» Articles » PMID: 21502828

Long-term Follow-up of Patients After Antegrade Continence Enema Procedure

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2011 Apr 20
PMID 21502828
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Antegrade continence enema (ACE) has become an important therapeutic modality in the treatment of intractable constipation and fecal incontinence. There are little data available on the long-term performance of the ACE procedure in children.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent the ACE procedure was conducted. Irrigation characteristics and complications were noted. Outcome was assessed for individual encounters based on frequency of bowel movements, incontinence, pain, and predictability.

Results: One hundred seventeen patients underwent an ACE. One hundred five patients had at least 6 months of follow-up, and were included in the analysis. Diagnoses included myelodysplasia (39%), functional intractable constipation (26%), anorectal malformations (21%), nonrelaxing internal anal sphincter (7%), cerebral palsy (3%), and other diagnoses (4%). The average follow-up was 68 months (range 7-178 months). At the last follow-up, 69% of patients had successful bowel management. Of the 31% of patients who did not have successful bowel management, 20% were using the ACE despite suboptimal results, 10% required surgical removal, and 2% were not using the ACE because of behavioral opposition to it. Patients were started on normal saline, but were switched to GoLYTELY (PEG-3350 and electrolyte solution) if there was an inadequate response (61% at final encounter). Additives were needed in 34% of patients. The average irrigation dose was 23 ± 0.7 mL/kg. The average toilet sitting time was 51.7 ± 3.5 minutes, with infusions running for 12.1 ± 1.2 minutes. Stomal complications occurred in 63% (infection, leakage, and stenosis) of patients, 33% required surgical revision and 6% eventually required diverting ostomies.

Conclusions: Long-term use of the ACE gives successful results in 69% of patients, whereas 63% had a stoma-related complication and 33% required surgical revision of the stoma.

Citing Articles

Treatments for intractable constipation in childhood.

Gordon M, Grafton-Clarke C, Rajindrajith S, Benninga M, Sinopoulou V, Akobeng A Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 6:CD014580.

PMID: 38895907 PMC: 11190639. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014580.pub2.


The urologist's role in bowel management of adult spina bifida: a narrative review.

Sundell M, Koch G, Kaufman M Transl Androl Urol. 2024; 13(1):116-126.

PMID: 38404547 PMC: 10891392. DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-389.


Strategies used for childhood chronic functional constipation: the SUCCESS evidence synthesis.

Todhunter-Brown A, Booth L, Campbell P, Cheer B, Cowie J, Elders A Health Technol Assess. 2024; 28(5):1-266.

PMID: 38343084 PMC: 11017632. DOI: 10.3310/PLTR9622.


Is an Antireflux Procedure Necessary for a Successful Appendicostomy? The Simplified Malone Antegrade Continence Enema Procedure.

Karmarkar S, Sushma A, Bangar A, Krishnan J J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2023; 28(4):288-292.

PMID: 37635878 PMC: 10455713. DOI: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_40_23.


Does the Oral-Anal Transit Test Correlate with Colonic Manometry Findings in Children with Refractory Constipation?.

Dranove J, Fleishman N, Reddy S, Teich S Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2020; 23(2):137-145.

PMID: 32206626 PMC: 7073376. DOI: 10.5223/pghn.2020.23.2.137.


References
1.
Curry J, Osborne A, Malone P . The MACE procedure: experience in the United Kingdom. J Pediatr Surg. 1999; 34(2):338-40. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(99)90204-x. View

2.
van den Berg M, Hogan M, Caniano D, Di Lorenzo C, Benninga M, Mousa H . Colonic manometry as predictor of cecostomy success in children with defecation disorders. J Pediatr Surg. 2006; 41(4):730-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.12.018. View

3.
Soylet Y, Yesildag E, Besik C, Emir H . Antegrade continence enema--an analysis of 20 children with faecal incontinence. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2006; 16(4):251-4. DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-924337. View

4.
Marshall J, Hutson J, Anticich N, Stanton M . Antegrade continence enemas in the treatment of slow-transit constipation. J Pediatr Surg. 2001; 36(8):1227-30. DOI: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.25768. View

5.
McAndrew H, Griffiths D, Pai K . A new complication of the Malone antegrade continence enema. J Pediatr Surg. 2002; 37(8):1216. DOI: 10.1053/jpsu.2002.34481. View