» Articles » PMID: 20848077

Obesity and the Risk of Disability in a 12-year Cohort Study: the Role of Psychological Distress

Overview
Date 2010 Sep 18
PMID 20848077
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Recent cross-sectional findings suggest that co-occurring obesity and psychological problems amplify the risk of disability, but longitudinal evidence is lacking. We assessed this effect in a longitudinal cohort of adults.

Methods: Twelve years of data (1994/1995-2006/2007) were obtained from the Canadian National Population Health Survey. This study followed 8,062 adults that were interviewed every 2 years. Disability status was derived from the Health Utility Index Mark 3. Covariates of interest were repeated psychological distress (Kessler K6 scale) and obesity (body mass index ≥30). Incidence of disability was estimated from Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for sociodemographic and health variables. Hazard rate of disability in those with either obesity (n = 955) or distress (n = 1,044), or both (n = 138) were compared to those without (n = 5,925).

Results: Participants with both obesity and repeated distress had double the risk of disability compared to those with obesity or distress alone {adjusted hazard ratio of 2.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8, 4.5] compared to 1.4 (CI 1.1, 1.8) and 1.8 (CI 1.4, 2.3), respectively}.

Conclusions: Recurrent psychological distress combined with obesity amplified the risk for disability normally associated with these conditions.

Citing Articles

Helping providers address psychological aspects of obesity in routine care: Development of the obesity adjustment dialogue tool (OADT).

Vallis M Obes Pillars. 2023; 8:100088.

PMID: 38125657 PMC: 10728697. DOI: 10.1016/j.obpill.2023.100088.


Obesity in Adults: Position Statement of Polish Association for the Study on Obesity, Polish Association of Endocrinology, Polish Association of Cardiodiabetology, Polish Psychiatric Association, Section of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery of the....

Olszanecka-Glinianowicz M, Mazur A, Chudek J, Kos-Kudla B, Markuszewski L, Dudek D Nutrients. 2023; 15(7).

PMID: 37049479 PMC: 10097178. DOI: 10.3390/nu15071641.


The Relationship between Stress and Severe Obesity: A Case-Control Study.

Koski M, Naukkarinen H Biomed Hub. 2020; 2(1):1-13.

PMID: 31988895 PMC: 6945898. DOI: 10.1159/000458771.


Re-thinking the Etiological Framework of Neurodegeneration.

Castillo X, Castro-Obregon S, Gutierrez-Becker B, Gutierrez-Ospina G, Karalis N, Khalil A Front Neurosci. 2019; 13:728.

PMID: 31396030 PMC: 6667555. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00728.


Performance on the Functional Movement Screen in older active adults.

Mitchell U, Wayne Johnson A, Vehrs P, Feland J, Hilton S J Sport Health Sci. 2018; 5(1):119-125.

PMID: 30356515 PMC: 6188618. DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2015.04.006.


References
1.
Giles L, Metcalf P, Glonek G, Luszcz M, Andrews G . The effects of social networks on disability in older Australians. J Aging Health. 2004; 16(4):517-38. DOI: 10.1177/0898264304265778. View

2.
Edwards R, Bingham 3rd C, Bathon J, Haythornthwaite J . Catastrophizing and pain in arthritis, fibromyalgia, and other rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Rheum. 2006; 55(2):325-32. DOI: 10.1002/art.21865. View

3.
Jans M, van den Heuvel S, Hildebrandt V, Bongers P . Overweight and obesity as predictors of absenteeism in the working population of the Netherlands. J Occup Environ Med. 2007; 49(9):975-80. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31814b2eb7. View

4.
OSullivan J . Body weight and subsequent diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 1982; 248(8):949-52. View

5.
Connor Gorber S, Tremblay M, Moher D, Gorber B . A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2007; 8(4):307-26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00347.x. View