

Brain-Computer Interfaces, Completely Locked-In State in Neurodegenerative Diseases, and End-of-Life Decisions.

Poppe C, Elger B J Bioeth Inq. 2023; 21(1):19-27.

PMID: 37466825 PMC: 11052847. DOI: 10.1007/s11673-023-10256-5.

Language Model-Guided Classifier Adaptation for Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication.

Chen X, Collins L, Mainsah B Conf Proc IEEE Int Conf Syst Man Cybern. 2023; 2022:1642-1647.

PMID: 36776946 PMC: 9910722. DOI: 10.1109/smc53654.2022.9945561.

Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Visual Evoked Potential-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces for Motor Rehabilitation Applications: Systematic Review and Future Directions.

Gutierrez-Martinez J, Mercado-Gutierrez J, Carvajal-Gamez B, Rosas-Trigueros J, Contreras-Martinez A Front Hum Neurosci. 2021; 15:772837.

PMID: 34899220 PMC: 8656949. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.772837.

References

Lin E, Polich J . P300 habituation patterns: individual differences from ultradian rhythms. Percept Mot Skills. 1999; 88(3 Pt 2):1111-25. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1999.88.3c.1111. View

Cedarbaum J, Stambler N, Malta E, Fuller C, Hilt D, Thurmond B . The ALSFRS-R: a revised ALS functional rating scale that incorporates assessments of respiratory function. BDNF ALS Study Group (Phase III). J Neurol Sci. 1999; 169(1-2):13-21. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-510x(99)00210-5. View

McFarland D, Sarnacki W, Wolpaw J . Brain-computer interface (BCI) operation: optimizing information transfer rates. Biol Psychol. 2003; 63(3):237-51. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0511(03)00073-5. View

Serby H, Yom-Tov E, Inbar G . An improved P300-based brain-computer interface. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2005; 13(1):89-98. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2004.841878. View

Sellers E, Donchin E . A P300-based brain-computer interface: initial tests by ALS patients. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006; 117(3):538-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.06.027. View

Krusienski D, Sellers E, Cabestaing F, Bayoudh S, McFarland D, Vaughan T . A comparison of classification techniques for the P300 Speller. J Neural Eng. 2006; 3(4):299-305. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/3/4/007. View

Hoffmann U, Vesin J, Ebrahimi T, Diserens K . An efficient P300-based brain-computer interface for disabled subjects. J Neurosci Methods. 2007; 167(1):115-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.005. View

Heinrich S, Bach M . Signal and noise in P300 recordings to visual stimuli. Doc Ophthalmol. 2008; 117(1):73-83. DOI: 10.1007/s10633-007-9107-4. View

Lenhardt A, Kaper M, Ritter H . An adaptive P300-based online brain-computer interface. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2008; 16(2):121-30. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2007.912816. View

10.

Nijboer F, Sellers E, Mellinger J, Jordan M, Matuz T, Furdea A . A P300-based brain-computer interface for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008; 119(8):1909-1916. PMC: 2853977. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.03.034. View

11.

Zhang H, Guan C, Wang C . Asynchronous P300-based brain-computer interfaces: a computational approach with statistical models. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008; 55(6):1754-63. DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2008.919128. View

12.

Kleih S, Nijboer F, Halder S, Kubler A . Motivation modulates the P300 amplitude during brain-computer interface use. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010; 121(7):1023-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.01.034. View

13.

Townsend G, LaPallo B, Boulay C, Krusienski D, Frye G, Hauser C . A novel P300-based brain-computer interface stimulus presentation paradigm: moving beyond rows and columns. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010; 121(7):1109-20. PMC: 2879474. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.01.030. View

14.

Liu T, Goldberg L, Gao S, Hong B . An online brain-computer interface using non-flashing visual evoked potentials. J Neural Eng. 2010; 7(3):036003. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/7/3/036003. View

15.

Treder M, Blankertz B . (C)overt attention and visual speller design in an ERP-based brain-computer interface. Behav Brain Funct. 2010; 6:28. PMC: 2904265. DOI: 10.1186/1744-9081-6-28. View

16.

Sellers E, Vaughan T, Wolpaw J . A brain-computer interface for long-term independent home use. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2010; 11(5):449-55. DOI: 10.3109/17482961003777470. View

17.

Nijboer F, Birbaumer N, Kubler A . The influence of psychological state and motivation on brain-computer interface performance in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - a longitudinal study. Front Neurosci. 2010; 4. PMC: 2916671. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2010.00055. View

18.

Hohne J, Schreuder M, Blankertz B, Tangermann M . Two-dimensional auditory p300 speller with predictive text system. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010; 2010:4185-8. DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627379. View

19.

Ryan D, Frye G, Townsend G, Berry D, Mesa-G S, Gates N . Predictive spelling with a P300-based brain-computer interface: Increasing the rate of communication. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2011; 27(1):69-84. PMC: 3029027. DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2011.535754. View

20.

Mak J, Arbel Y, Minett J, McCane L, Yuksel B, Ryan D . Optimizing the P300-based brain-computer interface: current status, limitations and future directions. J Neural Eng. 2011; 8(2):025003. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/025003. View