» Articles » PMID: 25092696

Interspecies Allometric Scaling of Antimalarial Drugs and Potential Application to Pediatric Dosing

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2014 Aug 6
PMID 25092696
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pharmacopeial recommendations for administration of antimalarial drugs are the same weight-based (mg/kg of body weight) doses for children and adults. However, linear calculations are known to underestimate pediatric doses; therefore, interspecies allometric scaling data may have a role in predicting doses in children. We investigated the allometric scaling relationships of antimalarial drugs using data from pharmacokinetic studies in mammalian species. Simple allometry (Y = a × W(b)) was utilized and compared to maximum life span potential (MLP) correction. All drugs showed a strong correlation with clearance (CL) in healthy controls. Insufficient data from malaria-infected species other than humans were available for allometric scaling. The allometric exponents (b) for CL of artesunate, dihydroartemisinin (from intravenous artesunate), artemether, artemisinin, clindamycin, piperaquine, mefloquine, and quinine were 0.71, 0.85, 0.66, 0.83, 0.62, 0.96, 0.52, and 0.40, respectively. Clearance was significantly lower in malaria infection than in healthy (adult) humans for quinine (0.07 versus 0.17 liter/h/kg; P = 0.0002) and dihydroartemisinin (0.81 versus 1.11 liters/h/kg; P = 0.04; power = 0.6). Interpolation of simple allometry provided better estimates of CL for children than MLP correction, which generally underestimated CL values. Pediatric dose calculations based on simple allometric exponents were 10 to 70% higher than pharmacopeial (mg/kg) recommendations. Interpolation of interspecies allometric scaling could provide better estimates than linear scaling of adult to pediatric doses of antimalarial drugs; however, the use of a fixed exponent for CL was not supported in the present study. The variability in allometric exponents for antimalarial drugs also has implications for scaling of fixed-dose combinations.

Citing Articles

Azithromycin in severe malaria bacterial co-infection in African children (TABS-PKPD): a phase II randomised controlled trial.

Connon R, Olupot-Olupot P, Pistorius A, Okiror W, Ssenyondo T, Muhindo R BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):516.

PMID: 39506794 PMC: 11542398. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03712-5.


Application of Allometric Scaling and Salisbury Rule for the Prediction of Antimalarial Drugs for First-in-Pediatric Dose Selection.

Mahmood I Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2023; 48(5):587-594.

PMID: 37566210 DOI: 10.1007/s13318-023-00848-2.


Estimation of Pediatric Dosage of Antimalarial Drugs, Using Pharmacokinetic and Physiological Approach.

Mhango E, Snorradottir B, Kachingwe B, Katundu K, Gizurarson S Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(4).

PMID: 37111562 PMC: 10140824. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041076.


Preclinical characterization and target validation of the antimalarial pantothenamide MMV693183.

de Vries L, Jansen P, Barcelo C, Munro J, Verhoef J, Pasaje C Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):2158.

PMID: 35444200 PMC: 9021288. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29688-5.


Prediction of Antimalarial Drug Clearance in Children: A Comparison of Three Different Interspecies Scaling Methods.

Mahmood I, Cheng A, Brauer E, Humeniuk R Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2015; 41(6):767-775.

PMID: 26547922 DOI: 10.1007/s13318-015-0305-2.

References
1.
Creek D, Bigira V, McCormack S, Arinaitwe E, Wanzira H, Kakuru A . Pharmacokinetic predictors for recurrent malaria after dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Ugandan infants. J Infect Dis. 2013; 207(11):1646-54. PMC: 4318925. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jit078. View

2.
Roshammar D, Hai T, Hietala S, NGUYEN VAN HUONG , Ashton M . Pharmacokinetics of piperaquine after repeated oral administration of the antimalarial combination CV8 in 12 healthy male subjects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2006; 62(5):335-41. DOI: 10.1007/s00228-005-0084-9. View

3.
Krishna S, White N . Pharmacokinetics of quinine, chloroquine and amodiaquine. Clinical implications. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1996; 30(4):263-99. DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199630040-00002. View

4.
Davis C, Bambal R, Moorthy G, Hugger E, Xiang H, Park B . Comparative preclinical drug metabolism and pharmacokinetic evaluation of novel 4-aminoquinoline anti-malarials. J Pharm Sci. 2008; 98(1):362-77. DOI: 10.1002/jps.21469. View

5.
Tod M, Jullien V, Pons G . Facilitation of drug evaluation in children by population methods and modelling. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2008; 47(4):231-43. DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200847040-00002. View