Feasibility and Effectiveness of Drop-off Spots to Promote Walking to School

Overview

Journal Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties Nutritional Sciences
Orthopedics
Social Sciences

Date 2014 Oct 28

PMID 25346220

Citations 10

Authors

Griet Vanwolleghem

Sara DHaese

Delfien Van Dyck

Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij

Greet Cardon

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Drop-off spots are locations in the proximity of primary schools where parents can drop off or pick up their child. From these drop-off spots children can walk to and from school. This pilot study aimed to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of drop-off spots and to evaluate how drop-off spots are perceived by school principals, teachers and parents of 6-to-12-year old children.

Methods: First, a feasibility questionnaire was completed (n = 216) to obtain parental opinions towards the implementation of drop-off spots. A drop-off spot was organized (500-800 m distance from school) in two primary schools. A within-subject design was used to compare children's (n = 58) step counts and number of walking trips during usual conditions (baseline) and during implementation of a drop-off spot (intervention). Three-level (class-participant-condition) linear regression models were used to determine intervention effects. After the intervention, 2 school principals, 7 teachers and 44 parents filled out a process evaluation questionnaire.

Results: Prior to the intervention, 96% expressed the need for adult supervision during the route to school. Positive significant intervention effects were found for step counts before/after school hours (+732 step counts/day; X2 = 12.2; p < 0.001) and number of walking trips to/from school (+2 trips/week; X2 = 52.9; p < 0.001). No intervention effect was found for total step counts/day (X2 = 2.0; p = 0.16). The intervention was positively perceived by the school principals and parents, but teachers expressed doubts regarding future implementation.

Conclusion: This pilot study showed that implementing drop-off spots might be an effective intervention to promote children's walking to school. Implementing drop-off spots does not require major efforts from the schools and schools can choose how and when they organize drop-off spots. However, motivating teachers and involving other volunteers (e.g. parents, grandparents) may be needed. Future studies should investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of drop-off spots in a larger sample of schools.

Citing Articles

Promoting children's health through community-led street interventions: analyzing sustained voluntarism in Canadian School Streets.

Thompson C, Collins P, Frohlich K BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1011.

PMID: 38605365 PMC: 11010341. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18531-9.

Convergent Validation of a Self-Reported Commuting to and from School Diary in Spanish Adolescents.

Galvez-Fernandez P, Herrador-Colmenero M, Campos-Garzon P, Molina-Soberanes D, Saucedo-Araujo R, Aranda-Balboa M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(1).

PMID: 36612339 PMC: 9819640. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20010018.

A Tale of Two Cities: Unpacking the Success and Failure of School Street Interventions in Two Canadian Cities.

Smith L, Gosselin V, Collins P, Frohlich K Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(18).

PMID: 36141827 PMC: 9517135. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811555.

Implementation of School Remote Drop-off Walking Programs: Results from Qualitative Interviews.

Bejarano C, Koester M, Steel C, Carlson J J Transp Health. 2021; 22.

PMID: 34336596 PMC: 8323835. DOI: 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101126.

Feasibility and Reliability of a Questionnaire to Assess the Mode, Frequency, Distance and Time of Commuting to and from School: The PACO Study.

Segura-Diaz J, Rojas-Jimenez A, Barranco-Ruiz Y, Murillo-Pardo B, Saucedo-Araujo R, Aranda-Balboa M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(14).

PMID: 32668796 PMC: 7399968. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17145039.

References

Heelan K, Abbey B, Donnelly J, Mayo M, Welk G . Evaluation of a walking school bus for promoting physical activity in youth. J Phys Act Health. 2009; 6(5):560-7. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.6.5.560. View

Mendoza J, Levinger D, Johnston B . Pilot evaluation of a walking school bus program in a low-income, urban community. BMC Public Health. 2009; 9:122. PMC: 2680829. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-122. View

Van Cauwenberghe E, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Maes L, Cardon G . Efficacy and feasibility of lowering playground density to promote physical activity and to discourage sedentary time during recess at preschool: a pilot study. Prev Med. 2012; 55(4):319-321. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.07.014. View

Merom D, Tudor-Locke C, Bauman A, Rissel C . Active commuting to school among NSW primary school children: implications for public health. Health Place. 2005; 12(4):678-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.09.003. View

van der Ploeg H, Merom D, Corpuz G, Bauman A . Trends in Australian children traveling to school 1971-2003: burning petrol or carbohydrates?. Prev Med. 2007; 46(1):60-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.06.002. View

DHaese S, Meester F, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Deforche B, Cardon G . Criterion distances and environmental correlates of active commuting to school in children. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011; 8:88. PMC: 3168397. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-88. View

Leech R, McNaughton S, Timperio A . The clustering of diet, physical activity and sedentary behavior in children and adolescents: a review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014; 11:4. PMC: 3904164. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-4. View

Davison K, Werder J, Lawson C . Children's active commuting to school: current knowledge and future directions. Prev Chronic Dis. 2008; 5(3):A100. PMC: 2483568. View

Chillon P, Evenson K, Vaughn A, Ward D . A systematic review of interventions for promoting active transportation to school. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011; 8:10. PMC: 3050785. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-10. View

10.

Boarnet M, Anderson C, Day K, McMillan T, Alfonzo M . Evaluation of the California Safe Routes to School legislation: urban form changes and children's active transportation to school. Am J Prev Med. 2005; 28(2 Suppl 2):134-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.026. View

11.

Southward E, Page A, Wheeler B, Cooper A . Contribution of the school journey to daily physical activity in children aged 11-12 years. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 43(2):201-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.015. View

12.

Bere E, Bjorkelund L . Test-retest reliability of a new self reported comprehensive questionnaire measuring frequencies of different modes of adolescents commuting to school and their parents commuting to work - the ATN questionnaire. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009; 6:68. PMC: 2768672. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-68. View

13.

Eyler A, Brownson R, Doescher M, Evenson K, Fesperman C, Litt J . Policies related to active transport to and from school: a multisite case study. Health Educ Res. 2007; 23(6):963-75. DOI: 10.1093/her/cym061. View

14.

Fremeaux A, Mallam K, Metcalf B, Hosking J, Voss L, Wilkin T . The impact of school-time activity on total physical activity: the activitystat hypothesis (EarlyBird 46). Int J Obes (Lond). 2011; 35(10):1277-83. DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2011.52. View

15.

Salmon J, Timperio A, Cleland V, Venn A . Trends in children's physical activity and weight status in high and low socio-economic status areas of Melbourne, Victoria, 1985-2001. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2005; 29(4):337-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2005.tb00204.x. View

16.

Cardon G, Maes L R, Haerens L, De Bourdeaudhuij I M . Bicycling to school during the transition from childhood into adolescence: a six-year longitudinal study. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2012; 24(3):369-83. DOI: 10.1123/pes.24.3.369. View

17.

Bassett Jr D, Pucher J, Buehler R, Thompson D, Crouter S . Walking, cycling, and obesity rates in Europe, North America, and Australia. J Phys Act Health. 2009; 5(6):795-814. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.5.6.795. View

18.

Panter J, Jones A, van Sluijs E . Environmental determinants of active travel in youth: a review and framework for future research. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008; 5:34. PMC: 2483993. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-34. View

19.

Kong A, Sussman A, Negrete S, Patterson N, Mittleman R, Hough R . Implementation of a walking school bus: lessons learned. J Sch Health. 2009; 79(7):319-25. DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00416.x. View

20.

Norton D, Sivarajan Froelicher E, Waters C, Carrieri-Kohlman V . Parental influence on models of primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in children. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2003; 2(4):311-22. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-5151(03)00072-0. View