An Improvement of the 2ˆ(-delta Delta CT) Method for Quantitative Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction Data Analysis

Overview

Journal Biostat Bioinforma Biomath

Date 2015 Jan 6

PMID 25558171

Citations 872

Authors

Xiayu Rao

Xuelin Huang

Zhicheng Zhou

Xin Lin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The 2 method has been extensively used as a relative quantification strategy for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) data analysis. This method is a convenient way to calculate relative gene expression levels between different samples in that it directly uses the threshold cycles () generated by the qPCR system for calculation. However, this approach relies heavily on an invalid assumption of 100% PCR amplification efficiency across all samples. In addition, the 2 method is applied to data with automatic removal of background fluorescence by the qPCR software. Since the background fluorescence is unknown, subtracting an inaccurate background can lead to distortion of the results. To address these problems, we present an improved method, the individual efficiency corrected calculation.

Results: Our method takes into account the PCR efficiency of each individual sample. In addition, it eliminates the need for background fluorescence estimation or subtraction because the background can be cancelled out using the differencing strategy. The DNA amount for a certain gene and the relative DNA amount among different samples estimated using our method were closer to the true values compared to the results of the 2 method.

Conclusions: The improved method, the individual efficiency corrected calculation, produces more accurate estimates in relative gene expression than the 2 method and is thus a better way to calculate relative gene expression.

Citing Articles

Identification of the Valine-Glutamine gene family in Chenopodium quinoa Willd and analysis of its expression pattern and subcellular localization under drought stress.

Zhang D, Zhu X, Du X, Wang X, Wang B, Wei X BMC Genomics. 2025; 26(1):252.

PMID: 40087573 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-025-11313-6.

Exploring Metabolic Pathways and Gene Mining During Cotton Flower Bud Differentiation Stages Based on Transcriptomics and Metabolomics.

Yang M, Li W, Fu X, Lu J, Ma L, Wang H Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(5).

PMID: 40076894 PMC: 11901054. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26052277.

Native potential probiotics and postbiotics improve the gut-kidney axis by the modulation of autophagy signaling pathway.

Jouriani F, Rezaie N, Ashrafian F, Aghamohammad S, Rohani M Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2025; .

PMID: 40072702 DOI: 10.1007/s12223-025-01253-9.

Silencing of hindered flowering and boll cracking in upland cotton.

Xu W, Ma Q, Ju J, Zhang X, Yuan W, Hai H Front Plant Sci. 2025; 16:1558293.

PMID: 40070717 PMC: 11893620. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1558293.

Associations of essential trace metals with telomere length in general population: a cross-sectional study.

Rong J, Liu Q, Zhang T, Lu Y, Ye Z, Teng K Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8387.

PMID: 40069335 PMC: 11897380. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-93216-w.

References

Su J, Zhang R, Dong J, Yang C . Evaluation of internal control genes for qRT-PCR normalization in tissues and cell culture for antiviral studies of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2011; 30(3):830-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2011.01.006. View

Mygind T, Birkelund S, Birkebaek N, Ostergaard L, Jensen J, Christiansen G . Determination of PCR efficiency in chelex-100 purified clinical samples and comparison of real-time quantitative PCR and conventional PCR for detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae. BMC Microbiol. 2002; 2:17. PMC: 117782. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-2-17. View

Bas A, Forsberg G, Hammarstrom S, Hammarstrom M . Utility of the housekeeping genes 18S rRNA, beta-actin and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase for normalization in real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis of gene expression in human T lymphocytes. Scand J Immunol. 2004; 59(6):566-73. DOI: 10.1111/j.0300-9475.2004.01440.x. View

Rutledge R . Sigmoidal curve-fitting redefines quantitative real-time PCR with the prospective of developing automated high-throughput applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004; 32(22):e178. PMC: 545475. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gnh177. View

Shain E, Clemens J . A new method for robust quantitative and qualitative analysis of real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 36(14):e91. PMC: 2504305. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkn408. View

Ramakers C, Ruijter J, Lekanne Deprez R, Moorman A . Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data. Neurosci Lett. 2003; 339(1):62-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)01423-4. View

Livak K, Schmittgen T . Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2002; 25(4):402-8. DOI: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. View

Tichopad A, Dilger M, Schwarz G, Pfaffl M . Standardized determination of real-time PCR efficiency from a single reaction set-up. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003; 31(20):e122. PMC: 219490. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gng122. View

Winer J, Jung C, Shackel I, Williams P . Development and validation of real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction for monitoring gene expression in cardiac myocytes in vitro. Anal Biochem. 1999; 270(1):41-9. DOI: 10.1006/abio.1999.4085. View

10.

Schmittgen T, Livak K . Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc. 2008; 3(6):1101-8. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2008.73. View

11.

Bar T, Stahlberg A, Muszta A, Kubista M . Kinetic Outlier Detection (KOD) in real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003; 31(17):e105. PMC: 212825. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gng106. View

12.

Guescini M, Sisti D, Rocchi M, Stocchi L, Stocchi V . A new real-time PCR method to overcome significant quantitative inaccuracy due to slight amplification inhibition. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008; 9:326. PMC: 2533027. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-326. View

13.

Schmittgen T, Zakrajsek B, Mills A, Gorn V, Singer M, Reed M . Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction to study mRNA decay: comparison of endpoint and real-time methods. Anal Biochem. 2000; 285(2):194-204. DOI: 10.1006/abio.2000.4753. View

14.

Schefe J, Lehmann K, Buschmann I, Unger T, Funke-Kaiser H . Quantitative real-time RT-PCR data analysis: current concepts and the novel "gene expression's CT difference" formula. J Mol Med (Berl). 2006; 84(11):901-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00109-006-0097-6. View

15.

Pfaffl M, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians T . Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper--Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett. 2004; 26(6):509-15. DOI: 10.1023/b:bile.0000019559.84305.47. View

16.

Rebrikov D, Trofimov D . [Real-time PCR: approaches to data analysis (a review)]. Prikl Biokhim Mikrobiol. 2006; 42(5):520-8. View

17.

Rocha-Martins M, Njaine B, Silveira M . Avoiding pitfalls of internal controls: validation of reference genes for analysis by qRT-PCR and Western blot throughout rat retinal development. PLoS One. 2012; 7(8):e43028. PMC: 3423434. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043028. View

18.

Arocho A, Chen B, Ladanyi M, Pan Q . Validation of the 2-DeltaDeltaCt calculation as an alternate method of data analysis for quantitative PCR of BCR-ABL P210 transcripts. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2006; 15(1):56-61. DOI: 10.1097/00019606-200603000-00009. View

19.

Swillens S, Dessars B, El Housni H . Revisiting the sigmoidal curve fitting applied to quantitative real-time PCR data. Anal Biochem. 2007; 373(2):370-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2007.10.019. View

20.

Liu W, Saint D . A new quantitative method of real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay based on simulation of polymerase chain reaction kinetics. Anal Biochem. 2002; 302(1):52-9. DOI: 10.1006/abio.2001.5530. View