» Articles » PMID: 25429128

Single-trial Properties of Place Cells in Control and CA1 NMDA Receptor Subunit 1-KO Mice

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2014 Nov 28
PMID 25429128
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The NMDA receptor plays a key role in synaptic plasticity and its disruption leads to impaired spatial representation in the CA1 area of the hippocampus, with place cells exhibiting larger place fields (McHugh et al., 1996). Place fields are defined by the spatial and nonspatial inputs of a given place and context, by intrinsic network processes, such as phase precession, but also by the matching of these inputs to a pre-existing spatial representation. Larger place fields may be a consequence of spatially widened firing upon a single crossing of a place field, or of increased variability in place field positions across traversals. We addressed this question by monitoring CA1 place cell activity, with tetrodes, in control and KO mice lacking the NMDA receptor in this region. In individual crossings of the field, we found no difference between genotypes in place field size; the larger, overall place field size turns out to be a consequence of jitter across trials. We suggest that this jitter reflects a deficit in the matching of current spatial inputs to the stored spatial representation of the track. This is supported by the finding that deficits in place field size and spatial information are rescued by extensive exposure of the mouse to the track, which may echo an increased influence of memory retrieval processes in CA3 on firing in CA1.

Citing Articles

Hippocampal place code plasticity in CA1 requires postsynaptic membrane fusion.

Plitt M, Kaganovsky K, Sudhof T, Giocomo L bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 38045362 PMC: 10690209. DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.20.567978.


Editorial: Updates on memory modulation in health and disease.

Miranda M, Giachero M, Weisstaub N, Morici J Front Behav Neurosci. 2023; 17:1205371.

PMID: 37214642 PMC: 10193039. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1205371.


Zn inhibits spatial memory and hippocampal place cell representation through high-affinity binding to the NMDA receptor GluN2A subunit.

Sikora J, Di Bisceglie Caballero S, Reiss D, Kieffer B, Paoletti P, Jacob P iScience. 2022; 25(11):105355.

PMID: 36325055 PMC: 9619178. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105355.


Multiple-Timescale Representations of Space: Linking Memory to Navigation.

Tang W, Jadhav S Annu Rev Neurosci. 2021; 45:1-21.

PMID: 34936810 PMC: 10021996. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-111020-084824.


Linking hippocampal multiplexed tuning, Hebbian plasticity and navigation.

Moore J, Cushman J, Acharya L, Popeney B, Mehta M Nature. 2021; 599(7885):442-448.

PMID: 34671157 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03989-z.


References
1.
Eichenbaum H, Dudchenko P, Wood E, Shapiro M, Tanila H . The hippocampus, memory, and place cells: is it spatial memory or a memory space?. Neuron. 1999; 23(2):209-26. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80773-4. View

2.
Jensen O, Lisman J . Hippocampal CA3 region predicts memory sequences: accounting for the phase precession of place cells. Learn Mem. 1996; 3(2-3):279-87. DOI: 10.1101/lm.3.2-3.279. View

3.
Mehta M, Quirk M, Wilson M . Experience-dependent asymmetric shape of hippocampal receptive fields. Neuron. 2000; 25(3):707-15. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81072-7. View

4.
Harris K, Henze D, Csicsvari J, Hirase H, Buzsaki G . Accuracy of tetrode spike separation as determined by simultaneous intracellular and extracellular measurements. J Neurophysiol. 2000; 84(1):401-14. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.401. View

5.
Ekstrom A, Meltzer J, McNaughton B, Barnes C . NMDA receptor antagonism blocks experience-dependent expansion of hippocampal "place fields". Neuron. 2001; 31(4):631-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00401-9. View