» Articles » PMID: 25566031

How Do Selective Attentional Processes Contribute to Maintenance and Recall in Children's Working Memory Capacity?

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2015 Jan 8
PMID 25566031
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The development of working memory capacity is considered from the perspective of the active maintenance of items in primary memory (PM) and a cue-dependent search component, secondary memory (SM). Using free recall, plus a more novel serial interleaved items task, age-related increases in PM estimates were evident in both paradigms. In addition to this, age-related improvements in attentional selectivity were observed, indexed by the recall of target and non-target information respectively. To further characterize PM, presentation modality was varied in the serial interleaved items task (auditory, visual and dual presentation). Developmental differences were found in the effectiveness of presentation formats. Older children's recall was enhanced by the combination of labeled visual items and enduring auditory information, whilst the same format was detrimental to younger children's recall of target information. The present results show how estimates of PM and SM in children relate to the development of working memory capacity, but measurement of these constructs in children is not straightforward. Data also points to age-related changes in selective attention, which in turn contributes to children's ability to process and maintain information in working memory.

Citing Articles

The Influence of Memory on Visual Perception in Infants, Children, and Adults.

Jaffe-Dax S, Potter C, Leung T, Emberson L, Lew-Williams C Cogn Sci. 2023; 47(11):e13381.

PMID: 37988257 PMC: 10754275. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.13381.


Charting the trajectory of forgetting: Insights from a working memory period paradigm.

Towse J, Hitch G, Horton N Mem Cognit. 2019; 47(6):1063-1075.

PMID: 30811028 PMC: 6677677. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00916-6.


Contextual support for children's recall within working memory.

Roome H, Towse J, Crespo-Llado M Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018; 72(6):1364-1378.

PMID: 30239274 PMC: 6535801. DOI: 10.1177/1747021818804440.


Difference in Subjective Accessibility of On Demand Recall of Visual, Taste, and Olfactory Memories.

Zach P, Zimmelova P, Mrzilkova J, Kutova M Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018:1630437.

PMID: 29546049 PMC: 5818939. DOI: 10.1155/2018/1630437.


Quantifying attentional effects on the fidelity and biases of visual working memory in young children.

Guillory S, Gliga T, Kaldy Z J Exp Child Psychol. 2017; 167:146-161.

PMID: 29175705 PMC: 5750077. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.10.005.


References
1.
Towse J, Cowan N, Hitch G, Horton N . The recall of information from working memory. Insights from behavioural and chronometric perspectives. Exp Psychol. 2009; 55(6):371-83. PMC: 2658622. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.6.371. View

2.
Unsworth N, Spillers G, Brewer G . The contributions of primary and secondary memory to working memory capacity: an individual differences analysis of immediate free recall. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010; 36(1):240-7. DOI: 10.1037/a0017739. View

3.
Hagen J . The effect of distraction on selective attention. Child Dev. 1967; 38(3):685-94. View

4.
Unsworth N, Brewer G, Spillers G . Inter- and intra-individual variation in immediate free recall: an examination of serial position functions and recall initiation strategies. Memory. 2011; 19(1):67-82. DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2010.535658. View

5.
Unsworth N, Engle R . The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychol Rev. 2007; 114(1):104-32. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.104. View