» Articles » PMID: 19723815

Active Learning and Student-centered Pedagogy Improve Student Attitudes and Performance in Introductory Biology

Overview
Date 2009 Sep 3
PMID 19723815
Citations 134
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We describe the development and implementation of an instructional design that focused on bringing multiple forms of active learning and student-centered pedagogies to a one-semester, undergraduate introductory biology course for both majors and nonmajors. Our course redesign consisted of three major elements: 1) reordering the presentation of the course content in an attempt to teach specific content within the context of broad conceptual themes, 2) incorporating active and problem-based learning into every lecture, and 3) adopting strategies to create a more student-centered learning environment. Assessment of our instructional design consisted of a student survey and comparison of final exam performance across 3 years-1 year before our course redesign was implemented (2006) and during two successive years of implementation (2007 and 2008). The course restructuring led to significant improvement of self-reported student engagement and satisfaction and increased academic performance. We discuss the successes and ongoing challenges of our course restructuring and consider issues relevant to institutional change.

Citing Articles

From Fragmented Facts to Unified Knowledge: Exploring Concept Mapping in Neuromuscular Physiology Among First-Year Medical Students.

Shanmugarajah M, Mondal H, Das T Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e74711.

PMID: 39734978 PMC: 11682845. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.74711.


Project-Based Learning Adapted as a Physiology Teaching Strategy for the Sophomore Undergraduate Medical Students.

Montrezor L, Passos C Med Sci Educ. 2024; 34(5):1071-1078.

PMID: 39450037 PMC: 11496411. DOI: 10.1007/s40670-024-02092-y.


Guidance on the assessment of learning outcomes for those designing procedures and projects - Report of an ETPLAS Working Group.

Dontas I, Fry D, Lewis D, Applebee K, Fentener van Vlissingen M, Marinou K Lab Anim. 2024; 58(6):626-639.

PMID: 39308215 PMC: 11633073. DOI: 10.1177/00236772241244527.


Time spent on active learning activities does not necessarily correlate with student exam performance: a controlled case study.

Cen X, Lee R, Contreras C, Owens M, Maloy J J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2024; 25(3):e0007324.

PMID: 39162426 PMC: 11636264. DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.00073-24.


Applying 3D Models of Giant Salamanders to Explore Form-Function Relationships in Early Digit-Bearing Tetrapods.

Kawano S, Martin J, Medina J, Doherty C, Zheng G, Hsiao E Integr Comp Biol. 2024; 64(3):715-728.

PMID: 39096158 PMC: 11428317. DOI: 10.1093/icb/icae129.


References
1.
Miller S, Pfund C, Pribbenow C, Handelsman J . The pipeline. Scientific teaching in practice. Science. 2008; 322(5906):1329-30. DOI: 10.1126/science.1166032. View

2.
Wilson C, Anderson C, Heidemann M, Merrill J, Merritt B, Richmond G . Assessing students' ability to trace matter in dynamic systems in cell biology. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2006; 5(4):323-31. PMC: 1681358. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.06-02-0142. View

3.
Preszler R, Dawe A, Shuster C, Shuster M . Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2007; 6(1):29-41. PMC: 1854854. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.06-09-0190. View

4.
Allen D, Tanner K . Infusing active learning into the large-enrollment biology class: seven strategies, from the simple to complex. Cell Biol Educ. 2005; 4(4):262-8. PMC: 1305885. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.05-08-0113. View

5.
Wright R, Boggs J . Learning cell biology as a team: a project-based approach to upper-division cell biology. Cell Biol Educ. 2003; 1(4):145-53. PMC: 149487. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.02-03-0006. View