» Articles » PMID: 18667053

A New Real-time PCR Method to Overcome Significant Quantitative Inaccuracy Due to Slight Amplification Inhibition

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2008 Aug 1
PMID 18667053
Citations 80
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Real-time PCR analysis is a sensitive DNA quantification technique that has recently gained considerable attention in biotechnology, microbiology and molecular diagnostics. Although, the cycle-threshold (Ct) method is the present "gold standard", it is far from being a standard assay. Uniform reaction efficiency among samples is the most important assumption of this method. Nevertheless, some authors have reported that it may not be correct and a slight PCR efficiency decrease of about 4% could result in an error of up to 400% using the Ct method. This reaction efficiency decrease may be caused by inhibiting agents used during nucleic acid extraction or copurified from the biological sample. We propose a new method (Cy0) that does not require the assumption of equal reaction efficiency between unknowns and standard curve.

Results: The Cy0 method is based on the fit of Richards' equation to real-time PCR data by nonlinear regression in order to obtain the best fit estimators of reaction parameters. Subsequently, these parameters were used to calculate the Cy0 value that minimizes the dependence of its value on PCR kinetic. The Ct, second derivative (Cp), sigmoidal curve fitting method (SCF) and Cy0 methods were compared using two criteria: precision and accuracy. Our results demonstrated that, in optimal amplification conditions, these four methods are equally precise and accurate. However, when PCR efficiency was slightly decreased, diluting amplification mix quantity or adding a biological inhibitor such as IgG, the SCF, Ct and Cp methods were markedly impaired while the Cy0 method gave significantly more accurate and precise results.

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that Cy0 represents a significant improvement over the standard methods for obtaining a reliable and precise nucleic acid quantification even in sub-optimal amplification conditions overcoming the underestimation caused by the presence of some PCR inhibitors.

Citing Articles

The TWW Growth Model and Its Application in the Analysis of Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction.

Tabatabai M, Wilus D, Singh K, Wallace T Bioinform Biol Insights. 2024; 18():11779322241290126.

PMID: 39568449 PMC: 11577475. DOI: 10.1177/11779322241290126.


Explaining the impact of mutations on quantification of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater.

Endo N, Nihei Y, Fujita T, Yasojima M, Daigo F, Takemori H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):12482.

PMID: 38816525 PMC: 11139995. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62659-y.


Effects of Eribulin on the RNA Content of Extracellular Vesicles Released by Metastatic Breast Cancer Cells.

Giulietti M, Piva F, Cecati M, Maggio S, Guescini M, Saladino T Cells. 2024; 13(6.

PMID: 38534323 PMC: 10969587. DOI: 10.3390/cells13060479.


Effect of target gene sequence evenness and dominance on real-time PCR quantification of artificial sulfate-reducing microbial communities.

Du Z, Behrens S PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0299930.

PMID: 38452018 PMC: 10919606. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299930.


Towards identification of postharvest fruit quality transcriptomic markers in Malus domestica.

Hadish J, Hargarten H, Zhang H, Mattheis J, Honaas L, Ficklin S PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0297015.

PMID: 38446822 PMC: 10917293. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297015.


References
1.
Bustin S, Mueller R . Real-time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) and its potential use in clinical diagnosis. Clin Sci (Lond). 2005; 109(4):365-79. DOI: 10.1042/CS20050086. View

2.
Kontanis E, Reed F . Evaluation of real-time PCR amplification efficiencies to detect PCR inhibitors. J Forensic Sci. 2006; 51(4):795-804. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00182.x. View

3.
Livak K, Flood S, Marmaro J, Giusti W, Deetz K . Oligonucleotides with fluorescent dyes at opposite ends provide a quenched probe system useful for detecting PCR product and nucleic acid hybridization. PCR Methods Appl. 1995; 4(6):357-62. DOI: 10.1101/gr.4.6.357. View

4.
Gingeras T, Higuchi R, Kricka L, Lo Y, Wittwer C . Fifty years of molecular (DNA/RNA) diagnostics. Clin Chem. 2005; 51(3):661-71. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.045336. View

5.
Marubini E, Verderio P, Raggi C, Pazzagli M, Orlando C . Statistical diagnostics emerging from external quality control of real-time PCR. Int J Biol Markers. 2004; 19(2):141-6. DOI: 10.1177/172460080401900209. View