» Articles » PMID: 25491347

Zinc Supplementation Reduced DNA Breaks in Ethiopian Women

Overview
Journal Nutr Res
Date 2014 Dec 11
PMID 25491347
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Assessment of zinc status remains a challenge largely because serum/plasma zinc may not accurately reflect an individual's zinc status. The comet assay, a sensitive method capable of detecting intracellular DNA strand breaks, may serve as a functional biomarker of zinc status. We hypothesized that effects of zinc supplementation on intracellular DNA damage could be assessed from samples collected in field studies in Ethiopia using the comet assay. Forty women, from villages where reported consumption of meat was less than once per month and phytate levels were high, received 20 mg zinc as zinc sulfate or placebo daily for 17 days in a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Plasma zinc concentrations were determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Cells from whole blood at the baseline and end point of the study were embedded in agarose, electrophoresed, and stained before being scored by an investigator blinded to the treatments. Although zinc supplementation did not significantly affect plasma zinc, mean (± SEM) comet tail moment measurement of supplemented women decreased from 39.7 ± 2.7 to 30.0 ± 1.8 (P< .005), indicating a decrease in DNA strand breaks in zinc-supplemented individuals. These findings demonstrated that the comet assay could be used as a functional assay to assess the effects of zinc supplementation on DNA integrity in samples collected in a field setting where food sources of bioavailable zinc are limited. Furthermore, the comet assay was sufficiently sensitive to detect changes in zinc status as a result of supplementation despite no significant changes in plasma zinc.

Citing Articles

Zinc as a Mechanism-Based Strategy for Mitigation of Metals Toxicity.

Hudson L, Dashner-Titus E, MacKenzie D Curr Environ Health Rep. 2025; 12(1):5.

PMID: 39827326 PMC: 11742765. DOI: 10.1007/s40572-025-00474-x.


Methods of Assessment of Zinc Status in Humans: An Updated Review and Meta-analysis.

Ceballos-Rasgado M, Brazier A, Gupta S, Moran V, Pierella E, Fekete K Nutr Rev. 2024; 83(3):e778-e800.

PMID: 38917458 PMC: 11819495. DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuae072.


Correlation between Selenium and Zinc Levels and Survival among Prostate Cancer Patients.

Pietrzak S, Marciniak W, Derkacz R, Matuszczak M, Kiljanczyk A, Baszuk P Nutrients. 2024; 16(4).

PMID: 38398851 PMC: 10891521. DOI: 10.3390/nu16040527.


Biochemical Markers of Zinc Nutrition.

Wang X, Zhang M, Ma J, Tie Y, Wang S Biol Trace Elem Res. 2024; 202(12):5328-5338.

PMID: 38319550 DOI: 10.1007/s12011-024-04091-x.


Advancing nutrition science to meet evolving global health needs.

Neufeld L, Ho E, Obeid R, Tzoulis C, Green M, Huber L Eur J Nutr. 2023; 62(Suppl 1):1-16.

PMID: 38015211 PMC: 10684707. DOI: 10.1007/s00394-023-03276-9.


References
1.
Hotz C, Gibson R . Traditional food-processing and preparation practices to enhance the bioavailability of micronutrients in plant-based diets. J Nutr. 2007; 137(4):1097-100. DOI: 10.1093/jn/137.4.1097. View

2.
Ho E . Zinc deficiency, DNA damage and cancer risk. J Nutr Biochem. 2004; 15(10):572-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2004.07.005. View

3.
Ostling O, Johanson K . Microelectrophoretic study of radiation-induced DNA damages in individual mammalian cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1984; 123(1):291-8. DOI: 10.1016/0006-291x(84)90411-x. View

4.
Abebe Y, Bogale A, Hambidge K, Stoecker B, Arbide I, Teshome A . Inadequate intakes of dietary zinc among pregnant women from subsistence households in Sidama, Southern Ethiopia. Public Health Nutr. 2007; 11(4):379-86. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980007000389. View

5.
Hartmann A, Agurell E, Beevers C, Brendler-Schwaab S, Burlinson B, CLAY P . Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay. 4th International Comet Assay Workshop. Mutagenesis. 2002; 18(1):45-51. DOI: 10.1093/mutage/18.1.45. View