» Articles » PMID: 10701605

Dynamic MR Imaging of the Pelvic Floor in Asymptomatic Subjects

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2000 Mar 4
PMID 10701605
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Dynamic MR imaging may be used as an alternative to dynamic cystoproctography for the evaluation of pelvic floor prolapse and configuration. MR criteria for normality are derived from proctographic studies because no large MR study of asymptomatic individuals has been performed. Our study aimed to define the normal range of dynamic pelvic MR appearances in a large group of asymptomatic individuals.

Subjects And Methods: Fifty healthy adult volunteers (25 men and 25 women; age range, 20-66 years; mean age, 34 years) were prospectively recruited and examined using dynamic MR imaging. All subjects were interviewed and established as healthy using a validated questionnaire. Axial, coronal, and sagittal MR imaging was performed at rest and during maximum pelvic strain using a static 1.0-T unit and a fast-field-echo sequence, providing 10 slices in 31 sec. Standardized measurements of pelvic configuration were taken, and rest and strain imaging were compared to determine the range of normal appearances.

Results: Three women developed a cystocele during maximum pelvic strain, two of whom also showed grade 1 uterocervical prolapse, which was also seen in another woman. Three men showed posterior pelvic floor descent in excess of 3 cm during straining. No rectocele, enterocele, rectal prolapse, or perineal hernia was seen in any subject.

Conclusion: The normal range of pelvic organ descent in asymptomatic subjects seen on dynamic MR imaging included cystocele, uterocervical prolapse, and excessive anorectal junction descent. Although we encountered pelvic prolapse in seven volunteers, it was infrequent and low grade, suggesting that criteria for abnormality derived from proctography are generally applicable to MR imaging.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Perineal Descent Measurements on Pelvic Floor Imaging.

van Gruting I, Kluivers K, Stankiewicz A, IntHout J, van Delft K, Thakar R J Clin Med. 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39860553 PMC: 11766426. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020548.


Magnetic Resonance Imaging Template to Standardize Reporting of Evacuation Disorders.

Piloni V, Manisco T, Fogante M J Imaging. 2024; 10(12).

PMID: 39728199 PMC: 11677394. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging10120302.


Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Evaluation.

Sarpietro G, Foti P, Conte C, Matarazzo M Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(12).

PMID: 38138177 PMC: 10744532. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59122074.


Pelvic floor muscles after prostate radiation therapy: morpho-functional assessment by magnetic resonance imaging, surface electromyography and digital anal palpation.

Ribeiro A, Nammur L, Mateus-Vasconcelos E, Ferreira C, Muglia V, Oliveira H Int Braz J Urol. 2020; 47(1):120-130.

PMID: 33047917 PMC: 7712707. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0765.


Development of Upright Computed Tomography With Area Detector for Whole-Body Scans: Phantom Study, Efficacy on Workflow, Effect of Gravity on Human Body, and Potential Clinical Impact.

Jinzaki M, Yamada Y, Nagura T, Nakahara T, Yokoyama Y, Narita K Invest Radiol. 2019; 55(2):73-83.

PMID: 31503082 PMC: 6948833. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000603.