» Articles » PMID: 25122862

Collection and Characterization of Samples for Establishment of a Serum Repository for Lyme Disease Diagnostic Test Development and Evaluation

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2014 Aug 15
PMID 25122862
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Serological assays and a two-tiered test algorithm are recommended for laboratory confirmation of Lyme disease. In the United States, the sensitivity of two-tiered testing using commercially available serology-based assays is dependent on the stage of infection and ranges from 30% in the early localized disease stage to near 100% in late-stage disease. Other variables, including subjectivity in reading Western blots, compliance with two-tiered recommendations, use of different first- and second-tier test combinations, and use of different test samples, all contribute to variation in two-tiered test performance. The availability and use of sample sets from well-characterized Lyme disease patients and controls are needed to better assess the performance of existing tests and for development of improved assays. To address this need, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health prospectively collected sera from patients at all stages of Lyme disease, as well as healthy donors and patients with look-alike diseases. Patients and healthy controls were recruited using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Samples from all included patients were retrospectively characterized by two-tiered testing. The results from two-tiered testing corroborated the need for novel and improved diagnostics, particularly for laboratory diagnosis of earlier stages of infection. Furthermore, the two-tiered results provide a baseline with samples from well-characterized patients that can be used in comparing the sensitivity and specificity of novel diagnostics. Panels of sera and accompanying clinical and laboratory testing results are now available to Lyme disease serological test users and researchers developing novel tests.

Citing Articles

Development, Optimization, and Validation of a Quantitative PCR Assay for Detection in Tick, Wildlife, and Human Samples.

Lewis J, Lloyd V, Robichaud G Pathogens. 2025; 13(12.

PMID: 39770294 PMC: 11679815. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13121034.


Rapid single-tier serodiagnosis of Lyme disease.

Ghosh R, Joung H, Goncharov A, Palanisamy B, Ngo K, Pejcinovic K Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):7124.

PMID: 39164226 PMC: 11336255. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-51067-5.


Reply to Shah, J.S.; Ramasamy, R. Target Antigens in Western and Line Immunoblots for Supporting the Diagnosis of Lyme Disease. Comment on "Porwancher et al. Immunoblot Criteria for Diagnosis of Lyme Disease: A Comparison of CDC Criteria to....

Porwancher R, Levin A, Trevejo R Pathogens. 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38787205 PMC: 11124438. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13050353.


Performance of two modified two-tier algorithms for the serologic diagnosis of Lyme disease.

Landry M, Hassan S, Rottmann B, Pesak S, Ordazzo M, Skrzyniarz M J Clin Microbiol. 2024; 62(5):e0013924.

PMID: 38597655 PMC: 11077974. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00139-24.


Antibodies to and species in serum and synovial fluid from people with rheumatic diseases.

Kim L, Lashnits E, Breitschwerdt E, Elam A, Grade N, Miller J Microbiol Spectr. 2024; 12(4):e0165323.

PMID: 38483477 PMC: 10986562. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01653-23.


References
1.
Liveris D, Schwartz I, McKenna D, Nowakowski J, Nadelman R, DeMarco J . Comparison of five diagnostic modalities for direct detection of Borrelia burgdorferi in patients with early Lyme disease. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012; 73(3):243-5. PMC: 3377843. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.03.026. View

2.
Polman C, Reingold S, Edan G, Filippi M, Hartung H, Kappos L . Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the "McDonald Criteria". Ann Neurol. 2005; 58(6):840-6. DOI: 10.1002/ana.20703. View

3.
Li X, McHugh G, Damle N, Sikand V, Glickstein L, Steere A . Burden and viability of Borrelia burgdorferi in skin and joints of patients with erythema migrans or lyme arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2011; 63(8):2238-47. PMC: 5444298. DOI: 10.1002/art.30384. View

4.
Steere A, McHugh G, Damle N, Sikand V . Prospective study of serologic tests for lyme disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 47(2):188-95. PMC: 5538270. DOI: 10.1086/589242. View

5.
Aguero-Rosenfeld M, Wang G, Schwartz I, Wormser G . Diagnosis of lyme borreliosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005; 18(3):484-509. PMC: 1195970. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.18.3.484-509.2005. View