Effect of Bioglass on Growth and Biomineralization of SaOS-2 Cells in Hydrogel After 3D Cell Bioprinting
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
We investigated the effect of bioglass (bioactive glass) on growth and mineralization of bone-related SaOS-2 cells, encapsulated into a printable and biodegradable alginate/gelatine hydrogel. The hydrogel was supplemented either with polyphosphate (polyP), administered as polyP • Ca2+-complex, or silica, or as biosilica that had been enzymatically prepared from ortho-silicate by silicatein. These hydrogels, together with SaOS-2 cells, were bioprinted to computer-designed scaffolds. The results revealed that bioglass (nano)particles, with a size of 55 nm and a molar ratio of SiO2 : CaO : P2O5 of 55 : 40 : 5, did not affect the growth of the encapsulated cells. If silica, biosilica, or polyP • Ca2+-complex is co-added to the cell-containing alginate/gelatin hydrogel the growth behavior of the cells is not changed. Addition of 5 mg/ml of bioglass particles to this hydrogel significantly enhanced the potency of the entrapped SaOS-2 cells to mineralize. If compared with the extent of the cells to form mineral deposits in the absence of bioglass, the cells exposed to bioglass together with 100 µmoles/L polyP • Ca2+-complex increased their mineralization activity from 2.1- to 3.9-fold, or with 50 µmoles/L silica from 1.8- to 2.9-fold, or with 50 µmoles/L biosilica from 2.7- to 4.8-fold or with the two components together (100 µmoles/L polyP • Ca2+-complex and 50 µmoles/L biosilica) from 4.1- to 6.8-fold. Element analysis by EDX spectrometry of the mineral nodules formed by SaOS-2 revealed an accumulation of O, P, Ca and C, indicating that the mineral deposits contain, besides Ca-phosphate also Ca-carbonate. The results show that bioglass added to alginate/gelatin hydrogel increases the proliferation and mineralization of bioprinted SaOS-2 cells. We conclude that the development of cell-containing scaffolds consisting of a bioprintable, solid and cell-compatible inner matrix surrounded by a printable hard and flexible outer matrix containing bioglass, provide a suitable strategy for the fabrication of morphogenetically active and biodegradable implants.
Rodrigues J, Sarmento B, Leite Pereira C In Vitro Model. 2025; 1(1):5-27.
PMID: 39872973 PMC: 11756501. DOI: 10.1007/s44164-022-00008-x.
Khiari Z Mar Drugs. 2024; 22(3).
PMID: 38535475 PMC: 10971850. DOI: 10.3390/md22030134.
Enhanced Biomimetics of Three-Dimensional Osteosarcoma Models: A Scoping Review.
Sandhu V, Bakkalci D, Wei S, Cheema U Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(1).
PMID: 38201591 PMC: 10778420. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010164.
Julson J, Horton S, Quinn C, Beierle A, Bownes L, Stewart J J Pediatr Surg. 2023; 59(3):473-482.
PMID: 37919169 PMC: 10922146. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.10.004.
3D Bioprinting of Hyaline Articular Cartilage: Biopolymers, Hydrogels, and Bioinks.
Volova L, Kotelnikov G, Shishkovsky I, Volov D, Ossina N, Ryabov N Polymers (Basel). 2023; 15(12).
PMID: 37376340 PMC: 10301829. DOI: 10.3390/polym15122695.