Adhesive Strength of Self-adhesive Resins to Lithium Disilicate Ceramic and Dentin: Effect of Dentin Chelating Agents

Overview

Journal Odontology

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2014 Nov 27

PMID 25424594

Authors

Samah Saker

Ahmad Alnazzawi

Mutlu Ozcan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test the effect of different chelating agents on microtensile bond strength (MTBS) of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. The occlusal surfaces of extracted human mandibular molars (N = 80) were cut horizontally to expose sound dentin. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n = 20 per group) and dentin surfaces were conditioned according to one of the following methods: group C: no treatment (control group); group CH: 0.2 % chitosan; group E: 17 % ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) and group P: 25 % polyacrylic acid (PAA). Lithium disilicate glass ceramic (e.max CAD) blocks were cemented to conditioned dentin surfaces with self-adhesive cements (RelyX Unicem or Clearfil SA) and photo-polymerized. Specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and thermocycled for 6,000 times. The beams were obtained from bonded ceramic-cement-tooth assemblies and were subjected to the MTBS test (1 mm/min). Failure types were analyzed and selected beams were examined under scanning electron microscope. Data (MPa) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (P < 0.05). While cement type significantly affected the MTBS results (P < 0.05), no significant difference was observed between the dentin chelating agents (P = 0.785). Interaction terms were not significant (P = 0.114). Control group with no dentin conditioning presented significantly lower results with both cements (RelyX Unicem: 8.1 ± 1.9(a), Clearfil SA: 8 ± 1.6(a)) than those of conditioned groups (19.3 ± 4.2(b)-24.5 ± 5.2(b)) (P < 0.05). Failure types were predominantly adhesive in all groups. Chitosan (2 %), EDTA (17 %) or PAA (25 %) could all be used as dentin chelating agents in conjunction with self-adhesive resin cements tested.

References

Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Kramer N . Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior. Oper Dent. 2001; 25(6):459-65. View

Passos S, Tomomitsu Kimpara E, Bottino M, Junior G, Rizkalla A . Bond strength of different resin cement and ceramic shades bonded to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2013; 15(5):461-6. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a29591. View

Nagai T, Kawamoto Y, Kakehashi Y, Matsumura H . Adhesive bonding of a lithium disilicate ceramic material with resin-based luting agents. J Oral Rehabil. 2005; 32(8):598-605. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01464.x. View

Sarac D, Sarac Y, Kulunk S, Kulunk T . Effect of the dentin cleansing techniques on dentin wetting and on the bond strength of a resin luting agent. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 94(4):363-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.07.009. View

Pavan S, Dos Santos P, Berger S, Bedran-Russo A . The effect of dentin pretreatment on the microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements. J Prosthet Dent. 2010; 104(4):258-64. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60134-5. View

Ferracane J, Stansbury J, Burke F . Self-adhesive resin cements - chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil. 2010; 38(4):295-314. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02148.x. View

Kambara K, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, Takahashi M, Thanatvarakorn O, Ichinose S . Effect of smear layer treatment on dentin bond of self-adhesive cements. Dent Mater J. 2012; 31(6):980-7. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2012-031. View

Grasso C, Caluori D, Goldstein G, Hittelman E . In vivo evaluation of three cleansing techniques for prepared abutment teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 88(4):437-41. DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2002.128123. View

Silva P, Guedes D, Pecora J, da Cruz-Filho A . Time-dependent effects of chitosan on dentin structures. Braz Dent J. 2012; 23(4):357-61. DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402012000400008. View

10.

Leirskar J, Nordbo H . The effect of zinc oxide-eugenol on the shear bond strength of a commonly used bonding system. Endod Dent Traumatol. 2001; 16(6):265-8. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016006265.x. View

11.

Saker S, Ibrahim F, Ozcan M . Effect of different surface treatments on adhesion of In-Ceram Zirconia to enamel and dentin substrates. J Adhes Dent. 2013; 15(4):369-76. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a29013. View

12.

Manuja N, Nagpal R, Pandit I . Dental adhesion: mechanism, techniques and durability. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012; 36(3):223-34. View

13.

Xie J, Powers J, McGuckin R . In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater. 1993; 9(5):295-9. DOI: 10.1016/0109-5641(93)90046-s. View

14.

Pashley D . Clinical correlations of dentin structure and function. J Prosthet Dent. 1991; 66(6):777-81. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90414-r. View

15.

Passos S, Souza R, Michida S, Zamboni S, Oliveira S . Effects of cement-curing mode and light-curing unit on the bond durability of ceramic cemented to dentin. Braz Oral Res. 2013; 27(2):169-75. DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242013005000005. View

16.

Mazzitelli C, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Ferrari M, Osorio R . Dentin treatment effects on the bonding performance of self-adhesive resin cements. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010; 118(1):80-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00703.x. View

17.

Dalby R, Ellakwa A, Millar B, Martin F . Influence of immediate dentin sealing on the shear bond strength of pressed ceramic luted to dentin with self-etch resin cement. Int J Dent. 2012; 2012:310702. PMC: 3263627. DOI: 10.1155/2012/310702. View

18.

de Castro H, Passos S, Villaca Zogheib L, Della Bona A . Effect of cement shade and light-curing unit on bond strength of a ceramic cemented to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2012; 14(2):155-60. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a22715. View

19.

Mormann W . The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006; 137 Suppl:7S-13S. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0398. View

20.

Feitosa V, Sauro S, Watson T, Correr A, Osorio R, Toledano M . Evaluation of the micro-mechanical strength of resin bonded-dentin interfaces submitted to short-term degradation strategies. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2012; 15:112-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.06.010. View