» Articles » PMID: 20799036

Calculations for Multi-type Age-dependent Binary Branching Processes

Overview
Journal J Math Biol
Date 2010 Aug 28
PMID 20799036
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This article provides a method for calculating the joint probability density for the topology and the node times of a tree which has been produced by an multi-type age-dependent binary branching process and then sampled at a given time. These processes are a generalization, in two ways, of the constant rate birth-death process. There are a finite number of types of particle instead of a single type: each particle behaves in the same way as all others of the same type, but different types can behave differently. Secondly, the lifetime of a particle (before it either dies, changes to another type, or splits into 2) follows an arbitrary distribution, instead of the exponential lifetime in the constant rate case. Two applications concern models for macroevolution: the particles represent species, and the extant species are randomly sampled. In one application, 1-type and 2-type models for macroevolution are compared. The other is aimed at Bayesian phylogenetic analysis where the models considered here can provide a more realistic and more robust prior distribution over trees than is usually used. A third application is in the study of cell proliferation, where various types of cell can divide and differentiate.

Citing Articles

A Bayesian phylodynamic inference framework for single-cell CRISPR/Cas9 lineage tracing barcode data with dependent target sites.

Zwaans A, Seidel S, Manceau M, Stadler T Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025; 380(1919):20230318.

PMID: 39976408 PMC: 11867110. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0318.


A Two-State Model of Tree Evolution and Its Applications to Alu Retrotransposition.

Moshiri N, Mirarab S Syst Biol. 2017; 67(3):475-489.

PMID: 29165679 PMC: 5920319. DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syx088.


Phylodynamics with Migration: A Computational Framework to Quantify Population Structure from Genomic Data.

Kuhnert D, Stadler T, Vaughan T, Drummond A Mol Biol Evol. 2016; 33(8):2102-16.

PMID: 27189573 PMC: 4948704. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msw064.


Topology and inference for Yule trees with multiple states.

Popovic L, Rivas M J Math Biol. 2016; 73(5):1251-1291.

PMID: 27009067 DOI: 10.1007/s00285-016-0992-6.


Age-dependent speciation can explain the shape of empirical phylogenies.

Hagen O, Hartmann K, Steel M, Stadler T Syst Biol. 2015; 64(3):432-40.

PMID: 25575504 PMC: 4395845. DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syv001.

References
1.
Heath T, Zwickl D, Kim J, Hillis D . Taxon sampling affects inferences of macroevolutionary processes from phylogenetic trees. Syst Biol. 2008; 57(1):160-6. DOI: 10.1080/10635150701884640. View

2.
Yang Z, Rannala B . Branch-length prior influences Bayesian posterior probability of phylogeny. Syst Biol. 2005; 54(3):455-70. DOI: 10.1080/10635150590945313. View

3.
Kirxpatrick M, Slatkin M . SEARCHING FOR EVOLUTIONARY PATTERNS IN THE SHAPE OF A PHYLOGENETIC TREE. Evolution. 2017; 47(4):1171-1181. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb02144.x. View

4.
Drummond A, Ho S, Phillips M, Rambaut A . Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biol. 2006; 4(5):e88. PMC: 1395354. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040088. View

5.
Blum M, Francois O . Which random processes describe the tree of life? A large-scale study of phylogenetic tree imbalance. Syst Biol. 2006; 55(4):685-91. DOI: 10.1080/10635150600889625. View