» Articles » PMID: 25534902

Narrative Review Comparing the Benefits of and Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation in High-, Middle- and Low-income Countries

Overview
Journal Heart Lung Circ
Date 2014 Dec 24
PMID 25534902
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity worldwide. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a comprehensive secondary prevention approach, with established benefits in reducing morbidity in high-income countries (HICs). The objectives of this review were to summarise what is known about the benefits of CR, including consideration of cost-effectiveness, in addition to rates of CR participation and adherence in high-, as well as low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Methods: A literature search of Medline, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), and Google Scholar was conducted for published articles from database inception to October 2013. The search was first directed to identify meta-analyses and reviews reporting on the benefits of CR. Then, the search was focussed to identify articles reporting CR participation and dropout rates. Full-text versions of relevant abstracts were summarised qualitatively.

Results: Based on meta-analysis, CR significantly reduced all-cause mortality by 13%-26%, cardiac mortality by 20%-36%, myocardial re-infarction by 25%-47%, and risk factors. CR is cost-effective in HICs. In LMICs, CR is demonstrated to reduce risk factors, with no studies on mortality or cost-effectiveness. Based on available data, CR participation rates are <50% in the majority of countries, with documented dropout rates up to 56% and 82% in high- and middle-income countries, respectively.

Conclusions: CR is a beneficial intervention for heart patients in high and LMICs, but is underutilised with low participation and adherence rates worldwide. While more research is needed in LMICs, strategies shown to increase participation and program adherence should be implemented.

Citing Articles

Identification of personal factors that influence engagement in cardiac rehabilitation and interventions targeting personal factors: A scoping review protocol.

Zhang H, Sezgin D PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0318265.

PMID: 39888967 PMC: 11785271. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318265.


Perspectives of Policymakers on Barriers to and Enablers of the Uptake of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Saudi Arabia: A Qualitative Study.

Almoghairi A, OBrien J, Duff J J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2025; 36(4):371-380.

PMID: 39781229 PMC: 11708906. DOI: 10.37616/2212-5043.1405.


Reducing dropout rates in cardiac rehabilitation among cardiac patients in a vulnerable situation: systematic development and feasibility testing of the Heart Priority Programme.

Ibsen C, Katholm K, Jakobsen A, Eriksen G, Lysdal L, Nielsen U BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1579.

PMID: 39695726 PMC: 11653820. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-12073-x.


Comparative effectiveness of different interventions on adherence to exercise-based CR among patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Xia C, Zheng Y, Ji L, Liu H BMC Nurs. 2024; 23(1):897.

PMID: 39695575 PMC: 11657924. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02561-0.


Barriers to Cardiac Rehabilitation Enrollment and Secondary Prevention Adherence in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Cross-sectional Survey.

Almoghairi A, OBrien J, Doubrovsky A, Duff J J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2024; 36(3):252-262.

PMID: 39468998 PMC: 11517995. DOI: 10.37616/2212-5043.1392.


References
1.
Turk-Adawi K, Sarrafzadegan N, Grace S . Global availability of cardiac rehabilitation. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014; 11(10):586-96. PMC: 4490895. DOI: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.98. View

2.
Intarakamhang P, Intarakamhang U . Effects of the comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation program on psychological factors and quality of life among coronary heart disease patients. Glob J Health Sci. 2013; 5(2):145-52. PMC: 4776774. DOI: 10.5539/gjhs.v5n2p145. View

3.
Fidan D, Unal B, Critchley J, Capewell S . Economic analysis of treatments reducing coronary heart disease mortality in England and Wales, 2000-2010. QJM. 2007; 100(5):277-89. DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcm020. View

4.
Bethell H, Lewin R, Evans J, Turner S, Allender S, Petersen S . Outpatient cardiac rehabilitation attendance in England: variability by region and clinical characteristics. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2008; 28(6):386-91. DOI: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e31818c3b44. View

5.
Gendler Y, Geulayov G, Ziv A, Novikov I, Dankner R . [A multicenter intervention study on referral to cardiac rehabilitation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a 1-year follow-up of rehabilitation rates among USSR-born and veteran Israeli patients]. Harefuah. 2013; 151(9):511-7, 558, 557. View