» Articles » PMID: 25074904

Ensemble Crowd Perception: a Viewpoint-invariant Mechanism to Represent Average Crowd Identity

Overview
Journal J Vis
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2014 Jul 31
PMID 25074904
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Individuals can rapidly and precisely judge the average of a set of similar items, including both low-level (Ariely, 2001) and high-level objects (Haberman & Whitney, 2007). However, to date, it is unclear whether ensemble perception is based on viewpoint-invariant object representations. Here, we tested this question by presenting participants with crowds of sequentially presented faces. The number of faces in each crowd and the viewpoint of each face varied from trial to trial. This design required participants to integrate information from multiple viewpoints into one ensemble percept. Participants reported the mean identity of crowds (e.g., family resemblance) using an adjustable, forward-oriented test face. Our results showed that participants accurately perceived the mean crowd identity even when required to incorporate information across multiple face orientations. Control experiments showed that the precision of ensemble coding was not solely dependent on the length of time participants viewed the crowd. Moreover, control analyses demonstrated that observers did not simply sample a subset of faces in the crowd but rather integrated many faces into their estimates of average crowd identity. These results demonstrate that ensemble perception can operate at the highest levels of object recognition after 3-D viewpoint-invariant faces are represented.

Citing Articles

Contribution of peripheral vision to attentional learning.

Chen C, Lee V Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023; 86(1):95-108.

PMID: 37985596 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02808-z.


Comparing explicit and implicit ensemble perception: 3 stimulus variables and 3 presentation modes.

Khayat N, Pavlovskaya M, Hochstein S Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023; 86(2):482-502.

PMID: 37821745 PMC: 10805897. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02784-4.


Peripheral vision in real-world tasks: A systematic review.

Vater C, Wolfe B, Rosenholtz R Psychon Bull Rev. 2022; 29(5):1531-1557.

PMID: 35581490 PMC: 9568462. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02117-w.


Individual Faces Were Not Discarded During Extracting Mean Emotion Representations.

Li H, Ji L, Li Q, Chen W Front Psychol. 2021; 12:713212.

PMID: 34671297 PMC: 8520897. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713212.


Perception of the Potential for Interaction in Social Scenes.

Hessels R, Benjamins J, van Doorn A, Koenderink J, Hooge I Iperception. 2021; 12(5):20416695211040237.

PMID: 34589197 PMC: 8474344. DOI: 10.1177/20416695211040237.


References
1.
Freiwald W, Tsao D . Functional compartmentalization and viewpoint generalization within the macaque face-processing system. Science. 2010; 330(6005):845-51. PMC: 3181095. DOI: 10.1126/science.1194908. View

2.
Booth M, Rolls E . View-invariant representations of familiar objects by neurons in the inferior temporal visual cortex. Cereb Cortex. 1998; 8(6):510-23. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/8.6.510. View

3.
Morgan M, Glennerster A . Efficiency of locating centres of dot-clusters by human observers. Vision Res. 1991; 31(12):2075-83. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90165-2. View

4.
TEGHTSOONIAN M . THE JUDGMENT OF SIZE. Am J Psychol. 1965; 78:392-402. View

5.
Pelli D . The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis. 1997; 10(4):437-42. View