» Articles » PMID: 25287377

Antegrade Continence Enema (ACE): Predictors of Outcome in 111 Patients

Overview
Date 2014 Oct 8
PMID 25287377
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The antegrade continence enema (ACE) is used as a means of managing faecal incontinence and constipation with varying outcomes. We aim to evaluate our outcomes of ACEs and identify predictors of outcome.

Methods: A retrospective case-note review of patients ≤16 years of age undergoing an ACE (March 2000-September 2013) was carried out. Data collected included: patient demographics, functional outcomes and complications. Data are quoted as median (range) and compared using Mann-Whitney and Fisher's exact test. Univariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of successful outcomes. P < 0.05 is significant. Successful outcome = total continence/occasional leakage and failed outcome = regular soiling and/or constipation.

Results: 111 patients with complete data sets underwent an ACE [59% male, median age = 9.5 years (3.4-16 years)] and median follow-up = 48 months (4 months-11 years 4 months). Underlying diagnoses were idiopathic constipation (n = 68), anorectal malformation (n = 27), neuropathic bowel (n = 7), Hirschsprung disease (n = 5) and gastrointestinal dysmotility (n = 4). Social continence was achieved in 87/111 (78%). Fifteen percent of patients underwent reversal of ACE due to resolution of symptoms. There was no difference in outcomes related to diagnosis, gender, age or follow-up duration. Complication rate was 20.7% (23/111).

Conclusions: The ACE is safe and effective in the management of intractable constipation and soiling. No predictors of outcome were identified.

Citing Articles

Strategies used for childhood chronic functional constipation: the SUCCESS evidence synthesis.

Todhunter-Brown A, Booth L, Campbell P, Cheer B, Cowie J, Elders A Health Technol Assess. 2024; 28(5):1-266.

PMID: 38343084 PMC: 11017632. DOI: 10.3310/PLTR9622.


State of the Art Bowel Management for Pediatric Colorectal Problems: Hirschsprung Disease.

Bokova E, Prasade N, Janumpally S, Rosen J, Lim I, Levitt M Children (Basel). 2023; 10(8).

PMID: 37628417 PMC: 10453740. DOI: 10.3390/children10081418.


Refractory functional constipation: clinical management or appendicostomy?.

Arruda V, Bellomo-Brandao M, Bustorff-Silva J, Lomazi E J Pediatr (Rio J). 2018; 96(2):210-216.

PMID: 30352206 PMC: 9432165. DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2018.09.001.


Diagnosis and management of bladder bowel dysfunction in children with urinary tract infections: a position statement from the International Children's Continence Society.

Yang S, Chua M, Bauer S, Wright A, Brandstrom P, Hoebeke P Pediatr Nephrol. 2017; 33(12):2207-2219.

PMID: 28975420 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-017-3799-9.


How long will I have my ACE? The natural history of the antegrade continence enema stoma in idiopathic constipation.

Khoo A, Askouni E, Basson S, Ng J, Cleeve S Pediatr Surg Int. 2017; 33(11):1159-1166.

PMID: 28856416 DOI: 10.1007/s00383-017-4128-x.


References
1.
Antao B, Ng J, Roberts J . Laparoscopic antegrade continence enema using a two-port technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2006; 16(2):168-73. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2006.16.168. View

2.
Curry J, Osborne A, Malone P . How to achieve a successful Malone antegrade continence enema. J Pediatr Surg. 1998; 33(1):138-41. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(98)90381-5. View

3.
Masadeh M, Krein M, Peterson J, Bauer M, Phearman L, Pitcher G . Outcome of antegrade continent enema (ACE) procedures in children and young adults. J Pediatr Surg. 2013; 48(10):2128-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.04.009. View

4.
Aksnes G, Diseth T, Helseth A, Edwin B, Stange M, Aafos G . Appendicostomy for antegrade enema: effects on somatic and psychosocial functioning in children with myelomeningocele. Pediatrics. 2002; 109(3):484-9. DOI: 10.1542/peds.109.3.484. View

5.
Rajindrajith S, Devanarayana N, Benninga M . Review article: faecal incontinence in children: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical evaluation and management. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012; 37(1):37-48. DOI: 10.1111/apt.12103. View