Comparative Effectiveness of Different Interventions on Adherence to Exercise-based CR Among Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview

Journal BMC Nurs

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Medical Education

Date 2024 Dec 19

PMID 39695575

Authors

Chengyu Xia

Yingjun Zheng

Liuxia Ji

Hui Liu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Exercise-based phase II cardiac rehabilitation is critical for post-PCI patients, but adherence to exercise-based phase II cardiac rehabilitation remains low. Many studies aimed at improving adherence have been conducted in recent years, but the most effective interventions remain unclear. Hence, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and ranks of various interventions in enhancing adherence to exercise-based phase II cardiac rehabilitation for post-PCI patients.

Methods: A network meta-analysis employing random effects was utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of different interventions. Bias evaluation was performed via the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool, with data analysis performed using STATA v15.0. The surface under the cumulative ranking was used to estimate the rankings among different interventions.

Results: In the final analysis, 30 RCTs with 4267 patients across 17 different interventions were included. The results showed that patients who received home-based cardiac rehabilitation combined with mobile health intervention had the best adherence to exercise-based phase II cardiac rehabilitation (83.8%), followed by hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation combined with mobile health intervention (79.9%).

Conclusions: This network meta-analysis identified home-based CR + mobile health intervention and hospital-based CR + mobile health intervention as the top two ranked interventions for improving adherence to exercise-based phase II CR in post-PCI patients. Healthcare providers may consider prioritizing the use of home-based cardiac rehabilitation combined with mobile health intervention in clinical practice, but still need to evaluate factors such as patient preference and Medicare reimbursement availability to develop customized interventions that are not only safe and effective but also satisfying to the patient.

References

Wasilewski M, Vijayakumar A, Szigeti Z, Sathakaran S, Wang K, Saporta A . Barriers and Facilitators to Delivering Inpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023; 16:2361-2376. PMC: 10440091. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S418803. View

Rouse B, Chaimani A, Li T . Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians. Intern Emerg Med. 2016; 12(1):103-111. PMC: 5247317. DOI: 10.1007/s11739-016-1583-7. View

Antoniou V, Kapreli E, Davos C, Batalik L, Pepera G . Safety and long-term outcomes of remote cardiac rehabilitation in coronary heart disease patients: A systematic review. Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241237661. PMC: 10964460. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241237661. View

Yudi M, Clark D, Tsang D, Jelinek M, Kalten K, Joshi S . SMARTphone-based, early cardiac REHABilitation in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a randomized controlled trial. Coron Artery Dis. 2020; 32(5):432-440. DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000938. View

Dibben G, Faulkner J, Oldridge N, Rees K, Thompson D, Zwisler A . Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2023; 44(6):452-469. PMC: 9902155. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac747. View

Widmer R, Allison T, Lerman L, Lerman A . Digital Health Intervention as an Adjunct to Cardiac Rehabilitation Reduces Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Rehospitalizations. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2015; 8(5):283-92. PMC: 4690207. DOI: 10.1007/s12265-015-9629-1. View

Su J, Yu D, Paguio J . Effect of eHealth cardiac rehabilitation on health outcomes of coronary heart disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2019; 76(3):754-772. DOI: 10.1111/jan.14272. View

Eysenbach G . CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of Web-based and mobile health interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2012; 13(4):e126. PMC: 3278112. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1923. View

Trinquart L, Chatellier G, Ravaud P . Adjustment for reporting bias in network meta-analysis of antidepressant trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012; 12:150. PMC: 3537713. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-150. View

10.

Rinfret S, Baron S, Cohen D . Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Finally Mature Enough. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 65(23):2508-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.041. View

11.

. Influence on lifestyle measures and five-year coronary risk by a comprehensive lifestyle intervention programme in patients with coronary heart disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2003; 10(6):429-37. DOI: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000107024.38316.6a. View

12.

Varnfield M, Karunanithi M, Lee C, Honeyman E, Arnold D, Ding H . Smartphone-based home care model improved use of cardiac rehabilitation in postmyocardial infarction patients: results from a randomised controlled trial. Heart. 2014; 100(22):1770-9. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305783. View

13.

Higgins J, Thompson S . Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21(11):1539-58. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1186. View

14.

Arrigo I, Brunner-LaRocca H, Lefkovits M, Pfisterer M, Hoffmann A . Comparative outcome one year after formal cardiac rehabilitation: the effects of a randomized intervention to improve exercise adherence. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008; 15(3):306-11. DOI: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3282f40e01. View

15.

Antoniou V, Davos C, Kapreli E, Batalik L, Panagiotakos D, Pepera G . Effectiveness of Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation, Using Wearable Sensors, as a Multicomponent, Cutting-Edge Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(13). PMC: 9267864. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11133772. View

16.

Benz Scott L, Gravely S, Sexton T, Brzostek S, Brown D . Effect of patient navigation on enrollment in cardiac rehabilitation. JAMA Intern Med. 2012; 173(3):244-6. DOI: 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.1042. View

17.

Griffith J, Roark R, SIMPSON D . Contingency management in outpatient methadone treatment: a meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000; 58(1-2):55-66. DOI: 10.1016/s0376-8716(99)00068-x. View

18.

Widmer R, Allison T, Lennon R, Lopez-Jimenez F, Lerman L, Lerman A . Digital health intervention during cardiac rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial. Am Heart J. 2017; 188:65-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.02.016. View

19.

Kebapci A, Ozkaynak M, Lareau S . Effects of eHealth-Based Interventions on Adherence to Components of Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019; 35(1):74-85. DOI: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000619. View

20.

Jansons P, Haines T, OBrien L . Interventions to achieve ongoing exercise adherence for adults with chronic health conditions who have completed a supervised exercise program: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2016; 31(4):465-477. DOI: 10.1177/0269215516653995. View