» Articles » PMID: 25286318

The Intrinsically Disordered Regions of the Drosophila Melanogaster Hox Protein Ultrabithorax Select Interacting Proteins Based on Partner Topology

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Oct 7
PMID 25286318
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Interactions between structured proteins require a complementary topology and surface chemistry to form sufficient contacts for stable binding. However, approximately one third of protein interactions are estimated to involve intrinsically disordered regions of proteins. The dynamic nature of disordered regions before and, in some cases, after binding calls into question the role of partner topology in forming protein interactions. To understand how intrinsically disordered proteins identify the correct interacting partner proteins, we evaluated interactions formed by the Drosophila melanogaster Hox transcription factor Ultrabithorax (Ubx), which contains both structured and disordered regions. Ubx binding proteins are enriched in specific folds: 23 of its 39 partners include one of 7 folds, out of the 1195 folds recognized by SCOP. For the proteins harboring the two most populated folds, DNA-RNA binding 3-helical bundles and α-α superhelices, the regions of the partner proteins that exhibit these preferred folds are sufficient for Ubx binding. Three disorder-containing regions in Ubx are required to bind these partners. These regions are either alternatively spliced or multiply phosphorylated, providing a mechanism for cellular processes to regulate Ubx-partner interactions. Indeed, partner topology correlates with the ability of individual partner proteins to bind Ubx spliceoforms. Partners bind different disordered regions within Ubx to varying extents, creating the potential for competition between partners and cooperative binding by partners. The ability of partners to bind regions of Ubx that activate transcription and regulate DNA binding provides a mechanism for partners to modulate transcription regulation by Ubx, and suggests that one role of disorder in Ubx is to coordinate multiple molecular functions in response to tissue-specific cues.

Citing Articles

Novel Antennapedia and Ultrabithorax trimeric complexes with TBP and Exd regulate transcription.

Villarreal-Puente A, Altamirano-Torres C, Jimenez-Mejia G, Hernandez-Bautista C, Montalvo-Mendez R, Vazquez M Hereditas. 2024; 161(1):25.

PMID: 39080786 PMC: 11290222. DOI: 10.1186/s41065-024-00327-x.


Interactions by Disorder - A Matter of Context.

Bugge K, Brakti I, Fernandes C, Dreier J, Lundsgaard J, Olsen J Front Mol Biosci. 2020; 7:110.

PMID: 32613009 PMC: 7308724. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.00110.


Multi-level and lineage-specific interactomes of the Hox transcription factor Ubx contribute to its functional specificity.

Carnesecchi J, Sigismondo G, Domsch K, Baader C, Rafiee M, Krijgsveld J Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):1388.

PMID: 32170121 PMC: 7069958. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15223-x.


Evidence for a Strong Correlation Between Transcription Factor Protein Disorder and Organismic Complexity.

Yruela I, Oldfield C, Niklas K, Dunker A Genome Biol Evol. 2017; 9(5):1248-1265.

PMID: 28430951 PMC: 5434936. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evx073.


The Drosophila Hox gene Ultrabithorax acts in both muscles and motoneurons to orchestrate formation of specific neuromuscular connections.

Hessinger C, Technau G, Rogulja-Ortmann A Development. 2016; 144(1):139-150.

PMID: 27913640 PMC: 5278631. DOI: 10.1242/dev.143875.


References
1.
Yura K, Hayward S . The interwinding nature of protein-protein interfaces and its implication for protein complex formation. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25(23):3108-13. PMC: 2778332. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp563. View

2.
Panni S, Montecchi-Palazzi L, Kiemer L, Cabibbo A, Paoluzi S, Santonico E . Combining peptide recognition specificity and context information for the prediction of the 14-3-3-mediated interactome in S. cerevisiae and H. sapiens. Proteomics. 2010; 11(1):128-43. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201000030. View

3.
Buljan M, Chalancon G, Eustermann S, Wagner G, Fuxreiter M, Bateman A . Tissue-specific splicing of disordered segments that embed binding motifs rewires protein interaction networks. Mol Cell. 2012; 46(6):871-83. PMC: 3437557. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.039. View

4.
Patil A, Kinoshita K, Nakamura H . Hub promiscuity in protein-protein interaction networks. Int J Mol Sci. 2010; 11(4):1930-43. PMC: 2871146. DOI: 10.3390/ijms11041930. View

5.
Johnson F, Parker E, Krasnow M . Extradenticle protein is a selective cofactor for the Drosophila homeotics: role of the homeodomain and YPWM amino acid motif in the interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995; 92(3):739-43. PMC: 42695. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.92.3.739. View