» Articles » PMID: 25345855

Naïve-like Conversion Enhances the Difference in Innate in Vitro Differentiation Capacity Between Rabbit ES Cells and IPS Cells

Overview
Journal J Reprod Dev
Date 2014 Oct 28
PMID 25345855
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Quality evaluation of pluripotent stem cells using appropriate animal models needs to be improved for human regenerative medicine. Previously, we demonstrated that although the in vitro neural differentiating capacity of rabbit induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) can be mitigated by improving their baseline level of pluripotency, i.e., by converting them into the so-called "naïve-like" state, the effect after such conversion of rabbit embryonic stem cells (ESCs) remains to be elucidated. Here we found that naïve-like conversion enhanced the differences in innate in vitro differentiation capacity between ESCs and iPSCs. Naïve-like rabbit ESCs exhibited several features indicating pluripotency, including the capacity for teratoma formation. They differentiated into mature oligodendrocytes much more effectively (3.3-7.2 times) than naïve-like iPSCs. This suggests an inherent variation in differentiation potential in vitro among PSC lines. When naïve-like ESCs were injected into preimplantation rabbit embryos, although they contributed efficiently to forming the inner cell mass of blastocysts, no chimeric pups were obtained. Thus, in vitro neural differentiation following naïve-like conversion is a promising option for determining the quality of PSCs without the need to demonstrate chimeric contribution. These results provide an opportunity to evaluate which pluripotent stem cells or treatments are best suited for therapeutic use.

Citing Articles

Rabbit induced pluripotent stem cells retain capability of in vitro cardiac differentiation.

Phakdeedindan P, Setthawong P, Tiptanavattana N, Rungarunlert S, Ingrungruanglert P, Israsena N Exp Anim. 2018; 68(1):35-47.

PMID: 30089733 PMC: 6389514. DOI: 10.1538/expanim.18-0074.


Generation of genetically-engineered animals using engineered endonucleases.

Lee J, Sung Y, Baek I Arch Pharm Res. 2018; 41(9):885-897.

PMID: 29777358 PMC: 6153862. DOI: 10.1007/s12272-018-1037-z.


Rabbit models for biomedical research revisited via genome editing approaches.

Honda A, Ogura A J Reprod Dev. 2017; 63(5):435-438.

PMID: 28579598 PMC: 5649091. DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2017-053.


Capturing Human Naïve Pluripotency in the Embryo and in the Dish.

Zimmerlin L, Park T, Zambidis E Stem Cells Dev. 2017; 26(16):1141-1161.

PMID: 28537488 PMC: 5564037. DOI: 10.1089/scd.2017.0055.


Discrimination of Stem Cell Status after Subjecting Cynomolgus Monkey Pluripotent Stem Cells to Naïve Conversion.

Honda A, Kawano Y, Izu H, Choijookhuu N, Honsho K, Nakamura T Sci Rep. 2017; 7:45285.

PMID: 28349944 PMC: 5368663. DOI: 10.1038/srep45285.


References
1.
Honda A, Hirose M, Hatori M, Matoba S, Miyoshi H, Inoue K . Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells in rabbits: potential experimental models for human regenerative medicine. J Biol Chem. 2010; 285(41):31362-9. PMC: 2951210. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.150540. View

2.
Kim S, Kim G, Miyoshi H, Moon S, Ahn S, Lee J . Efficiency of the elongation factor-1alpha promoter in mammalian embryonic stem cells using lentiviral gene delivery systems. Stem Cells Dev. 2007; 16(4):537-45. DOI: 10.1089/scd.2006.0088. View

3.
Guenther M, Frampton G, Soldner F, Hockemeyer D, Mitalipova M, Jaenisch R . Chromatin structure and gene expression programs of human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2010; 7(2):249-57. PMC: 3010384. DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.06.015. View

4.
Tesar P, Chenoweth J, Brook F, Davies T, Evans E, Mack D . New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells. Nature. 2007; 448(7150):196-9. DOI: 10.1038/nature05972. View

5.
Takashima Y, Guo G, Loos R, Nichols J, Ficz G, Krueger F . Resetting transcription factor control circuitry toward ground-state pluripotency in human. Cell. 2014; 158(6):1254-1269. PMC: 4162745. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.029. View