» Articles » PMID: 25305340

Nanodomain Organization of Rhodopsin in Native Human and Murine Rod Outer Segment Disc Membranes

Overview
Specialties Biochemistry
Biophysics
Date 2014 Oct 12
PMID 25305340
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Biological membranes display distinct domains that organize membrane proteins and signaling molecules to facilitate efficient and reliable signaling. The organization of rhodopsin, a G protein-coupled receptor, in native rod outer segment disc membranes was investigated by atomic force microscopy. Atomic force microscopy revealed that rhodopsin is arranged into domains of variable size, which we refer to herein as nanodomains, in native membranes. Quantitative analysis of 150 disc membranes revealed that the physical properties of nanodomains are conserved in humans and mice and that the properties of individual disc membranes can be variable. Examining the variable properties of disc membranes revealed some of the factors contributing to the size of rod outer segment discs and the formation of nanodomains in the membrane. The diameter of rod outer segment discs was dependent on the number of rhodopsin molecules incorporated into the membrane but independent of the spatial density of rhodopsin. The number of nanodomains present in a single disc was also dependent on the number of rhodopsin molecules incorporated into the membrane. The size of the nanodomains was largely independent of the number or spatial density of rhodopsin in the membrane.

Citing Articles

Understanding the Rhodopsin Worldview Through Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM): Structure, Stability, and Activity Studies.

Senapati S, Park P Chem Rec. 2023; 23(10):e202300113.

PMID: 37265335 PMC: 10908267. DOI: 10.1002/tcr.202300113.


Kinetics of cone specific G-protein signaling in avian photoreceptor cells.

Yee C, Gortemaker K, Wellpott R, Koch K Front Mol Neurosci. 2023; 16:1107025.

PMID: 36733826 PMC: 9887155. DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2023.1107025.


A hybrid stochastic/deterministic model of single photon response and light adaptation in mouse rods.

Beelen C, Asteriti S, Cangiano L, Koch K, DellOrco D Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021; 19:3720-3734.

PMID: 34285774 PMC: 8258797. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.06.033.


Supramolecular organization of rhodopsin in rod photoreceptor cell membranes.

Park P Pflugers Arch. 2021; 473(9):1361-1376.

PMID: 33591421 PMC: 8364927. DOI: 10.1007/s00424-021-02522-5.


Differential Aggregation Properties of Mutant Human and Bovine Rhodopsin.

Vasudevan S, Park P Biochemistry. 2020; 60(1):6-18.

PMID: 33356167 PMC: 7863732. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00733.


References
1.
Muller D . AFM: a nanotool in membrane biology. Biochemistry. 2008; 47(31):7986-98. DOI: 10.1021/bi800753x. View

2.
Dartnall H . The photosensitivities of visual pigments in the presence of hydroxylamine. Vision Res. 1968; 8(4):339-58. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(68)90104-1. View

3.
Caldwell R, McLaughlin B . Freeze-fracture study of filipin binding in photoreceptor outer segments and pigment epithelium of dystrophic and normal retinas. J Comp Neurol. 1985; 236(4):523-37. DOI: 10.1002/cne.902360408. View

4.
Schoneberg J, Heck M, Hofmann K, Noe F . Explicit spatiotemporal simulation of receptor-G protein coupling in rod cell disk membranes. Biophys J. 2014; 107(5):1042-1053. PMC: 4156778. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.05.050. View

5.
Downer N, Englander S . Hydrogen exchange study of membrane-bound rhodopsin. I. Protein structure. J Biol Chem. 1977; 252(22):8092-100. View