» Articles » PMID: 20952781

The Visual System Discounts Emotional Deviants when Extracting Average Expression

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2010 Oct 19
PMID 20952781
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There has been a recent surge in the study of ensemble coding, the idea that the visual system represents a set of similar items using summary statistics (Alvarez & Oliva, 2008; Ariely, 2001; Chong & Treisman, 2003; Parkes, Lund, Angelucci, Solomon, & Morgan, 2001). We previously demonstrated that this ability extends to faces and thus requires a high level of object processing (Haberman & Whitney, 2007, 2009). Recent debate has centered on the nature of the summary representation of size (e.g., Myczek & Simons, 2008) and whether the perceived average simply reflects the sampling of a very small subset of the items in a set. In the present study, we explored this further in the context of faces, asking observers to judge the average expressions of sets of faces containing emotional outliers. Our results suggest that the visual system implicitly and unintentionally discounts the emotional outliers, thereby computing a summary representation that encompasses the vast majority of the information present. Additional computational modeling and behavioral results reveal that an intentional cognitive sampling strategy does not accurately capture observer performance. Observers derive precise ensemble information given a 250-msec exposure, suggesting a rapid and flexible system not bound by the limits of serial attention.

Citing Articles

Ensemble percepts of colored targets among distractors are influenced by hue similarity, not categorical identity.

Virtanen L, Saarela T, Olkkonen M J Vis. 2024; 24(11):12.

PMID: 39412766 PMC: 11498646. DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.11.12.


Decoding time-resolved neural representations of orientation ensemble perception.

Yashiro R, Sawayama M, Amano K Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1387393.

PMID: 39148524 PMC: 11325722. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1387393.


The effect of masks on the emotion perception of a facial crowd.

Cho J, Im H, Yoon Y, Joo S, Chong S Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):14274.

PMID: 37653061 PMC: 10471755. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-41366-0.


Ensemble averaging: What can we learn from skewed feature distributions?.

Iakovlev A, Utochkin I J Vis. 2023; 23(1):5.

PMID: 36602815 PMC: 9832727. DOI: 10.1167/jov.23.1.5.


How top-down and bottom-up attention modulate risky choice.

Vanunu Y, Hotaling J, Le Pelley M, Newell B Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(39).

PMID: 34561303 PMC: 8488801. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2025646118.


References
1.
Alvarez G, Oliva A . Spatial ensemble statistics are efficient codes that can be represented with reduced attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(18):7345-50. PMC: 2670879. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0808981106. View

2.
Sweeny T, Grabowecky M, Paller K, Suzuki S . Within-hemifield perceptual averaging of facial expressions predicted by neural averaging. J Vis. 2009; 9(3):2.1-11. PMC: 2753880. DOI: 10.1167/9.3.2. View

3.
Chong S, Joo S, Emmanouil T, Treisman A . Statistical processing: not so implausible after all. Percept Psychophys. 2008; 70(7):1327-34. DOI: 10.3758/PP.70.7.1327. View

4.
Ariely D . Seeing sets: representation by statistical properties. Psychol Sci. 2001; 12(2):157-62. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00327. View

5.
de Fockert J, Wolfenstein C . Rapid extraction of mean identity from sets of faces. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009; 62(9):1716-22. DOI: 10.1080/17470210902811249. View