» Articles » PMID: 29766759

The Role of Temporal Cues in Voluntary Stream Segregation for Cochlear Implant Users

Overview
Journal Trends Hear
Date 2018 May 17
PMID 29766759
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The role of temporal cues in sequential stream segregation was investigated in cochlear implant (CI) listeners using a delay detection task composed of a sequence of bursts of pulses (B) on a single electrode interleaved with a second sequence (A) presented on the same electrode with a different pulse rate. In half of the trials, a delay was added to the last burst of the otherwise regular B sequence and the listeners were asked to detect this delay. As a jitter was added to the period between consecutive A bursts, time judgments between the A and B sequences provided an unreliable cue to perform the task. Thus, the segregation of the A and B sequences should improve performance. The pulse rate difference and the duration of the sequences were varied between trials. The performance in the detection task improved by increasing both the pulse rate differences and the sequence duration. This suggests that CI listeners can use pulse rate differences to segregate sequential sounds and that a segregated percept builds up over time. In addition, the contribution of place versus temporal cues for voluntary stream segregation was assessed by combining the results from this study with those from our previous study, where the same paradigm was used to determine the role of place cues on stream segregation. Pitch height differences between the A and the B sounds accounted for the results from both studies, suggesting that stream segregation is related to the salience of the perceptual difference between the sounds.

Citing Articles

The Relationship of Pitch Discrimination with Segregation of Tonal and Speech Streams for Cochlear Implant Users.

Camarena A, Ardis M, Fujioka T, Fitzgerald M, Goldsworthy R Trends Hear. 2024; 28:23312165241305049.

PMID: 39668613 PMC: 11639003. DOI: 10.1177/23312165241305049.


Contribution of Temporal Fine Structure Cues to Concurrent Vowel Identification and Perception of Zebra Speech.

Serrao D, Theruvan N, Fathima H, Pitchaimuthu A Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 28(3):e492-e501.

PMID: 38974629 PMC: 11226255. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1785456.


Spectral Grouping of Electrically Encoded Sound Predicts Speech-in-Noise Performance in Cochlear Implantees.

Choi I, Gander P, Berger J, Woo J, Choy M, Hong J J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2023; 24(6):607-617.

PMID: 38062284 PMC: 10752853. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-023-00918-x.


Auditory stream segregation of amplitude-modulated narrowband noise in cochlear implant users and individuals with normal hearing.

Matz A, Nie Y, Wheeler H Front Psychol. 2022; 13:927854.

PMID: 36118488 PMC: 9479457. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.927854.


Rapid Assessment of Non-Verbal Auditory Perception in Normal-Hearing Participants and Cochlear Implant Users.

Pralus A, Hermann R, Cholvy F, Aguera P, Moulin A, Barone P J Clin Med. 2021; 10(10).

PMID: 34068067 PMC: 8152499. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10102093.


References
1.
Grimault N, Bacon S, Micheyl C . Auditory stream segregation on the basis of amplitude-modulation rate. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002; 111(3):1340-8. DOI: 10.1121/1.1452740. View

2.
Roberts B, Glasberg B, Moore B . Effects of the build-up and resetting of auditory stream segregation on temporal discrimination. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008; 34(4):992-1006. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.992. View

3.
Singh P, Bregman A . The influence of different timbre attributes on the perceptual segregation of complex-tone sequences. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998; 102(4):1943-52. DOI: 10.1121/1.419688. View

4.
Duran S, Collins L, Throckmorton C . Stream segregation on a single electrode as a function of pulse rate in cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012; 132(6):3849-55. PMC: 3528732. DOI: 10.1121/1.4764875. View

5.
Stainsby T, Fullgrabe C, Flanagan H, Waldman S, Moore B . Sequential streaming due to manipulation of interaural time differences. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011; 130(2):904-14. DOI: 10.1121/1.3605540. View