» Articles » PMID: 25575504

Age-dependent Speciation Can Explain the Shape of Empirical Phylogenies

Overview
Journal Syst Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2015 Jan 11
PMID 25575504
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tens of thousands of phylogenetic trees, describing the evolutionary relationships between hundreds of thousands of taxa, are readily obtainable from various databases. From such trees, inferences can be made about the underlying macroevolutionary processes, yet remarkably these processes are still poorly understood. Simple and widely used evolutionary null models are problematic: Empirical trees show very different imbalance between the sizes of the daughter clades of ancestral taxa compared to what models predict. Obtaining a simple evolutionary model that is both biologically plausible and produces the imbalance seen in empirical trees is a challenging problem, to which none of the existing models provide a satisfying answer. Here we propose a simple, biologically plausible macroevolutionary model in which the rate of speciation decreases with species age, whereas extinction rates can vary quite generally. We show that this model provides a remarkable fit to the thousands of trees stored in the online database TreeBase. The biological motivation for the identified age-dependent speciation process may be that recently evolved taxa often colonize new regions or niches and may initially experience little competition. These new taxa are thus more likely to give rise to further new taxa than a taxon that has remained largely unchanged and is, therefore, well adapted to its niche. We show that age-dependent speciation may also be the result of different within-species populations following the same laws of lineage splitting to produce new species. As the fit of our model to the tree database shows, this simple biological motivation provides an explanation for a long standing problem in macroevolution.

Citing Articles

Fossils improve extinction-rate estimates under state-dependent diversification models.

do Rosario Petrucci B, May M, Heath T Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025; 380(1919):20230313.

PMID: 39976401 PMC: 11867151. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0313.


A Diffusion-Based Approach for Simulating Forward-in-Time State-Dependent Speciation and Extinction Dynamics.

Soewongsono A, Landis M ArXiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38351931 PMC: 10862938.


The Limits of the Constant-rate Birth-Death Prior for Phylogenetic Tree Topology Inference.

Khurana M, Scheidwasser-Clow N, Penn M, Bhatt S, Duchene D Syst Biol. 2023; 73(1):235-246.

PMID: 38153910 PMC: 11129600. DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syad075.


A vectorial tree distance measure.

Priel A, Tamir B Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):5256.

PMID: 35347186 PMC: 8960910. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08360-4.


On asymptotic joint distributions of cherries and pitchforks for random phylogenetic trees.

Choi K, Kaur G, Wu T J Math Biol. 2021; 83(4):40.

PMID: 34554333 PMC: 8460594. DOI: 10.1007/s00285-021-01667-2.


References
1.
Steel M, Mckenzie A . Properties of phylogenetic trees generated by Yule-type speciation models. Math Biosci. 2001; 170(1):91-112. DOI: 10.1016/s0025-5564(00)00061-4. View

2.
Pybus O, Harvey P . Testing macro-evolutionary models using incomplete molecular phylogenies. Proc Biol Sci. 2001; 267(1459):2267-72. PMC: 1690817. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1278. View

3.
Heard S, Mooers A . Signatures of random and selective mass extinctions in phylogenetic tree balance. Syst Biol. 2003; 51(6):889-97. DOI: 10.1080/10635150290102591. View

4.
Pinelis I . Evolutionary models of phylogenetic trees. Proc Biol Sci. 2003; 270(1522):1425-31. PMC: 1691382. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2374. View

5.
Blum M, Francois O . Which random processes describe the tree of life? A large-scale study of phylogenetic tree imbalance. Syst Biol. 2006; 55(4):685-91. DOI: 10.1080/10635150600889625. View