» Articles » PMID: 25356094

Biomechanical Evaluation with Finite Element Analysis of the Reconstruction of Femoral Tumor Defects by Using a Double-barrel Free Vascularized Fibular Graft Combined with a Locking Plate

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2014 Oct 31
PMID 25356094
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The repair of large distal femoral tumor defects can be challenging for orthopedic surgeons. The combination of a double-barrel free vascularized fibular graft (DFVFG) with a locking plate is a viable option. However, the biomechanical influence of the fibular bone length on the locking plate attachment is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the stability of the distal femoral defect after reconstruction with fibular grafts of different lengths. A three-dimensional model of a healthy volunteer was developed using computed tomography images. A locking plate and bicortical screws were constructed and registered with CAD. Four models were defined (6 cm, 8 cm, 10 cm, and 12 cm bone grafts). The models were imported into finite element analysis software. Boundary-constrained and load conditions were applied. The model stress distribution and displacement were statistically analyzed. The Von Mises stress distributions were similar between the 6 cm, 8 cm, and 10 cm bone grafts and locking plate within each of those bone defect models (P > 0.05), while the Von Mises stress distribution was significantly higher in the 12 cm model than the other 3 lengths for both the bone graft and locking plate (P < 0.05). Significantly greater Von Mises stress was observed at the 12 cm bone graft and locking plate than with the shorter bone grafts. Therefore, we recommend that, to avoid complications, the bone graft should not exceed 12 cm when using FVFG in combination with a locking plate while treating a distal femoral tumor defect.

Citing Articles

The significance of reduction of valgus-intercalated femoral neck fracture with valgus angle > 15°and the selection of internal fixation by finite element analysis.

Yusufu A, Yusupu T, Haibier A, Abulaiti A, Ran J BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):79.

PMID: 38245700 PMC: 10799410. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07180-z.


Biomechanics of PHILOS plates in Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture.

Yun C, Qian W, Zhang J, Zhang W, Lv J Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1282128.

PMID: 38047287 PMC: 10690819. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1282128.


Nonvascularized fibular graft with locking screw fixation for metaphyseal bone loss of distal femur: biomechanical assessment validated by a clinical case series.

Jitprapaikulsarn S, Chantarapanich N, Gromprasit A, Mahaisavariya C, Sukha K, Rungsakaolert P Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023; 34(1):659-671.

PMID: 37684357 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-023-03710-y.


Do stress fractures induce hypertrophy of the grafted fibula? A report of three cases received free vascularized fibular graft treatment for tibial defects.

Qi Y, Sun H, Fan Y, Li F, Lin Z Chin J Traumatol. 2016; 19(3):179-81.

PMID: 27321302 PMC: 4908233. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.04.003.

References
1.
Friedrich J, Moran S, Bishop A, Wood C, Shin A . Free vascularized fibular graft salvage of complications of long-bone allograft after tumor reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(1):93-100. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00551. View

2.
Chen S, Chiang M, Hung C, Lin S, Chang H . Finite element comparison of retrograde intramedullary nailing and locking plate fixation with/without an intramedullary allograft for distal femur fracture following total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2013; 21(1):224-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2013.03.006. View

3.
Jia W, Zhang C, Sheng J, Jin D, Cheng X, Chen S . Free vascularized fibular grafting in combination with a locking plate for the reconstruction of a large tibial defect secondary to osteomyelitis in a child: a case report and literature review. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2009; 19(1):66-70. DOI: 10.1097/BPB.0b013e328331c340. View

4.
Muscolo D, Ayerza M, Aponte-Tinao L, Ranalletta M, Abalo E . Intercalary femur and tibia segmental allografts provide an acceptable alternative in reconstructing tumor resections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (426):97-102. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000141652.93178.10. View

5.
Krishna B, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A . Low stiffness porous Ti structures for load-bearing implants. Acta Biomater. 2007; 3(6):997-1006. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.03.008. View