» Articles » PMID: 25309306

Auditory Stream Segregation Using Bandpass Noises: Evidence from Event-related Potentials

Overview
Journal Front Neurosci
Date 2014 Oct 14
PMID 25309306
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The current study measured neural responses to investigate auditory stream segregation of noise stimuli with or without clear spectral contrast. Sequences of alternating A and B noise bursts were presented to elicit stream segregation in normal-hearing listeners. The successive B bursts in each sequence maintained an equal amount of temporal separation with manipulations introduced on the last stimulus. The last B burst was either delayed for 50% of the sequences or not delayed for the other 50%. The A bursts were jittered in between every two adjacent B bursts. To study the effects of spectral separation on streaming, the A and B bursts were further manipulated by using either bandpass-filtered noises widely spaced in center frequency or broadband noises. Event-related potentials (ERPs) to the last B bursts were analyzed to compare the neural responses to the delay vs. no-delay trials in both passive and attentive listening conditions. In the passive listening condition, a trend for a possible late mismatch negativity (MMN) or late discriminative negativity (LDN) response was observed only when the A and B bursts were spectrally separate, suggesting that spectral separation in the A and B burst sequences could be conducive to stream segregation at the pre-attentive level. In the attentive condition, a P300 response was consistently elicited regardless of whether there was spectral separation between the A and B bursts, indicating the facilitative role of voluntary attention in stream segregation. The results suggest that reliable ERP measures can be used as indirect indicators for auditory stream segregation in conditions of weak spectral contrast. These findings have important implications for cochlear implant (CI) studies-as spectral information available through a CI device or simulation is substantially degraded, it may require more attention to achieve stream segregation.

Citing Articles

The Relationship of Pitch Discrimination with Segregation of Tonal and Speech Streams for Cochlear Implant Users.

Camarena A, Ardis M, Fujioka T, Fitzgerald M, Goldsworthy R Trends Hear. 2024; 28:23312165241305049.

PMID: 39668613 PMC: 11639003. DOI: 10.1177/23312165241305049.


Auditory stream segregation of amplitude-modulated narrowband noise in cochlear implant users and individuals with normal hearing.

Matz A, Nie Y, Wheeler H Front Psychol. 2022; 13:927854.

PMID: 36118488 PMC: 9479457. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.927854.


The Role of Temporal Cues in Voluntary Stream Segregation for Cochlear Implant Users.

Paredes-Gallardo A, Madsen S, Dau T, Marozeau J Trends Hear. 2018; 22:2331216518773226.

PMID: 29766759 PMC: 5974563. DOI: 10.1177/2331216518773226.


Evidence Integration in Natural Acoustic Textures during Active and Passive Listening.

Gorska U, Rupp A, Boubenec Y, Celikel T, Englitz B eNeuro. 2018; 5(2).

PMID: 29662943 PMC: 5898696. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0090-18.2018.


The Role of Place Cues in Voluntary Stream Segregation for Cochlear Implant Users.

Paredes-Gallardo A, Madsen S, Dau T, Marozeau J Trends Hear. 2018; 22:2331216517750262.

PMID: 29347886 PMC: 5777547. DOI: 10.1177/2331216517750262.


References
1.
Winkler I, Sussman E, Tervaniemi M, Horvath J, Ritter W, Naatanen R . Preattentive auditory context effects. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2003; 3(1):57-77. DOI: 10.3758/cabn.3.1.57. View

2.
Hamburger H, vd Burgt M . Global field power measurement versus classical method in the determination of the latency of evoked potential components. Brain Topogr. 1991; 3(3):391-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF01129642. View

3.
Cooper H, Roberts B . Auditory stream segregation in cochlear implant listeners: measures based on temporal discrimination and interleaved melody recognition. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009; 126(4):1975-87. DOI: 10.1121/1.3203210. View

4.
Lehmann D, Skrandies W . Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1980; 48(6):609-21. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(80)90419-8. View

5.
Hill P, McArthur G, Bishop D . Phonological categorization of vowels: a mismatch negativity study. Neuroreport. 2004; 15(14):2195-9. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200410050-00010. View