» Articles » PMID: 25359316

Changes in SAM2 Expression Affect Lactic Acid Tolerance and Lactic Acid Production in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2014 Nov 1
PMID 25359316
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The great interest in the production of highly pure lactic acid enantiomers comes from the application of polylactic acid (PLA) for the production of biodegradable plastics. Yeasts can be considered as alternative cell factories to lactic acid bacteria for lactic acid production, despite not being natural producers, since they can better tolerate acidic environments. We have previously described metabolically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains producing high amounts of L-lactic acid (>60 g/L) at low pH. The high product concentration represents the major limiting step of the process, mainly because of its toxic effects. Therefore, our goal was the identification of novel targets for strain improvement possibly involved in the yeast response to lactic acid stress.

Results: The enzyme S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) synthetase catalyses the only known reaction leading to the biosynthesis of SAM, an important cellular cofactor. SAM is involved in phospholipid biosynthesis and hence in membrane remodelling during acid stress. Since only the enzyme isoform 2 seems to be responsive to membrane related signals (e.g. myo-inositol), Sam2p was tagged with GFP to analyse its abundance and cellular localization under different stress conditions. Western blot analyses showed that lactic acid exposure correlates with an increase in protein levels. The SAM2 gene was then overexpressed and deleted in laboratory strains. Remarkably, in the BY4741 strain its deletion conferred higher resistance to lactic acid, while its overexpression was detrimental. Therefore, SAM2 was deleted in a strain previously engineered and evolved for industrial lactic acid production and tolerance, resulting in higher production.

Conclusions: Here we demonstrated that the modulation of SAM2 can have different outcomes, from clear effects to no significant phenotypic responses, upon lactic acid stress in different genetic backgrounds, and that at least in one genetic background SAM2 deletion led to an industrially relevant increase in lactic acid production. Further work is needed to elucidate the molecular basis of these observations, which underline once more that strain robustness relies on complex cellular mechanisms, involving regulatory genes and proteins. Our data confirm cofactor engineering as an important tool for cell factory improvement.

Citing Articles

Just around the Corner: Advances in the Optimization of Yeasts and Filamentous Fungi for Lactic Acid Production.

Melo N, de Oliveira Junqueira A, Lima L, Sampaio de Oliveira K, Dos Reis M, Franco O J Fungi (Basel). 2024; 10(3).

PMID: 38535215 PMC: 10971269. DOI: 10.3390/jof10030207.


Increased CO fixation enables high carbon-yield production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid in yeast.

Qin N, Li L, Wan X, Ji X, Chen Y, Li C Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):1591.

PMID: 38383540 PMC: 10881976. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45557-9.


General mechanisms of weak acid-tolerance and current strategies for the development of tolerant yeasts.

Li M, Chu Y, Dong X, Ji H World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2023; 40(2):49.

PMID: 38133718 DOI: 10.1007/s11274-023-03875-y.


Methionine addition improves the acid tolerance of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum by altering cellular metabolic flux, energy distribution, lipids composition.

Meng Q, Li Y, Yuan Y, Wu S, Shi K, Liu S Stress Biol. 2023; 2(1):48.

PMID: 37676340 PMC: 10441991. DOI: 10.1007/s44154-022-00072-z.


Metabolic Engineering and Adaptive Evolution for Efficient Production of l-Lactic Acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Zhu P, Luo R, Li Y, Chen X Microbiol Spectr. 2022; 10(6):e0227722.

PMID: 36354322 PMC: 9769770. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.02277-22.


References
1.
Dequin S, Barre P . Mixed lactic acid-alcoholic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing the Lactobacillus casei L(+)-LDH. Biotechnology (N Y). 1994; 12(2):173-7. DOI: 10.1038/nbt0294-173. View

2.
Scheer M, Grote A, Chang A, Schomburg I, Munaretto C, Rother M . BRENDA, the enzyme information system in 2011. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 39(Database issue):D670-6. PMC: 3013686. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq1089. View

3.
Reynolds S, Kall L, Riffle M, Bilmes J, Noble W . Transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction using dynamic bayesian networks. PLoS Comput Biol. 2008; 4(11):e1000213. PMC: 2570248. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000213. View

4.
Ishida N, Saitoh S, Tokuhiro K, Nagamori E, Matsuyama T, Kitamoto K . Efficient production of L-Lactic acid by metabolically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae with a genome-integrated L-lactate dehydrogenase gene. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005; 71(4):1964-70. PMC: 1082537. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.4.1964-1970.2005. View

5.
Pronk J . Auxotrophic yeast strains in fundamental and applied research. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002; 68(5):2095-100. PMC: 127579. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.5.2095-2100.2002. View