» Articles » PMID: 25264426

Tests of a Dual-systems Model of Speech Category Learning

Overview
Date 2014 Sep 30
PMID 25264426
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the visual domain, more than two decades of work posits the existence of dual category learning systems. The system uses working memory to develop and test rules for classifying in an explicit fashion. The system operates by implicitly associating perception with actions that lead to reinforcement. Dual-systems models posit that in learning natural categories, learners initially use the reflective system and with practice, transfer control to the reflexive system. The role of reflective and reflexive systems in second language (L2) speech learning has not been systematically examined. Here monolingual, native speakers of American English were trained to categorize Mandarin tones produced by multiple talkers. Our computational modeling approach demonstrates that learners use reflective and reflexive strategies during tone category learning. Successful learners use talker-dependent, reflective analysis early in training and reflexive strategies by the end of training. Our results demonstrate that dual-learning systems are operative in L2 speech learning. Critically, learner strategies directly relate to individual differences in category learning success.

Citing Articles

Individual differences in working memory impact the trajectory of non-native speech category learning.

Roark C, Paulon G, Rebaudo G, McHaney J, Sarkar A, Chandrasekaran B PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0297917.

PMID: 38857268 PMC: 11164376. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297917.


Distribution-dependent representations in auditory category learning and generalization.

Gan Z, Zheng L, Wang S, Feng G Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1132570.

PMID: 37829077 PMC: 10566369. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1132570.


Bayesian Semiparametric Longitudinal Drift-Diffusion Mixed Models for Tone Learning in Adults.

Paulon G, Llanos F, Chandrasekaran B, Sarkar A J Am Stat Assoc. 2021; 116(535):1114-1127.

PMID: 34650315 PMC: 8513775. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1801448.


Emerging native-similar neural representations underlie non-native speech category learning success.

Feng G, Li Y, Hsu S, Wong P, Chou T, Chandrasekaran B Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2021; 2(2):280-307.

PMID: 34368775 PMC: 8345815. DOI: 10.1162/nol_a_00035.


Integrating prediction errors at two time scales permits rapid recalibration of speech sound categories.

Olasagasti I, Giraud A Elife. 2020; 9.

PMID: 32223894 PMC: 7217692. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.44516.


References
1.
Yeterian E, Pandya D . Corticostriatal connections of the superior temporal region in rhesus monkeys. J Comp Neurol. 1998; 399(3):384-402. View

2.
Ashby F, OBrien J . Category learning and multiple memory systems. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005; 9(2):83-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.003. View

3.
Lively S, Logan J, Pisoni D . Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993; 94(3 Pt 1):1242-55. PMC: 3509365. DOI: 10.1121/1.408177. View

4.
Lotto A . Language acquisition as complex category formation. Phonetica. 2000; 57(2-4):189-96. DOI: 10.1159/000028472. View

5.
Nomura E, Maddox W, Filoteo J, Ing A, Gitelman D, Parrish T . Neural correlates of rule-based and information-integration visual category learning. Cereb Cortex. 2006; 17(1):37-43. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhj122. View