» Articles » PMID: 25125384

Sex Differences and Attitudes Toward Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Among Urban Black Patients on Hemodialysis

Overview
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2014 Aug 16
PMID 25125384
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: Living donor kidney transplantation, the treatment of choice for ESRD, is underused by women and blacks. To better understand sex differences in the context of potential barriers to living donor kidney transplantation, the Dialysis Patient Transplant Questionnaire was administered in two urban, predominantly black hemodialysis units.

Design, Setting, Participants, & Measurements: The Dialysis Patient Transplant Questionnaire was designed to study barriers to kidney transplantation from previously validated questions. Between July of 2008 and January of 2009, the Dialysis Patient Transplant Questionnaire was administered to 116 patients on hemodialysis, including potentially eligible and ineligible living donor kidney transplantation candidates. Of 101 patients who self-identified as black or African American, 50 (49.5%) patients had the questionnaire entirely administered by the researcher or assistant, 25 (24.8%) patients required some assistance, and 26 (25.7%) patients completed the Dialysis Patient Transplant Questionnaire entirely by themselves. Multiple logistic regression methods were used to determine if the observed bivariate associations and differences persisted when controlled for potential confounders.

Results: Women were less likely to want living donor kidney transplantation compared with men (58.5% versus 87.5%, P=0.003), despite being nearly two times as likely as men to receive unsolicited offers for kidney transplant (73.2% versus 43.2%, P=0.02). They were also less likely to have been evaluated for a kidney transplant (28.3% versus 52.2%, P=0.01). The multiple logistic regression analysis showed that sex was a statistically significant predictor of wanting living donor kidney transplantation (women versus men odds ratio, 0.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.04 to 0.46), controlling for various factors known to influence transplant decisions. A sensitivity analysis indicated that mode of administration did not bias these results.

Conclusions: In contrast to previous studies, the study found that black women were less likely to want living donor kidney transplantation compared with black men. Black women were also less likely to be evaluated for a kidney transplant, although they were more likely to receive an unsolicited living donor kidney transplantation offer.

Citing Articles

Global prevalence and potential factors influencing willingness for renal transplantation in end-stage renal disease patients: A systematic review and meta- analysis.

Tamara F, Fajar J, Susanto A, Enggriani Y, Beluan M, Mirino R Narra J. 2025; 4(3):e964.

PMID: 39816085 PMC: 11732001. DOI: 10.52225/narra.v4i3.903.


A convergent mixed methods to study registration on kidney transplantation waiting list refusal by women and men on dialysis in France.

Adoli L, Campeon A, Chatelet V, Couchoud C, Lobbedez T, Bayer F Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29106.

PMID: 39582039 PMC: 11586399. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80775-7.


Experience of Chronic Kidney Disease and Perceptions of Transplantation by Sex.

Adoli L, Campeon A, Chatelet V, Couchoud C, Lobbedez T, Bayer F JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(7):e2424993.

PMID: 39083269 PMC: 11292447. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24993.


Sex/Gender Disparities in Preemptive Referrals for Kidney Transplantation.

Harding J, Gompers A, Di M, Drewery K, Pastan S, Rossi A Kidney Int Rep. 2024; 9(7):2134-2145.

PMID: 39081771 PMC: 11284440. DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.04.025.


Systems Connected to Inequities in Access to Kidney Transplantation and the Value of Intersectionality.

Nonterah C Transpl Int. 2024; 37:11658.

PMID: 38344260 PMC: 10853452. DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.11658.


References
1.
Gillespie A, Hammer H, Lee J, Nnewihe C, Gordon J, Silva P . Lack of listing status awareness: results of a single-center survey of hemodialysis patients. Am J Transplant. 2011; 11(7):1522-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03524.x. View

2.
Epstein A, Ayanian J, Keogh J, Noonan S, Armistead N, Cleary P . Racial disparities in access to renal transplantation--clinically appropriate or due to underuse or overuse?. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343(21):1537-44, 2 p preceding 1537. PMC: 4598055. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200011233432106. View

3.
Curtis C, Rothstein M, Hong B . Stage-specific educational interventions for patients with end-stage renal disease: psychological and psychiatric considerations. Prog Transplant. 2009; 19(1):18-24. DOI: 10.1177/152692480901900103. View

4.
CRAWFORD B, Meana M, Stewart D, Cheung A . Treatment decision making in mature adults: gender differences. Health Care Women Int. 2000; 21(2):91-104. DOI: 10.1080/073993300245320. View

5.
Reese P, Shea J, Berns J, Simon M, Joffe M, Bloom R . Recruitment of live donors by candidates for kidney transplantation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008; 3(4):1152-9. PMC: 2440271. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.03660807. View