» Articles » PMID: 25367913

Systematic Review of Biomarkers to Monitor Therapeutic Response in Leishmaniasis

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2014 Nov 5
PMID 25367913
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recently, there has been a renewed interest in the development of new drugs for the treatment of leishmaniasis. This has spurred the need for pharmacodynamic markers to monitor and compare therapies specifically for visceral leishmaniasis, in which the primary recrudescence of parasites is a particularly long-term event that remains difficult to predict. We performed a systematic review of studies evaluating biomarkers in human patients with visceral, cutaneous, and post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis, which yielded a total of 170 studies in which 53 potential pharmacodynamic biomarkers were identified. In conclusion, the large majority of these biomarkers constituted universal indirect markers of activation and subsequent waning of cellular immunity and therefore lacked specificity. Macrophage-related markers demonstrate favorable sensitivity and times to normalcy, but more evidence is required to establish a link between these markers and clinical outcome. Most promising are the markers directly related to the parasite burden, but future effort should be focused on optimization of molecular or antigenic targets to increase the sensitivity of these markers. In general, future research should focus on the longitudinal evaluation of the pharmacodynamic biomarkers during treatment, with an emphasis on the correlation of studied biomarkers and clinical parameters.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Chemokines MIG and IP-10 as Immunological Biomarkers of Human Visceral Leishmaniasis: A Systematic Review.

Monteiro B, da Silva E, Junior W, Vieira A, Souza R, Paiva M Trop Med Infect Dis. 2024; 9(9).

PMID: 39330908 PMC: 11435945. DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed9090219.


Cytokine profiles, blood parasite load and clinical features of visceral leishmaniasis in West Pokot County, Kenya.

van Dijk N, Carter J, Kiptanui D, Pinelli E, Schallig H Parasitology. 2024; 151(7):753-761.

PMID: 39311405 PMC: 11474019. DOI: 10.1017/S0031182024000751.


Innate biosignature of treatment failure in human cutaneous leishmaniasis.

Gomez M, Belew A, Vargas D, Giraldo-Parra L, Rebellon-Sanchez D, Alexander T Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 38746226 PMC: 11092798. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4271873/v1.


Simplified molecular diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis: Laboratory evaluation of miniature direct-on-blood PCR nucleic acid lateral flow immunoassay.

van Dijk N, Hagos D, Huggins D, Carrillo E, Ajala S, Chicharro C PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024; 18(5):e0011637.

PMID: 38713648 PMC: 11075898. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011637.


Leishmania blood parasite dynamics during and after treatment of visceral leishmaniasis in Eastern Africa: A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model.

Verrest L, Monnerat S, Musa A, Mbui J, Khalil E, Olobo J PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024; 18(4):e0012078.

PMID: 38640118 PMC: 11062534. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012078.


References
1.
Vitale G, Mocciaro C, Malta R, Gambino G, Spinelli A, Giordano C . Evaluation of serum levels of soluble CD4, CD8 and beta 2-microglobulin in visceral human leishmaniasis. Clin Exp Immunol. 1994; 97(2):280-3. PMC: 1534687. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1994.tb06081.x. View

2.
Riera C, Fisa R, Lopez P, Ribera E, Carrio J, Falco V . Evaluation of a latex agglutination test (KAtex) for detection of Leishmania antigen in urine of patients with HIV-Leishmania coinfection: value in diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004; 23(12):899-904. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-004-1249-7. View

3.
Latifynia A, Khamesipour A, Bokaie S, Khansari N . Antioxidants and proinflamatory cytokines in the sera of patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis. Iran J Immunol. 2012; 9(3):208-14. DOI: IJIv9i3A8. View

4.
Murray H, Berman J, Davies C, Saravia N . Advances in leishmaniasis. Lancet. 2005; 366(9496):1561-77. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67629-5. View

5.
. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001; 69(3):89-95. DOI: 10.1067/mcp.2001.113989. View