» Articles » PMID: 25399249

Assessment-driven Selection and Adaptation of Exercise Difficulty in Robot-assisted Therapy: a Pilot Study with a Hand Rehabilitation Robot

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2014 Nov 17
PMID 25399249
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Selecting and maintaining an engaging and challenging training difficulty level in robot-assisted stroke rehabilitation remains an open challenge. Despite the ability of robotic systems to provide objective and accurate measures of function and performance, the selection and adaptation of exercise difficulty levels is typically left to the experience of the supervising therapist.

Methods: We introduce a patient-tailored and adaptive robot-assisted therapy concept to optimally challenge patients from the very first session and throughout therapy progress. The concept is evaluated within a four-week pilot study in six subacute stroke patients performing robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function. Robotic assessments of both motor and sensory impairments of hand function conducted prior to the therapy are used to adjust exercise parameters and customize difficulty levels. During therapy progression, an automated routine adapts difficulty levels from session to session to maintain patients' performance around a target level of 70%, to optimally balance motivation and challenge.

Results: Robotic assessments suggested large differences in patients' sensorimotor abilities that are not captured by clinical assessments. Exercise customization based on these assessments resulted in an average initial exercise performance around 70% (62% ± 20%, mean ± std), which was maintained throughout the course of the therapy (64% ± 21%). Patients showed reduction in both motor and sensory impairments compared to baseline as measured by clinical and robotic assessments. The progress in difficulty levels correlated with improvements in a clinical impairment scale (Fugl-Meyer Assessment) (r s = 0.70), suggesting that the proposed therapy was effective at reducing sensorimotor impairment.

Conclusions: Initial robotic assessments combined with progressive difficulty adaptation have the potential to automatically tailor robot-assisted rehabilitation to the individual patient. This results in optimal challenge and engagement of the patient, may facilitate sensorimotor recovery after neurological injury, and has implications for unsupervised robot-assisted therapy in the clinic and home environment.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02096445.

Citing Articles

Clinical validation of an individualized auto-adaptative serious game for combined cognitive and upper limb motor robotic rehabilitation after stroke.

Doumas I, Lejeune T, Edwards M, Stoquart G, Vandermeeren Y, Dehez B J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025; 22(1):10.

PMID: 39849588 PMC: 11756148. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-025-01551-w.


Unsupervised robot-assisted rehabilitation after stroke: feasibility, effect on therapy dose, and user experience.

Devittori G, Dinacci D, Romiti D, Califfi A, Petrillo C, Rossi P J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):52.

PMID: 38594727 PMC: 11005116. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01347-4.


A usability study on mobile EMG-guided wrist extension training in subacute stroke patients-MyoGuide.

Lin H, Xu Y, Zhang X, Woolley D, Zhao L, Liang W J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):39.

PMID: 38515192 PMC: 10956308. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01334-9.


Interactive curriculum learning increases and homogenizes motor smoothness.

Sungeelee V, Loriette A, Sigaud O, Caramiaux B Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):2843.

PMID: 38310201 PMC: 10838298. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53253-3.


Progressive Transition From Supervised to Unsupervised Robot-Assisted Therapy After Stroke: Protocol for a Single-Group, Interventional Feasibility Study.

Devittori G, Ranzani R, Dinacci D, Romiti D, Califfi A, Petrillo C JMIR Res Protoc. 2023; 12:e48485.

PMID: 37943580 PMC: 10667973. DOI: 10.2196/48485.


References
1.
Scott J, Huskisson E . Graphic representation of pain. Pain. 1976; 2(2):175-84. View

2.
Fugl-Meyer A, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S . The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975; 7(1):13-31. View

3.
Jack D, Boian R, Merians A, Tremaine M, Burdea G, Adamovich S . Virtual reality-enhanced stroke rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2001; 9(3):308-18. DOI: 10.1109/7333.948460. View

4.
Woldag H, Hummelsheim H . Evidence-based physiotherapeutic concepts for improving arm and hand function in stroke patients: a review. J Neurol. 2002; 249(5):518-28. DOI: 10.1007/s004150200058. View

5.
Lotze M, Braun C, Birbaumer N, Anders S, Cohen L . Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive. Brain. 2003; 126(Pt 4):866-72. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awg079. View