» Articles » PMID: 25429825

Quantitative Assessment of New MRI-based Measurements to Differentiate Low and High Stages of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using Support Vector Machines

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2014 Nov 29
PMID 25429825
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction And Hypothesis: The objective of this study was to quantitatively assess the ability of new MRI-based measurements to differentiate low and high stages of pelvic organ prolapse. New measurements representing pelvic structural characteristics are proposed and analyzed using support vector machines (SVM).

Methods: This retrospective study used data from 207 women with different types and stages of prolapse. Their demographic information, clinical history, and dynamic MRI data were obtained from the database. New MRI measurements were extracted and analyzed based on these reference lines: pubococcygeal line (PCL), mid-pubic line (MPL), true conjugate line (TCL), obstetric conjugate line (OCL), and diagonal conjugate line (DCL). A classification model using SVM was designed to assess the impact of the features (variables) in classifying prolapse into low or high stage.

Results: The classification model using SVM can accurately identified anterior prolapse with very high accuracy (>0.90), and apical and posterior prolapse with good accuracy (0.80 - 0.90). Two newly proposed MRI-based features were found to be significant in the identification of anterior and posterior prolapse: the angle between TCL and MPL for anterior prolapse, and the angle between DCL and PCL for posterior prolapse. The overall accuracy of posterior prolapse identification increased from 47% to 80% when the newly proposed MRI-based features were taken into consideration.

Conclusions: The proposed MRI-based measurements are effective in differentiating low and high stages of pelvic organ prolapse, particularly for posterior prolapse.

Citing Articles

Multi-label classification of pelvic organ prolapse using stress magnetic resonance imaging with deep learning.

Wang X, He D, Feng F, Ashton-Miller J, DeLancey J, Luo J Int Urogynecol J. 2022; 33(10):2869-2877.

PMID: 35083500 PMC: 9325920. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-05064-7.


Feasibility of a deep learning-based method for automated localization of pelvic floor landmarks using stress MR images.

Feng F, Ashton-Miller J, DeLancey J, Luo J Int Urogynecol J. 2021; 32(11):3069-3075.

PMID: 33475815 PMC: 8292443. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04626-5.

References
1.
Cortes E, Reid W, Singh K, Berger L . Clinical examination and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in vaginal vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103(1):41-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000102704.29607.FC. View

2.
Gousse A, Barbaric Z, Safir M, Madjar S, Marumoto A, Raz S . Dynamic half Fourier acquisition, single shot turbo spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating the female pelvis. J Urol. 2000; 164(5):1606-13. View

3.
Onal S, Lai-Yuen S, Bao P, Weitzenfeld A, Hart S . MRI-based segmentation of pubic bone for evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2014; 18(4):1370-8. DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2014.2302437. View

4.
Lienemann A, Sprenger D, Janssen U, Grosch E, Pellengahr C, Anthuber C . Assessment of pelvic organ descent by use of functional cine-MRI: which reference line should be used?. Neurourol Urodyn. 2003; 23(1):33-7. DOI: 10.1002/nau.10170. View

5.
Bump R, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker L, DeLancey J, Klarskov P . The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175(1):10-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70243-0. View