Effects of Robotic Upper Limb Treatment After Stroke on Cognitive Patterns: A Systematic Review

Background: Robotic therapy (RT) has been internationally recognized for the motor rehabilitation of the upper limb. Although it seems that RT can stimulate and promote neuroplasticity, the effectiveness of robotics in restoring cognitive deficits has been considered only in a few recent studies.

Objective: To verify whether, in the current state of the literature, cognitive measures are used as inclusion or exclusion criteria and/or outcomes measures in robotic upper limb rehabilitation in stroke patients.

Methods: The systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies eligible were identified through PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science from inception to March 2021.

Results: Eighty-one studies were considered in this systematic review. Seventy-three studies have at least a cognitive inclusion or exclusion criteria, while only seven studies assessed cognitive outcomes.

Conclusion: Despite the high presence of cognitive instruments used for inclusion/exclusion criteria their heterogeneity did not allow the identification of a guideline for the evaluation of patients in different stroke stages. Therefore, although the heterogeneity and the low percentage of studies that included cognitive outcomes, seemed that the latter were positively influenced by RT in post-stroke rehabilitation. Future larger RCTs are needed to outline which cognitive scales are most suitable and their cut-off, as well as what cognitive outcome measures to use in the various stages of post-stroke rehabilitation.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Executive Function, Attention, and Memory in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Le H, Honma K, Annaka H, Shunxiang S, Murakami T, Hiraoka T Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e75194.

PMID: 39759598 PMC: 11700524. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75194.

Synergy-based functional electrical stimulation and robotic-assisted for retraining reach-to-grasp in stroke: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Zhou H, Hu J, Yun R, Zhao Z, Lai M, Sun L BMC Neurol. 2023; 23(1):324.

PMID: 37700225 PMC: 10496180. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03369-2.

A Multiaxial Rehabilitation Programme for Workers with COVID-19 Sequelae Using a Conventional and Technological-Robotic Approach: The Proposal of INAIL and Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi.

Aprile I, Bramante L, La Russa C, Germanotta M, Barletta V, Falchini F Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(11).

PMID: 37297733 PMC: 10252900. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11111593.

References

Mehrholz J, Pollock A, Pohl M, Kugler J, Elsner B . Systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of robotic-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living and upper limb function after stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020; 17(1):83. PMC: 7325016. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-020-00715-0. View

Hsu H, Chiu H, Kuan T, Tsai C, Su F, Kuo L . Robotic-assisted therapy with bilateral practice improves task and motor performance in the upper extremities of chronic stroke patients: A randomised controlled trial. Aust Occup Ther J. 2019; 66(5):637-647. DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12602. View

Takahashi K, Domen K, Sakamoto T, Toshima M, Otaka Y, Seto M . Efficacy of Upper Extremity Robotic Therapy in Subacute Poststroke Hemiplegia: An Exploratory Randomized Trial. Stroke. 2016; 47(5):1385-8. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012520. View

Daunoraviciene K, Adomaviciene A, Grigonyte A, Griskevicius J, Juocevicius A . Effects of robot-assisted training on upper limb functional recovery during the rehabilitation of poststroke patients. Technol Health Care. 2018; 26(S2):533-542. DOI: 10.3233/THC-182500. View

Mazzoleni S, Tran V, Dario P, Posteraro F . Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Combined With Wrist Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019; 27(7):1458-1466. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2920576. View

Dehem S, Gilliaux M, Stoquart G, Detrembleur C, Jacquemin G, Palumbo S . Effectiveness of upper-limb robotic-assisted therapy in the early rehabilitation phase after stroke: A single-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019; 62(5):313-320. DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2019.04.002. View

Edwards D, Cortes M, Rykman-Peltz A, Chang J, Elder J, Thickbroom G . Clinical improvement with intensive robot-assisted arm training in chronic stroke is unchanged by supplementary tDCS. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2019; 37(2):167-180. DOI: 10.3233/RNN-180869. View

Lee K, Kim S, Lee J, Lee S, Yoo S . Effect of Upper Extremity Robot-Assisted Exercise on Spasticity in Stroke Patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2017; 40(6):961-971. PMC: 5256323. DOI: 10.5535/arm.2016.40.6.961. View

Taveggia G, Borboni A, Salvi L, Mule C, Fogliaresi S, Villafane J . Efficacy of robot-assisted rehabilitation for the functional recovery of the upper limb in post-stroke patients: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016; 52(6):767-773. View

10.

McCabe J, Monkiewicz M, Holcomb J, Pundik S, Daly J . Comparison of robotics, functional electrical stimulation, and motor learning methods for treatment of persistent upper extremity dysfunction after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 96(6):981-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.022. View

11.

Aisen M, Krebs H, Hogan N, McDowell F, Volpe B . The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch Neurol. 1997; 54(4):443-6. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1997.00550160075019. View

12.

Hesse S, Hess A, Werner C C, Kabbert N, Buschfort R . Effect on arm function and cost of robot-assisted group therapy in subacute patients with stroke and a moderately to severely affected arm: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2014; 28(7):637-47. DOI: 10.1177/0269215513516967. View

13.

Lum P, Burgar C, Shor P, Majmundar M, Van der Loos M . Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83(7):952-9. DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2001.33101. View

14.

Lamb F, Anderson J, Saling M, Dewey H . Predictors of subjective cognitive complaint in postacute older adult stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; 94(9):1747-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.02.026. View

15.

Hung C, Hsieh Y, Wu C, Lin K, Lin J, Yeh L . Comparative Assessment of Two Robot-Assisted Therapies for the Upper Extremity in People With Chronic Stroke. Am J Occup Ther. 2019; 73(1):7301205010p1-7301205010p9. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2019.022368. View

16.

Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P . "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12(3):189-98. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. View

17.

Villafane J, Taveggia G, Galeri S, Bissolotti L, Mulle C, Imperio G . Efficacy of Short-Term Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation in Patients With Hand Paralysis After Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Hand (N Y). 2017; 13(1):95-102. PMC: 5755871. DOI: 10.1177/1558944717692096. View

18.

Straudi S, Baroni A, Mele S, Craighero L, Manfredini F, Lamberti N . Effects of a Robot-Assisted Arm Training Plus Hand Functional Electrical Stimulation on Recovery After Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 101(2):309-316. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.09.016. View

19.

Ang K, Guan C, Phua K, Wang C, Zhou L, Tang K . Brain-computer interface-based robotic end effector system for wrist and hand rehabilitation: results of a three-armed randomized controlled trial for chronic stroke. Front Neuroeng. 2014; 7:30. PMC: 4114185. DOI: 10.3389/fneng.2014.00030. View

20.

Carpinella I, Lencioni T, Bowman T, Bertoni R, Turolla A, Ferrarin M . Effects of robot therapy on upper body kinematics and arm function in persons post stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020; 17(1):10. PMC: 6990497. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-020-0646-1. View