» Articles » PMID: 25350897

Severity of Psychological Distress Among Adults with and Without Disabilities

Overview
Publisher Routledge
Specialty Public Health
Date 2014 Oct 29
PMID 25350897
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine psychological distress and its individual symptoms between adults with and without disabilities, and among adults with disabilities, to examine whether an association exists between severity of distress and health-related factors. Cross-sectional data from the 2007 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were used for this study. Severity of psychological distress was assessed using the Kessler 6 scale of nonspecific psychological distress. Logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate predicted marginals and prevalence ratios. Nine percent of adults had mild to moderate psychological distress and 3.9% had serious psychological distress. The adjusted mean Kessler 6 total scores and individual item scores were higher for adults with disabilities, as was the average number of days that a mental health condition interfered with activities in the past 30 days. Among adults with disabilities, mild to moderate and serious psychological distress were particularly high among those who were unemployed or unable to work. Those who had either mild to moderate or serious psychological distress were significantly more likely than those with no psychological distress to be physically inactive, to smoke, and to report fair or poor health, life dissatisfaction, and inadequate social support. A dose-response relationship exists between categorical severity of psychological distress and examined health-related factors. These findings may inform the design of targeted public health strategies that aim to eliminate health disparities between people with and without disabilities.

Citing Articles

Health inequities among persons with disabilities: a global scoping review.

Umucu E, Vernon A, Pan D, Qin S, Solis G, Campa R Front Public Health. 2025; 13:1538519.

PMID: 39995629 PMC: 11849497. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1538519.


Built Environment Accessibility and Disability as Predictors of Well-Being among Older Adults: A Norwegian Cross-Sectional Study.

Forster G, Aaro L, Alme M, Hansen T, Nilsen T, Vedaa O Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(10).

PMID: 37239625 PMC: 10218673. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20105898.


Raising employment and quality of life among people with disadvantages - results of a Hungarian project.

Kuklek N, Cseplo M, Pozsonyi E, Pusztafalvi H BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1):1729.

PMID: 34556054 PMC: 8461927. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11763-z.


Self-Reported Vision Impairment and Psychological Distress in U.S. Adults.

Lundeen E, Saydah S, Ehrlich J, Saaddine J Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2021; 29(2):171-181.

PMID: 33896341 PMC: 10949979. DOI: 10.1080/09286586.2021.1918177.

References
1.
Reichard A, Stolzle H, Fox M . Health disparities among adults with physical disabilities or cognitive limitations compared to individuals with no disabilities in the United States. Disabil Health J. 2011; 4(2):59-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2010.05.003. View

2.
Gariepy G, Wang J, Lesage A, Schmitz N . Obesity and the risk of disability in a 12-year cohort study: the role of psychological distress. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2010; 46(11):1173-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-010-0284-1. View

3.
Blumberg S, Luke J, Davidson G, Davern M, Yu T, Soderberg K . Wireless substitution: state-level estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, January-December 2007. Natl Health Stat Report. 2009; (14):1-13, 16. View

4.
Rai D, Kosidou K, Lundberg M, Araya R, Lewis G, Magnusson C . Psychological distress and risk of long-term disability: population-based longitudinal study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011; 66(7):586-92. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2010.119644. View

5.
Thota A, Sipe T, Byard G, Zometa C, Hahn R, McKnight-Eily L . Collaborative care to improve the management of depressive disorders: a community guide systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42(5):525-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.01.019. View