» Articles » PMID: 25475740

Association of BRCA1/2 Defects with Genomic Scores Predictive of DNA Damage Repair Deficiency Among Breast Cancer Subtypes

Abstract

Introduction: Homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair is of clinical relevance in breast cancer. Three DNA-based homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scores (HRD-loss of heterozygosity score (LOH), HRD-telomeric allelic imbalance score (TAI), and HRD-large-scale state transition score (LST)) have been developed that are highly correlated with defects in BRCA1/2, and are associated with response to platinum therapy in triple negative breast and ovarian cancer. This study examines the frequency of BRCA1/2 defects among different breast cancer subtypes, and the ability of the HRD scores to identify breast tumors with defects in the homologous recombination DNA repair pathway.

Methods: 215 breast tumors representing all ER/HER2 subtypes were obtained from commercial vendors. Next-generation sequencing based assays were used to generate genome wide SNP profiles, BRCA1/2 mutation screening, and BRCA1 promoter methylation data.

Results: BRCA1/2 deleterious mutations were observed in all breast cancer subtypes. BRCA1 promoter methylation was observed almost exclusively in triple negative breast cancer. BRCA1/2 deficient tumors were identified with BRCA1/2 mutations, or BRCA1 promoter methylation, and loss of the second allele of the affected gene. All three HRD scores were highly associated with BRCA1/2 deficiency (HRD-LOH: P = 1.3 × 10(-17); HRD-TAI: P = 1.5 × 10(-19); HRD-LST: P = 3.5 × 10(-18)). A combined score (HRD-mean) was calculated using the arithmetic mean of the three scores. In multivariable analyses the HRD-mean score captured significant BRCA1/2 deficiency information not captured by the three individual scores, or by clinical variables (P values for HRD-Mean adjusted for HRD-LOH: P = 1.4 × 10(-8); HRD-TAI: P = 2.9 × 10(-7); HRD-LST: P = 2.8 × 10(-8); clinical variables: P = 1.2 × 10(-16)).

Conclusions: The HRD scores showed strong correlation with BRCA1/2 deficiency regardless of breast cancer subtype. The frequency of elevated scores suggests that a significant proportion of all breast tumor subtypes may carry defects in the homologous recombination DNA repair pathway. The HRD scores can be combined to produce a more robust predictor of HRD. The combination of a robust score, and the FFPE compatible assay described in this study, may facilitate use of agents targeting homologous recombination DNA repair in the clinical setting.

Citing Articles

Divide and Conquer-Targeted Therapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Nedeljkovic M, Vuletic A, Mirjacic Martinovic K Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(4).

PMID: 40003864 PMC: 11855393. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26041396.


Prognostic Impact of Stimulator of Interferon Genes Expression in Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

Maeda T, Ono M, Osako T, Chiba T, Baba S, Iesato A Cancer Med. 2025; 14(4):e70666.

PMID: 39967410 PMC: 11836529. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70666.


Assessment of candidate high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma predisposition genes through integrated germline and tumour sequencing.

Subramanian D, Zethoven M, Pishas K, Marinovic E, McInerny S, Rowley S NPJ Genom Med. 2025; 10(1):1.

PMID: 39794353 PMC: 11724014. DOI: 10.1038/s41525-024-00447-3.


The impact of homologous recombination deficiency on the prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Su H, Wang Y, Chao X, Wu H, You Y, Zhao S Clin Transl Med. 2024; 15(1):e70143.

PMID: 39724505 PMC: 11670307. DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.70143.


Co-regulator activity of Mediator of DNA Damage Checkpoint 1 (MDC1) is associated with DNA repair dysfunction and PARP inhibitor sensitivity in lobular carcinoma of the breast.

Sottnik J, Shackleford M, Nesiba C, Richer A, Swartz J, Rowland C bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39677775 PMC: 11642799. DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.29.564555.


References
1.
Foulkes W, Stefansson I, Chappuis P, Begin L, Goffin J, Wong N . Germline BRCA1 mutations and a basal epithelial phenotype in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003; 95(19):1482-5. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djg050. View

2.
Beaudet A, Tsui L . A suggested nomenclature for designating mutations. Hum Mutat. 1993; 2(4):245-8. DOI: 10.1002/humu.1380020402. View

3.
Atchley D, Albarracin C, Lopez A, Valero V, Amos C, Gonzalez-Angulo A . Clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients with BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(26):4282-8. PMC: 6366335. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6231. View

4.
Young S, Pilarski R, Donenberg T, Shapiro C, Hammond L, Miller J . The prevalence of BRCA1 mutations among young women with triple-negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2009; 9:86. PMC: 2666759. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-86. View

5.
Hu X, Stern H, Ge L, OBrien C, Haydu L, Honchell C . Genetic alterations and oncogenic pathways associated with breast cancer subtypes. Mol Cancer Res. 2009; 7(4):511-22. DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0107. View