» Articles » PMID: 25166623

The Value of Routine Evaluation of Gastric Residuals in Very Low Birth Weight Infants

Overview
Journal J Perinatol
Date 2014 Aug 29
PMID 25166623
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Little information exists regarding gastric residual (GR) evaluation prior to feedings in premature infants. The purpose of this study was to compare the amount of feedings at 2 and 3 weeks of age, number of days to full feedings, growth and incidence of complications between infants who underwent RGR (routine evaluation of GR) evaluation versus those who did not.

Study Design: Sixty-one premature infants were randomized to one of two groups. Group 1 received RGR evaluation prior to feeds and Group 2 did not.

Result: There was no difference in amount of feeding at 2 (P=0.66) or 3 (P=0.41) weeks of age, growth, days on parenteral nutrition or complications. Although not statistically significant, infants without RGR evaluation reached feeds of 150 ml kg(-1) per day 6 days earlier and had 6 fewer days with central venous access.

Conclusion: RESULTs suggest RGR evaluation may not improve nutritional outcomes in premature infants.

Citing Articles

Nutritional Strategies for Preterm Neonates and Preterm Neonates Undergoing Surgery: New Insights for Practice and Wrong Beliefs to Uproot.

De Rose D, Lapillonne A, Iacobelli S, Capolupo I, Dotta A, Salvatori G Nutrients. 2024; 16(11).

PMID: 38892652 PMC: 11174646. DOI: 10.3390/nu16111719.


Gastric residual volume monitoring practices in UK intensive care units: A web-based survey.

Jenkins B, Calder P, Marino L J Intensive Care Soc. 2024; 25(2):156-163.

PMID: 38737302 PMC: 11086716. DOI: 10.1177/17511437231210483.


Influence of gastric residual assessment in preterm neonates on time to achieve enteral feeding (the GRASS trial)-Multi-centre, assessor-blinded randomised clinical trial.

Branagan A, Murphy C, OSullivan A, Bodnarova I, Feyereislova S, Berka I Eur J Pediatr. 2024; 183(5):2325-2332.

PMID: 38427039 PMC: 11035479. DOI: 10.1007/s00431-024-05483-w.


The Practice of Enteral Nutrition: Clinical Evidence for Feeding Protocols.

Salas A, Travers C Clin Perinatol. 2023; 50(3):607-623.

PMID: 37536767 PMC: 10599301. DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2023.04.005.


Routine monitoring of gastric residual for prevention of necrotising enterocolitis in preterm infants.

Abiramalatha T, Thanigainathan S, Ramaswamy V, Rajaiah B, Ramakrishnan S Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 6:CD012937.

PMID: 37327390 PMC: 10275261. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012937.pub3.


References
1.
Cole C, Hansen N, Higgins R, Bell E, Shankaran S, Laptook A . Bloodstream infections in very low birth weight infants with intestinal failure. J Pediatr. 2011; 160(1):54-9.e2. PMC: 3419271. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.06.034. View

2.
Mihatsch W, von Schoenaich P, Fahnenstich H, Dehne N, Ebbecke H, Plath C . The significance of gastric residuals in the early enteral feeding advancement of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2002; 109(3):457-9. DOI: 10.1542/peds.109.3.457. View

3.
Flidel-Rimon O, Branski D, Shinwell E . The fear of necrotizing enterocolitis versus achieving optimal growth in preterm infants--an opinion. Acta Paediatr. 2006; 95(11):1341-4. DOI: 10.1080/08035250600719713. View

4.
Kliegman R . Experimental validation of neonatal feeding practices. Pediatrics. 1999; 103(2):492-3. DOI: 10.1542/peds.103.2.492. View

5.
Shulman R, Ou C, OBrian Smith E . Evaluation of potential factors predicting attainment of full gavage feedings in preterm infants. Neonatology. 2010; 99(1):38-44. PMC: 3214900. DOI: 10.1159/000302020. View