Biomarker-based Asthma Phenotypes of Corticosteroid Response
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Asthma is a heterogeneous disease with different phenotypes. Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy is a mainstay of treatment for asthma, but the clinical response to ICSs is variable.
Objective: We hypothesized that a panel of inflammatory biomarkers (ie, fraction of exhaled nitric oxide [Feno], sputum eosinophil count, and urinary bromotyrosine [BrTyr] level) might predict steroid responsiveness.
Methods: The original study from which this analysis originates comprised 2 phases: a steroid-naive phase 1 and a 28-day trial of ICSs (phase 2) during which Feno values, sputum eosinophil counts, and urinary BrTyr levels were measured. The response to ICSs was based on clinical improvements, including a 12% or greater increase in FEV1, a 0.5-point or greater decrease in Asthma Control Questionnaire score, and 2 doubling dose or greater increase in provocative concentration of adenosine 5'-monophosphate causing a 20% decrease in FEV1 (PC20AMP). Healthy control subjects were also evaluated in this study for comparison of biomarkers with those seen in asthmatic patients.
Results: Asthmatic patients had higher than normal Feno values, sputum eosinophil counts, and urinary BrTyr levels during the steroid-naive phase and after ICS therapy. After 28-day trial of ICSs, Feno values decreased in 82% of asthmatic patients, sputum eosinophil counts decreased in 60%, and urinary BrTyr levels decreased in 58%. Each of the biomarkers at the steroid-naive phase had utility for predicting steroid responsiveness, but the combination of high Feno values and high urinary BrTyr levels had the best power (13.3-fold, P < .01) to predict a favorable response to ICS therapy. However, the magnitude of the decrease in biomarker levels was unrelated to the magnitude of clinical response to ICS therapy.
Conclusion: A noninvasive panel of biomarkers in steroid-naive asthmatic patients predicts clinical responsiveness to ICS therapy.
Breath and Sputum Analyses in Asthmatic Patients: An Overview.
Soccio P, Quarato C, Tondo P, Lacedonia D, Hoxhallari A, Foschino Barbaro M Cells. 2024; 13(16).
PMID: 39195245 PMC: 11353195. DOI: 10.3390/cells13161355.
Discovery and Validation of a Volatile Signature of Eosinophilic Airway Inflammation in Asthma.
Peltrini R, Cordell R, Wilde M, Abuhelal S, Quek E, Zounemat-Kermani N Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024; 210(9):1101-1112.
PMID: 38820123 PMC: 11544360. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202310-1759OC.
Domiciliary monitoring of exhaled nitric oxide in the management of asthma: a pilot study.
Li H, Lin J, Zhang Q, Wang J, Li C BMC Pulm Med. 2024; 24(1):244.
PMID: 38760654 PMC: 11102187. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-024-03031-8.
Eosinophilic Asthma: Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Horizons.
Hussain M, Liu G Cells. 2024; 13(5.
PMID: 38474348 PMC: 10931088. DOI: 10.3390/cells13050384.
Oda T, Iwamoto H, Takeno S, Kawasumi T, Takemoto K, Nishida M Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(10).
PMID: 37893494 PMC: 10608782. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59101776.