» Articles » PMID: 25399952

Socio-economic Dietary Inequalities in UK Adults: an Updated Picture of Key Food Groups and Nutrients from National Surveillance Data

Overview
Journal Br J Nutr
Date 2014 Nov 18
PMID 25399952
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Socio-economic differences in diet are a potential contributor to health inequalities. The present study provides an up-to-date picture of socio-economic differences in diet in the UK, focusing on the consumption of three food groups and two nutrients of public health concern: fruit and vegetables; red and processed meat; oily fish; saturated fats; non-milk extrinsic sugars (NMES). We analysed data for 1491 adults (age ≥ 19 years) from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey 2008-2011. Socio-economic indicators were household income, occupational social class and highest educational qualification. Covariate-adjusted estimates for intakes of fruit and vegetables, red and processed meat, and both nutrients were estimated using general linear models. Covariate-adjusted OR for oily fish consumption were derived with logistic regression models. We observed consistent socio-economic gradients in the consumption of the three food groups as estimated by all the three indicators. Contrasting highest and lowest levels of each socio-economic indicator, we observed significant differences in intakes for the three food groups and NMES. Depending on the socio-economic indicator, highest socio-economic groups consumed up to 128 g/d more fruit and vegetables, 26 g/d less red and processed meat, and 2·6% points less NMES (P< 0·05 for all). Relative to lowest socio-economic groups, highest socio-economic groups were 2·4 to 4·0 times more likely to eat oily fish. No significant patterns in saturated fat consumption were apparent. In conclusion, socio-economic differences were identified in the consumption of food groups and one nutrient of public health importance. Aligning dietary intakes with public health guidance may require interventions specifically designed to reduce health inequalities.

Citing Articles

Comparative determination of factors affecting attitude level towards healthy nutrition.

Ozdemir S, Baltaci F Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):5026.

PMID: 39934187 PMC: 11814383. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80128-4.


Who likes meat, fish, and seafood? Influence of sex, age, body mass index, smoking, and olfactory efficiency on meat product preferences.

Hartman-Petrycka M, Lebiedowska A, Kaminska M, Krusiec-Swidergol B, Blonska-Fajfrowska B, Witkos J Food Sci Nutr. 2024; 12(9):6799-6809.

PMID: 39554359 PMC: 11561781. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.4275.


Inequalities in diet quality by socio-demographic characteristics, smoking, and weight status in a large UK-based cohort using a new UK diet quality questionnaire-UKDQQ.

Roberts K, Stephenson J, Holdsworth M, Relton C, Williams E, Cade J J Nutr Sci. 2024; 13:e59.

PMID: 39464404 PMC: 11503710. DOI: 10.1017/jns.2024.60.


Changes in food habits during the transition to retirement: the Whitehall II cohort study.

Lagstrom H, Lahdenpera M, Ravyse C, Akbaraly T, Kivimaki M, Pentti J J Epidemiol Community Health. 2024; 79(2):131-137.

PMID: 39353723 PMC: 11874461. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2024-222690.


Early adulthood socioeconomic trajectories contribute to inequalities in adult diet quality, independent of childhood and adulthood socioeconomic position.

Tao Y, Maddock J, Howe L, Winpenny E J Epidemiol Community Health. 2024; 79(2):87-93.

PMID: 39299758 PMC: 11874354. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2024-222472.


References
1.
Kirkpatrick S, Reedy J, Butler E, Dodd K, Subar A, Thompson F . Dietary assessment in food environment research: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2013; 46(1):94-102. PMC: 4558887. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.08.015. View

2.
Power C, Manor O, Matthews S . Child to adult socioeconomic conditions and obesity in a national cohort. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003; 27(9):1081-6. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802323. View

3.
Watt H, Carson C, Lawlor D, Patel R, Ebrahim S . Influence of life course socioeconomic position on older women's health behaviors: findings from the British Women's Heart and Health Study. Am J Public Health. 2008; 99(2):320-7. PMC: 2622782. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.129288. View

4.
Hebert J, Clemow L, Pbert L, Ockene I, Ockene J . Social desirability bias in dietary self-report may compromise the validity of dietary intake measures. Int J Epidemiol. 1995; 24(2):389-98. DOI: 10.1093/ije/24.2.389. View

5.
McCartney D, Younger K, Walsh J, ONeill M, Sheridan C, Kearney J . Socio-economic differences in food group and nutrient intakes among young women in Ireland. Br J Nutr. 2013; 110(11):2084-97. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114513001463. View