» Articles » PMID: 25179615

A Comparison of Professional-level Faculty and Student Perceptions of Active Learning: Its Current Use, Effectiveness, and Barriers

Overview
Date 2014 Sep 3
PMID 25179615
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Active learning is an instructional method in which students become engaged participants in the classroom through the use of in-class written exercises, games, problem sets, audience-response systems, debates, class discussions, etc. Despite evidence supporting the effectiveness of active learning strategies, minimal adoption of the technique has occurred in many professional programs. The goal of this study was to compare the perceptions of active learning between students who were exposed to active learning in the classroom (n = 116) and professional-level physiology faculty members (n = 9). Faculty members reported a heavy reliance on lectures and minimal use of educational games and activities, whereas students indicated that they learned best via the activities. A majority of faculty members (89%) had observed active learning in the classroom and predicted favorable effects of the method on student performance and motivation. The main reported barriers by faculty members to the adoption of active learning were a lack of necessary class time, a high comfort level with traditional lectures, and insufficient time to develop materials. Students hypothesized similar obstacles for faculty members but also associated many negative qualities with the traditional lecturers. Despite these barriers, a majority of faculty members (78%) were interested in learning more about the alternative teaching strategy. Both faculty members and students indicated that active learning should occupy portions (29% vs. 40%) of face-to-face class time.

Citing Articles

Experiential Learning of Active Learning Strategies in Mentor Learner Web-based Discussions: A Perceptions Study.

Chauhan A, Begum J, Lavanya K, Gupta A, Ghosh S, Kulkarni S Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2025; 14(4):258-265.

PMID: 39749172 PMC: 11691109. DOI: 10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_277_24.


Assessing the Effectiveness of Student-generated Scenario-based Questions as a Tool for Active Learning.

Dhar D, Saiyad S, Mahajan N Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2025; 14(4):278-283.

PMID: 39749163 PMC: 11691096. DOI: 10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_320_24.


The role of combined problem-based learning (PBL) and case-based learning (CBL) teaching methodologies in dental education.

Manas A, Ismail P, Mohan R, Madiraju G, Mulla M, Mulla M J Educ Health Promot. 2024; 13:417.

PMID: 39703663 PMC: 11658036. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1824_23.


Refocusing graduate gross anatomy training: Curating future content experts.

Elliott G, Pinhal-Enfield G Anat Sci Educ. 2024; 18(1):27-31.

PMID: 39552025 PMC: 11669071. DOI: 10.1002/ase.2535.


A comparative analysis of game-based learning and conventional learning in dental education.

Fernandez-Gomez F, Cosin-Villanueva M, Alminana-Pastor P, Lopez-Roldan A J Dent Educ. 2024; 89(3):414-420.

PMID: 39436274 PMC: 11903914. DOI: 10.1002/jdd.13747.


References
1.
Ernst H, Colthorpe K . The efficacy of interactive lecturing for students with diverse science backgrounds. Adv Physiol Educ. 2007; 31(1):41-4. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00107.2006. View

2.
van den Bergh L, Ros A, Beijaard D . Teacher feedback during active learning: current practices in primary schools. Br J Educ Psychol. 2013; 83(Pt 2):341-62. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02073.x. View

3.
Ochsendorf F, Boehncke W, Sommerlad M, Kaufmann R . Interactive large-group teaching in a dermatology course. Med Teach. 2007; 28(8):697-701. DOI: 10.1080/01421590601034241. View

4.
Lom B . Classroom Activities: Simple Strategies to Incorporate Student-Centered Activities within Undergraduate Science Lectures. J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2013; 11(1):A64-71. PMC: 3592730. View

5.
Silverthorn D, Thorn P, Svinicki M . It's difficult to change the way we teach: lessons from the Integrative Themes in Physiology curriculum module project. Adv Physiol Educ. 2006; 30(4):204-14. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00064.2006. View