» Articles » PMID: 25152881

Connecting Mechanics and Bone Cell Activities in the Bone Remodeling Process: an Integrated Finite Element Modeling

Overview
Date 2014 Aug 26
PMID 25152881
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bone adaptation occurs as a response to external loadings and involves bone resorption by osteoclasts followed by the formation of new bone by osteoblasts. It is directly triggered by the transduction phase by osteocytes embedded within the bone matrix. The bone remodeling process is governed by the interactions between osteoblasts and osteoclasts through the expression of several autocrine and paracrine factors that control bone cell populations and their relative rate of differentiation and proliferation. A review of the literature shows that despite the progress in bone remodeling simulation using the finite element (FE) method, there is still a lack of predictive models that explicitly consider the interaction between osteoblasts and osteoclasts combined with the mechanical response of bone. The current study attempts to develop an FE model to describe the bone remodeling process, taking into consideration the activities of osteoclasts and osteoblasts. The mechanical behavior of bone is described by taking into account the bone material fatigue damage accumulation and mineralization. A coupled strain-damage stimulus function is proposed, which controls the level of autocrine and paracrine factors. The cellular behavior is based on Komarova et al.'s (2003) dynamic law, which describes the autocrine and paracrine interactions between osteoblasts and osteoclasts and computes cell population dynamics and changes in bone mass at a discrete site of bone remodeling. Therefore, when an external mechanical stress is applied, bone formation and resorption is governed by cells dynamic rather than adaptive elasticity approaches. The proposed FE model has been implemented in the FE code Abaqus (UMAT routine). An example of human proximal femur is investigated using the model developed. The model was able to predict final human proximal femur adaptation similar to the patterns observed in a human proximal femur. The results obtained reveal complex spatio-temporal bone adaptation. The proposed FEM model gives insight into how bone cells adapt their architecture to the mechanical and biological environment.

Citing Articles

Non-Linear Biomechanical Evaluation and Comparison in the Assessment of Three Different Piece Dental Implant Systems for the Molar Region: A Finite Element Study.

Serrato-Pedrosa J, Villanueva-Fierro I, Marquet-Rivera R, Hernandez-Vazquez R, Cruz-Lopez S, Loera-Castaneda V J Funct Biomater. 2025; 16(1).

PMID: 39852573 PMC: 11766260. DOI: 10.3390/jfb16010017.


Mechanobiochemical bone remodelling around an uncemented acetabular component: influence of bone orthotropy.

Saviour C, Mathai B, Gupta S Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024; 62(6):1717-1732.

PMID: 38353834 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-024-03023-0.


A case report on digital preoperative design, clinical application and finite element analysis for a patient with ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis.

Zhu L, Zhang C, Peng L, Cheng Z, Liang X Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1220102.

PMID: 37771572 PMC: 10523558. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1220102.


An orthotropic continuum model with substructure evolution for describing bone remodeling: an interpretation of the primary mechanism behind Wolff's law.

Giorgio I, dellIsola F, Andreaus U, Misra A Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2023; 22(6):2135-2152.

PMID: 37542620 PMC: 10613191. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-023-01755-w.


Impact of exogenous hydrogen peroxide on osteogenic differentiation of broiler chicken compact bones derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Tompkins Y, Liu G, Kim W Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1124355.

PMID: 36776980 PMC: 9909420. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1124355.


References
1.
Pivonka P, Zimak J, Smith D, Gardiner B, Dunstan C, Sims N . Model structure and control of bone remodeling: a theoretical study. Bone. 2008; 43(2):249-263. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.03.025. View

2.
Hernandez C, Beaupre G, Keller T, Carter D . The influence of bone volume fraction and ash fraction on bone strength and modulus. Bone. 2001; 29(1):74-8. DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(01)00467-7. View

3.
Bonfoh N, Novinyo E, Lipinski P . Modeling of bone adaptative behavior based on cells activities. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2010; 10(5):789-98. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-010-0274-y. View

4.
Maldonado S, Borchers S, Findeisen R, Allgower F . Mathematical modeling and analysis of force induced bone growth. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007; 2006:3154-7. DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260532. View

5.
Ridha H, Thurner P . Finite element prediction with experimental validation of damage distribution in single trabeculae during three-point bending tests. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013; 27:94-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.07.005. View