A Comparison of Calls Subjected to a Malpractice Claim Versus 'normal Calls' Within the Swedish Healthcare Direct: a Case-control Study

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2014 Oct 5

PMID 25280808

Citations 13

Authors

Annica Ernesater

Maria Engstrom

Ulrika Winblad

Inger K Holmstrom

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare communication patterns in calls subjected to a malpractice claim with matched controls.

Setting: In many countries, telephone advice nursing is patients' first contact with healthcare. Telenurses' assessment of callers' symptoms and needs are based on verbal communication only, and problems with over-triage and under-triage have been reported.

Participants: A total sample of all reported medical errors (n=33) during the period 2003-2010 within Swedish Healthcare Direct was retrieved. Corresponding calls were thereafter identified and collected as sound files from the manager in charge at the respective call centres. For technical reasons, calls from four of the cases were not possible to retrieve. For the present study, matched control calls (n=26) based on the patient's age, gender and main symptom presented by the caller were collected.

Results: Male patients were in majority (n=16), and the most common reasons for calling were abdominal pain (n=10) and chest pain (n=5). There were statistically significant differences between the communication in the cases and controls: telenurses used fewer open-ended medical questions (p<0.001) in the cases compared to the control calls; callers provided telenurses with more medical information in the control calls compared to the cases (p=0.001); and telenurses used more facilitation and patient activation activities in the control calls (p=0.034), such as back-channel response (p=0.001), compared to the cases.

Conclusions: The present study shows that telenurses in malpractice claimed calls used more closed-ended questioning compared to those in control calls, who used more open-ended questioning and back-channel response, which provided them with richer medical descriptions and more information from the caller. Hence, these communicative techniques are important in addition to solid medical and nursing competence and sound decision aid systems.

Citing Articles

Factors affecting communication during telephone triage in medical call centres: a mixed methods systematic review.

Fotland S, Midtbo V, Vik J, Zakariassen E, Johansen I Syst Rev. 2024; 13(1):162.

PMID: 38909273 PMC: 11193260. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02580-7.

The telephone nursing dialogue process: an integrative review.

Gustafsson S, Wahlberg A BMC Nurs. 2023; 22(1):345.

PMID: 37770869 PMC: 10537534. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-023-01509-0.

The Role of Telemedicine in Prehospital Traumatic Hand Injury Evaluation.

Avila F, Carter R, McLeod C, Bruce C, Guliyeva G, Torres-Guzman R Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(6).

PMID: 36980474 PMC: 10047211. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13061165.

Symptoms of Acute Myocardial Infarction as Described in Calls to Tele-Nurses and in Questionnaires: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Angerud K, Ericsson M, Brannstrom M, Lawesson S, Stromberg A, Thylen I J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022; 38(2):150-157.

PMID: 36156094 PMC: 9924961. DOI: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000873.

How parents express their worry in calls to a medical helpline: a mixed methods study.

Gren C, Pedersen M, Hasselager A, Folke F, Ersboll A, Cortes D BMC Prim Care. 2022; 23(1):80.

PMID: 35421930 PMC: 9012025. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01680-4.

References

Roter D, Larson S . The Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Educ Couns. 2002; 46(4):243-51. DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00012-5. View

Mead N, Bower P . Patient-centred consultations and outcomes in primary care: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 2002; 48(1):51-61. DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00099-x. View

Turner V, Bentley P, Hodgson S, Collard P, Drimatis R, Rabune C . Telephone triage in Western Australia. Med J Aust. 2002; 176(3):100-3. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04313.x. View

Derkx H, Rethans J, Knottnerus J, Ram P . Assessing communication skills of clinical call handlers working at an out-of-hours centre: development of the RICE rating scale. Br J Gen Pract. 2007; 57(538):383-7. PMC: 2047013. View

OCathain A, Sampson F, Munro J, Thomas K, Nicholl J . Nurses' views of using computerized decision support software in NHS Direct. J Adv Nurs. 2004; 45(3):280-6. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02894.x. View

Hasegawa T, Ogasawara C, Katz E . Measuring diagnostic competency and the analysis of factors influencing competency using written case studies. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2007; 18(3):93-102. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-618X.2007.00057.x. View

Hansen E, Hunskaar S . Understanding of and adherence to advice after telephone counselling by nurse: a survey among callers to a primary emergency out-of-hours service in Norway. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011; 19:48. PMC: 3177778. DOI: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-48. View

Huibers L, Smits M, Renaud V, Giesen P, Wensing M . Safety of telephone triage in out-of-hours care: a systematic review. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011; 29(4):198-209. PMC: 3308461. DOI: 10.3109/02813432.2011.629150. View

Stewart M, Brown J, Weston W . Patient-Centred Interviewing Part III: Five Provocative Questions. Can Fam Physician. 2011; 35:159-61. PMC: 2280442. View

10.

Mead N, Bower P, Hann M . The impact of general practitioners' patient-centredness on patients' post-consultation satisfaction and enablement. Soc Sci Med. 2002; 55(2):283-99. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00171-x. View

11.

Derkx H, Rethans J, Maiburg B, Winkens R, Muijtjens A, van Rooij H . Quality of communication during telephone triage at Dutch out-of-hours centres. Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 74(2):174-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.08.002. View

12.

Moll van Charante E, Ter Riet G, Drost S, van der Linden L, Klazinga N, Bindels P . Nurse telephone triage in out-of-hours GP practice: determinants of independent advice and return consultation. BMC Fam Pract. 2006; 7:74. PMC: 1713241. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-74. View

13.

Street Jr R, Makoul G, Arora N, Epstein R . How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 74(3):295-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.015. View

14.

Fernald D, Pace W, Harris D, West D, Main D, Westfall J . Event reporting to a primary care patient safety reporting system: a report from the ASIPS collaborative. Ann Fam Med. 2004; 2(4):327-32. PMC: 1466702. DOI: 10.1370/afm.221. View

15.

Stevenson A . Compassion and patient centred care. Aust Fam Physician. 2003; 31(12):1103-6. View

16.

Holmstrom I, Hoglund A . The faceless encounter: ethical dilemmas in telephone nursing. J Clin Nurs. 2007; 16(10):1865-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01839.x. View

17.

Ernesater A, Engstrom M, Holmstrom I, Winblad U . Incident reporting in nurse-led national telephone triage in Sweden: the reported errors reveal a pattern that needs to be broken. J Telemed Telecare. 2010; 16(5):243-7. DOI: 10.1258/jtt.2009.090813. View

18.

Ernesater A, Holmstrom I, Engstrom M . Telenurses' experiences of working with computerized decision support: supporting, inhibiting and quality improving. J Adv Nurs. 2009; 65(5):1074-83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.04966.x. View

19.

Kaminsky E, Rosenqvist U, Holmstrom I . Telenurses' understanding of work: detective or educator?. J Adv Nurs. 2008; 65(2):382-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04877.x. View

20.

Roing M, Holmstrom I . Malpractice claims in Swedish telenursing: lessons learned from interviews with telenurses and managers. Nurs Res. 2014; 64(1):35-43. DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000063. View