» Articles » PMID: 25347989

Validity and Usability of Low-cost Accelerometers for Internet-based Self-monitoring of Physical Activity in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2014 Oct 29
PMID 25347989
Citations 63
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The importance of regular physical activity for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is well-established. However, many patients do not meet the recommended daily amount. Accelerometers might provide patients with the information needed to increase physical activity in daily life.

Objective: Our objective was to assess the validity and usability of low-cost Internet-connected accelerometers. Furthermore we explored patients' preferences with regards to the presentation of and feedback on monitored physical activity.

Methods: To assess concurrent validity we conducted a field validation study with patients who wore two low-cost accelerometers, Fitbit and Physical Activity Monitor (PAM), at the same time along with a sophisticated multisensor accelerometer (SenseWear Armband) for 48 hours. Data on energy expenditure assessed from registrations from the two low-cost accelerometers were compared to the well validated SenseWear Armband which served as a reference criterion. Usability was examined in a cross-over study with patients who, in succession, wore the Fitbit and the PAM for 7 consecutive days and filled out a 16 item questionnaire with regards to the use of the corresponding device

Results: The agreement between energy expenditure (METs) from the SenseWear Armband with METs estimated by the Fitbit and PAM was good (r=.77) and moderate (r=.41), respectively. The regression model that was developed for the Fitbit explained 92% whereas the PAM-model could explain 89% of total variance in METs measured by the SenseWear. With regards to the usability, both the Fitbit and PAM were well rated on all items. There were no significant differences between the two devices.

Conclusions: The low-cost Fitbit and PAM are valid and usable devices to measure physical activity in patients with COPD. These devices may be useful in long-term interventions aiming at increasing physical activity levels in these patients.

Citing Articles

Using a Consumer Wearable Activity Monitoring Device to Study Physical Activity and Sleep Among Adolescents in Project Viva: Cohort Study.

Zhang Y, Bornkamp N, Hivert M, Oken E, James P JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2025; 8:e59159.

PMID: 39903900 PMC: 11813160. DOI: 10.2196/59159.


The Role of Wearable Devices in Chronic Disease Monitoring and Patient Care: A Comprehensive Review.

Jafleh E, Alnaqbi F, Almaeeni H, Faqeeh S, Alzaabi M, Al Zaman K Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e68921.

PMID: 39381470 PMC: 11461032. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.68921.


Accuracy of consumer-based activity trackers to measure and coach patients with lower limb lymphoedema.

Blondeel A, Devoogdt N, Asnong A, Geraerts I, De Groef A, Heroes A PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0305768.

PMID: 39024359 PMC: 11257309. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305768.


Physical activity following pulmonary embolism and clinical correlates in selected patients: a cross-sectional study.

Haukeland-Parker S, Jervan O, Ghanima W, Spruit M, Holst R, Tavoly M Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024; 8(2):102366.

PMID: 38562511 PMC: 10982567. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102366.


Investigating the prognostic value of digital mobility outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Buttery S, Williams P, Alghamdi S, Philip K, Perkins A, Kallis C Eur Respir Rev. 2023; 32(170).

PMID: 37993126 PMC: 10663939. DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0134-2023.


References
1.
Watz H, Waschki B, Meyer T, Magnussen H . Physical activity in patients with COPD. Eur Respir J. 2008; 33(2):262-72. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00024608. View

2.
Mador M, Patel A, Nadler J . Effects of pulmonary rehabilitation on activity levels in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2010; 31(1):52-9. DOI: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181ebf2ef. View

3.
Pitta F, Troosters T, Spruit M, Probst V, Decramer M, Gosselink R . Characteristics of physical activities in daily life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005; 171(9):972-7. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200407-855OC. View

4.
Spruit M, Singh S, Garvey C, ZuWallack R, Nici L, Rochester C . An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013; 188(8):e13-64. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201309-1634ST. View

5.
Garber C, Blissmer B, Deschenes M, Franklin B, LaMonte M, Lee I . American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011; 43(7):1334-59. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb. View