» Articles » PMID: 25380748

Success Rates with Nicotine Personal Vaporizers: a Prospective 6-month Pilot Study of Smokers Not Intending to Quit

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2014 Nov 9
PMID 25380748
Citations 54
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Electronic cigarettes (e-Cigs) are an attractive long-term alternative nicotine source to conventional cigarettes. Although they may assist smokers to remain abstinent during their quit attempt, studies using first generation e-Cigs report low success rates. Second generation devices (personal vaporisers - PVs) may result in much higher quit rates, but their efficacy and safety in smoking cessation and/or reduction in clinical trials is unreported.

Method: We conducted a prospective proof-of-concept study monitoring modifications in smoking behaviour of 50 smokers (unwilling to quit) switched onto PVs. Participants attended five study visits: baseline, week-4, week-8, week-12 and week-24. Number of cigarettes/day (cigs/day) and exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO) levels were noted at each visit. Smoking reduction/abstinence rates, product usage, adverse events and subjective opinions of these products were also reviewed.

Results: Sustained 50% and 80% reduction in cigs/day at week-24 was reported in 15/50 (30%) and 7/50 (14%) participants with a reduction from 25cigs/day to 6cigs/day (p < 0.001) and 3cigs/day (p < 0.001), respectively. Smoking abstinence (self-reported abstinence from cigarette smoking verified by an eCO ≤10 ppm) at week-24 was observed in 18/50 (36%) participants, with 15/18 (83.3%) still using their PVs at the end of the study. Combined 50% reduction and smoking abstinence was shown in 33/50 (66%) participants. Throat/mouth irritation (35.6%), dry throat/mouth (28.9%), headache (26.7%) and dry cough (22.2%) were frequently reported early in the study, but waned substantially by week-24. Participants' perception and acceptance of the products was very good.

Conclusion: The use of second generation PVs substantially decreased cigarette consumption without causing significant adverse effects in smokers not intending to quit.

Trial Registration: (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02124200).

Citing Articles

Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.

Lindson N, Butler A, McRobbie H, Bullen C, Hajek P, Wu A Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025; 1:CD010216.

PMID: 39878158 PMC: 11776059. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub9.


The potential of new nicotine and tobacco products as tools for people who smoke to quit combustible cigarettes - a systematic review of common practices and guidance towards a robust study protocol to measure cessation efficacy.

Pluym N, Burkhardt T, Scherer G, Scherer M Harm Reduct J. 2024; 21(1):130.

PMID: 38970058 PMC: 11225172. DOI: 10.1186/s12954-024-01047-1.


Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.

Lindson N, Butler A, McRobbie H, Bullen C, Hajek P, Begh R Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 1:CD010216.

PMID: 38189560 PMC: 10772980. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub8.


E-cigarette use and respiratory symptoms in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Alqahtani M, Alenezi F, Almeshari M, Alanazi A, Ben Taleb Z, Kalan M Tob Induc Dis. 2023; 21:168.

PMID: 38098748 PMC: 10720266. DOI: 10.18332/tid/174660.


A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of combustion-free nicotine alternatives on cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic parameters in individuals with type 2 diabetes who smoke: the DiaSmokeFree study....

Krysinski A, Russo C, Campagna D, Di Pino A, John S, Belsey J Intern Emerg Med. 2023; 19(2):321-332.

PMID: 37999870 PMC: 10954907. DOI: 10.1007/s11739-023-03467-6.


References
1.
Farsalinos K, Romagna G, Tsiapras D, Kyrzopoulos S, Spyrou A, Voudris V . Impact of flavour variability on electronic cigarette use experience: an internet survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013; 10(12):7272-82. PMC: 3881166. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph10127272. View

2.
Wieslander G, Norback D, Lindgren T . Experimental exposure to propylene glycol mist in aviation emergency training: acute ocular and respiratory effects. Occup Environ Med. 2001; 58(10):649-55. PMC: 1740047. DOI: 10.1136/oem.58.10.649. View

3.
Smith S, McCarthy D, Japuntich S, Christiansen B, Piper M, Jorenby D . Comparative effectiveness of 5 smoking cessation pharmacotherapies in primary care clinics. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169(22):2148-55. PMC: 2891174. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.426. View

4.
Bullen C, McRobbie H, Thornley S, Glover M, Lin R, Laugesen M . Effect of an electronic nicotine delivery device (e cigarette) on desire to smoke and withdrawal, user preferences and nicotine delivery: randomised cross-over trial. Tob Control. 2010; 19(2):98-103. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2009.031567. View

5.
Farsalinos K, Polosa R . Safety evaluation and risk assessment of electronic cigarettes as tobacco cigarette substitutes: a systematic review. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2014; 5(2):67-86. PMC: 4110871. DOI: 10.1177/2042098614524430. View